![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Versarien Plc | LSE:VRS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8YZTJ80 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.0775 | 0.075 | 0.09 | - | 623,342 | 08:00:06 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemicals & Chem Preps, Nec | 5.45M | -13.53M | -0.0091 | -0.09 | 1.15M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
29/10/2018 10:40 | Disruption and Orthodox stocks.That's my topic. How separate are they. Is it like General Theory and Subatomic theories. Only partly harmonised thanks to the bosun?Well let's try to square the circle.Microsoft was a disruptor. Intel were.But not long after they started they were being analysed conventionally.Disru | ![]() alchemy | |
29/10/2018 10:35 | Grab it whilst you can Zagrosfold. Elsewhere, guess who said "I think you'll find I have never felt more confident". | ![]() johnveals | |
29/10/2018 10:33 | The VRS chart looks like it's setting up for a good push North in the next day or two. Tight compression of pennant shape and bouncing from oversold. MACD also very wide to the downside so could whip back up at a rate of knots. Let's see. CF. | ![]() clint fleecewood | |
29/10/2018 10:30 | Please try harder to get the price down Tim, my daughter's just turned 18 and I need to fill an ISA up with VRS for her soon. Faint hope I know but if you can come up with anything believable that will be a start. Pretty comical at the mo. | ![]() zagrosfold | |
29/10/2018 10:27 | @timbo003 I'm not sure VRS are entirely sure what Nanene is. Their spec sheet keeps changing. The minimum lateral size dropped by a factor of 5 recently and they've removed the average lateral size. I guess they'll just say you can have it functionalized or not. I don't think the process is very hard to do anyway. | ![]() loglorry1 | |
29/10/2018 10:19 | Good morning @loglorry, A late start for you, I took that information from the FlexeGRAPH linkedin page, This would be what specification they need in there cooling products. What surprised me, is they already had a 2tpa graphene capacity, this should see them through any product development, why did they need FGR when there method is reported as being scalable ? Did you know that the major EV manufactures Tesla & Ford use liquid cooling of the EV batteries. IMO the increase of 60% in thermal conductivity will allow EV batteries to be charged quicker. It is reported that liquid cooling increases the battery life, I read that Ford are now giving a 10 year warranty on their batteries. some media coverage for you. ____________________ @spid good posts. That looks like another great product from FGR. Is it really 90% 2nm or less as that would mean 90% less than 6 layers! | ![]() spid81 | |
29/10/2018 10:17 | Hear hear ridicule, gawd almighty... | ![]() scottishfield | |
29/10/2018 10:16 | Can we bring this Board back to VRS please. At this rate, we will be talking about the entire stock market on here!! | ![]() ridicule | |
29/10/2018 10:08 | luminoso29 Oct '18 - 09:59 - 44208 of 44208 0 0 0 "impvesta What even more exciting than waiting for RNSs from SOCO in their drilling campaign in Vietnam ? Think you were a regular on that TMF board in the noughties ?" Hi luminoso. Yes, much more exciting than that!!! I've still got a few Soco which is my best ever investment in terms of £ profit. But for me Versarien is a different level of excitement even compared to Soco at its peak! | ![]() impvesta | |
29/10/2018 09:59 | impvesta What even more exciting than waiting for RNSs from SOCO in their drilling campaign in Vietnam ? Think you were a regular on that TMF board in the noughties ? | ![]() luminoso | |
29/10/2018 09:55 | It doesn't sound much like an apology Superg. Why don't you just try saying "I am sorry, you were right, I was wrong" | ![]() timbo003 | |
29/10/2018 09:55 | Parrots can be very expensive... Parrot shows he’s a clever boy by ordering Amazon gift boxes with voice-controlled gadget Alexa | ![]() club sandwich | |
29/10/2018 09:52 | Woody..Not talking to people on the naughty step again are you? I know it's a quiet day but if you need to speak to anyone get a parrot You have a much more interesting conversation. | ![]() pshevlin | |
29/10/2018 09:51 | Is that an apology Superg? | ![]() timbo003 | |
29/10/2018 09:43 | Well done Timbo so you now raise Nanene doesn't need Haydale type process for near all uses neither do many other such companies. Tests were done (still trying to find the paper re adding chemicals) and there was either no gain or it was detrimental partly down the such methods damaging the platelets. Hayd sell point as that all graphene needed to be functionalised they were trying to infer that they were the key to the graphene industry as if everyone would have to use companies like them. What you raise is in the original IP comments freely available to view online and mentioned on this thread. While you have been trying to work it out and battled all that tried to warn you the share price has taken an 85% dive. Glad you finally figured it out that the Hayd market is very limited and largely unneeded by producers. Now they need plenty of cash and burning £450k per month from some not so business savvy acquisitions. In short Hayd is more or less f'ked and it's folk far closer to them that think they are in trouble. | ![]() superg1 | |
29/10/2018 09:43 | @spid good posts. That looks like another great product from FGR. Is it really 90% 2nm or less as that would mean 90% less than 6 layers! Also I think there was an error in your post. You said Nanene had average lateral dimensions of 2um. I think we now know the product sheet has changed and the new version of the spec sheet does not give an average lateral dimension and the minimum is quoted at 0.1um. To others - sorry for not posting much today. I've been quite busy hope to have more time later ;-) | ![]() loglorry1 | |
29/10/2018 09:39 | Well I'm a bull and you're correct, I don't have balls, but what I do have is a lot of common sense, so I know a bargain when I spot one.... | ![]() woodpeckers | |
29/10/2018 09:37 | got to be some decent £££ | ![]() davemac3 | |
29/10/2018 09:34 | Bulls have no balls to take this over 120p, they will panic sell and run around like headless chickens, rinse and repeat lol! | ![]() ny boy | |
29/10/2018 09:04 | 'Versarien manufactured nanene.' What a great list of product supporting features! You can see why major global firms are collaborating having seen that line up! Just a matter of when, not if, to my mind. Aimo. Best ellis | ellissj | |
29/10/2018 08:56 | Thanks for that superg. Going on Neill's comments, he is obviously very keen to help utilise Nanene in anything like that which will help people with terrible diseases. Much as the money is more likely to be in composite, batteries etc, it really would be amazing if Nanene can help such things. | ![]() woodpeckers | |
29/10/2018 08:54 | For information, the latest version (version 5) of the Nanene spec sheet now reveals that Nanene is in fact Functionalised Graphene (which is what I have been saying for the since Feb 2017, following a conversation and subsequent email correspondence with Neill Ricketts back in early 2017). Furthermore, I see that it may now contain up to 3% non-carbon impurities. Will Superg now continue to insinuate that functionalisation is detrimental to graphene and will he now apologize for calling me a liar and a fraud when I suggested that Nanene was functionalized back in Feb 2017? | ![]() timbo003 | |
29/10/2018 08:53 | Yes completely agree SG. Detractors think VRS is a one trick pony, never mind about inks,MOS, Boron nitride and countless other 2D materials. Mind you that one pony is going to be huge. | ![]() rogerbridge | |
29/10/2018 08:52 | Impvesta, 6 months ago I might agree with you! | ![]() festario |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions