Berkeley Energia Share Discussion Threads

[philjeans] 03/6/2016 14:35

LOL!

Dear old swampy getting desperate! His villa must now be unsaleable.

[laptop15] 03/6/2016 14:25

QP......looks like you are posting under the name of Daramuda on the LSE board, am i right?? Looks like u have made a friend there too...flundra ;-) Are u looking forward to tonights conference call with Paul?

[quepassa] 03/6/2016 12:28

Another good post by flundra timed today on LSE at 11.44.

This is spot on!

This is what I have been thinking for the last several weeks.

And surely the El Pais article will not have escaped the attention of potential new partners to the project in the course of their due diligence.



QUOTE

FWIW if I was BKY...

I'd ignore the story about overpaying for the office land, and manipulating the planning system, unless and until evidence appears or legal proceedings are issued. Just gives oxygen to scaremongering, and the source of the article does not seem to be mainstream.

But I'd issue comment, where a respectable national like El Pais reports legal proceedings having commenced challenging the permitting process (hard though it is to understand exactly what's happened), particularly as I'd previously confirmed permitting was completed. It's important if there is a prospect permitting will be withdrawn or development delayed.


UNQUOTE



ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[quepassa] 03/6/2016 11:37

Can't believe it. A penny has dropped.

I know I would only be mocked and shouted down again if I said it but here is a post today timed at 10.40 by a poster called flundra on London South East bulletin boards:-

QUOTE:

This looks basically like legal proceedings for judicial review of the Industry Ministry’s decision to permit the mine, on a number of points.

So the questions are what are the prospects of success for those proceedings, and how will it impact on timing (whether the proceedings are successful or not). At the moment BKY are saying the permitting is done, so they should make an RNS announcement if there are now legal proceedings on foot.

Also, people should read Retortillo’s recent posts on II. There’s a report that BKY greased the palms of local officials to get planning permission for the Retortillo office, which would be a criminal offence.

It may all be spurious and vexatious, but enough legal issues have been raised in the press now, to merit comment from BKY.


UNQUOTE.



Fully concur. Well put.


ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[quepassa] 03/6/2016 08:46

It is now some five weeks since the topic was raised in the El Pais article, dated 28th. April,namely that the Audiencia Nacional were looking into the legality of the mine.

The silence remains deafening in my view. - It doesn't take five weeks to answer a straightforward question in my opinion.

This is a link directly to the El Pais article itself:





Parties can draw their own conclusions why this remains a question where there is as yet no confirmation or denial or commentary, even after all this time.


It seems to me in my opinion only that things may or may not remain uncertain until such time as clarity is the the fore.

The market dislikes uncertainty.



ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[sharnish] 01/6/2016 21:24

Pity this thread is dominated by one, perhaps two people. I am invested and eagerly await events. Good luck all, apols I am unable to contribute.

[snowyflake] 01/6/2016 17:14

Really - at least you did not blame the bankers.

Ireland also suffered badly at the same time but hey ho the Irish have an unemployment rate of 8.8% which puts them in a good light compared with the Spanish 20.4% which in turn is the second worse in the table that I use; behind Greece with 24%.

Don't the Spanish do anything else but construction of buildings (and of course excluding uraniums mines)?

[snowyflake] 01/6/2016 09:51

If it makes you any happier we have our fair share of layabouts in Britain; but then our unemployment rate is 5.1%. Some of those are genuinely unable for medical reasons to work; some are try ons expecting others to keep them.

But 20.4% unemployed in Spain?? That's a lot for others to keep and maintain. Nothing bigoted about that. Just a realistic approach to fact. Perhaps you do not like the plain facts.

I have probably done far more than you over the years in helping the under privileged. Have a good day.

[philjeans] 01/6/2016 09:27

Swampy and his beardies have no chance of reversing that decision. Living in the past like most green sentimental loonies.

Meanwhile BKY getting on with the job and are no doubt discovering fresh resource and reserves.

Bring it on.

[snowyflake] 31/5/2016 22:04

On 31st March El Pais reported that of the City Councillors, only the mayor for Retortillo (Lorenzo Calderon) opposed the Salamanca mine. What I find interesting is that the City Council comprised 3 elected councillors who were members of the PSOE (Spanish Socialist Workers Party) including Calderon. The other two PSOE members voted with the other two councillors who were members of the PP (Peoples' Party)

So having lost i.e. after being democratically defeated, Calderon resigned.

Now we have Stop Uranium who appear to be unhappy with the democratic vote and feel that whatever happens they should get their way and they are enlisting the help of the courts. An application is just that. I do not know whether the appeal to the National Court works as it would do in the Administrative Court in England and Wales with an application on paper which would be considered by the Court which weeds out applications that have no merit before allowing those with prima facie merit to have a full hearing. There is also a matter in the local magistrate's court.

But in my view not satisfied with a democratic vote they are pursuing the matter further whilst there are 100s of jobs available which they are seeking to defeat. No wonder Spain has a 20.4% unemployment rate.

At least Hollande has realised that something needs to be done in France and I hope that as a professed Socialist, he sticks to his guns.

I do not intend to contact the company. I intend to buy some more shares.

I regard QP as a scaremonger. What I cannot work out is why. Further why waste so much of his/her time unless he/she is just an opponent of open cast uranium mines which if properly managed can employ hundreds of people and ensure that no harm will come to anyone in the vicinity.

[quepassa] 31/5/2016 10:12

wonder where herlat1 has disappeared to.

accepted the challenge but failed to produce the goodies. now he's sloped off. dented pride perhaps.

who knows, maybe even posting on other bulletin boards under a different guise!

wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if there was quite an audience on 22nd. June in Ciudad Rodrigo.

Bit messy all this.

Audiencia Nacional mentioned in El Pais. Now the local courts in Ciudad Rodrigo.

in my opinion a curious and quixotic course of action which may or may not stand a good chance of badly back-firing.



ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[philjeans] 31/5/2016 09:41

Close your short swampy-QP; you must be thousands down.

lol

[quepassa] 31/5/2016 07:18

It would not surprise me if certain court proceedings scheduled to commence on 22nd June in Ciudad Rodrigo didn't attract a good amount of media attention.

some media attention is positive. some media attention is negative.


ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[quepassa] 30/5/2016 17:45

Laptop.

Thank you for asking my question. Appreciated. -Although, it has to be said , your framing of the question was less than gracious.

Your question to me nonetheless merits a detailed answer.

I believe in the growing future demand for uranium and have in recent times invested significantly in the sector.

Hence my potential interest in the Berkeley story.

But this is where you and I and most others diverge. You will listen to the blue-skies presentations of a newly appointed CEO on the London scene for an Australian registered mining Company with its sole not-yet-in-production asset/mine in Spain. You will listen to the story and invest.

I will do the real work, go kick the tyres and trawl through the local press to see what is really happening locally where the asset is based. I will do my own homework and not just rely on the glossy brochure.

At this point in time, if there is a possibility that El Pais is right that the National Courts are looking into the legality of the mine, that is fundamental information which would colour the decision of any serious fundamental investor or partner in the project.

Let's see whether serendipity888 can get a straightforward answer to close out the discussion.

Another poster, herlat1, said he would get a response but failed.

So I am eager with anticipation for a straightforward answer from serendipity888 to a straightforward question.

Are the Audiencia Nacional/National Courts of Spain looking into the legality of the mine as reported in El Pais?

ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[laptop15] 30/5/2016 13:43

QP....i have asked serendipity to read your post to me and give us his option.You seriously read too much Spanish political news....considering your not even an investor here, why do you bother??Anyway we could have an interesting debate coming here soon!!Ps....berkeley energia...strong buy!!

[philjeans] 30/5/2016 12:47

Yes and I'm a very happy bunny, Swampy!

Pity you missed out, because of your arrogant, cycnical and negative personality!

Funding coming together now and we all look forward to further RNSs re another Zona 7 confirmation.

Chart very positive.

[quepassa] 30/5/2016 12:39

Told you!

Philijeans is a waste of space

Simple question. Falls at the first hurdle.

No answer. can't answer. Won't answer.

So, so predictable.

He's all mouth and no trousers.



ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[philjeans] 30/5/2016 11:43

QP is a professional irritant. Best to filter and forget such annoying Kreatures.

He's a Spanish swampy who owns a villa near a uranium mine.

Investors here are very happy and contented - unlike QP!

LOL

[quepassa] 30/5/2016 10:50

Laptop.

Let's put an end to this question right now.

You post on London South East.

There is a poster there called serendipity888 who puts themself across as having all the answers and appears to have become the go-to person on that bulletin board and seems perhaps to have a contact with the Company.

Please ask serendipity888 the following straightforward and unambiguous question as just posed.

It's a very important question and will hopefully put an end to this debate for once and for all. The answer will be of benefit to all, in my opinion.

If serendipity888 can provide a satisfactory answer, then we can move on and that will be beneficial for everybody.

This is the question:-

1. Is the El Pais article correct or not that the Audiencia Nacional / National Courts of Spain are looking into the legality of the mine and have requested relevant papers from The Ministry of Industry?


ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[quepassa] 30/5/2016 10:26

Pump'n'dump. Pump'n'dump. Pump'n'dump.

If you ask philijeans a simple question, he won't have a clue.

So let's give it a try:-

1. Is the El Pais article correct or not that the Audiencia Nacional / National Courts of Spain are looking into the legality of the mine and have requested relevant papers from The Ministry of Industry?


He won't answer. He doesn't know the answer. If he does respond, it won't be a straight answer.

Despite that, very happy to pump'n'dump.




ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[philjeans] 30/5/2016 09:54

Yes - it's all true. I've done very well here since I bought in and started pointing out the benefits. Still holding too.

Shame you just post negative lies and missed out on the 100% profit.

lol.