![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Versarien Plc | LSE:VRS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8YZTJ80 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.0137 | -12.69% | 0.0943 | 0.0906 | 0.098 | 0.1005 | 0.1005 | 0.10 | 12,077,665 | 16:35:18 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemicals & Chem Preps, Nec | 5.45M | -13.53M | -0.0091 | -0.11 | 1.61M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
25/9/2018 13:33 | Was there much elaboration regarding Gnanomat? | lovat scout | |
25/9/2018 13:33 | They shouldn't put implied timescales on anything if they don't know. It implies shoddy management. | ![]() taurusthebear | |
25/9/2018 13:29 | If there is a degree of confidentiality, then they should keep it that way across the board. Putting messages out into the public domain (i.e collaboration results due in two months, ISO imminent) play into the hands of the shorters and make an already volatile share even more so. | potsol | |
25/9/2018 13:27 | To give a timescale at this point would be market manipulation. If it were close just think how many would be buying. Just can’t be done. Wait until it is announced. | ![]() rafboy | |
25/9/2018 13:24 | Well, there will be a large degree of confidentiality involved potsol, first to market and all that. | ![]() scottishfield | |
25/9/2018 13:23 | I'm not trying to pick holes. I'm just no clearer on what timescales we are talking about here. Unlike other posters, I can't get excited about statements that carry no weight and require a huge portion of interpretation to come to a conclusion. How close, is close? Is it as 'imminent' as the ISO was back in March? | potsol | |
25/9/2018 13:20 | Once one 'goes' (ie signs up), it will be a cascade of others imo. That's the key event imo. | ![]() scottishfield | |
25/9/2018 13:17 | A “Quantmare&rdq "Steer towards quality assets in credit and equity markets for the time being..." | ![]() club sandwich | |
25/9/2018 13:15 | From AGM..."NGA aware that the US is falling behind and want Neill to go to Washington and talk to the Senate" | psxtalks2u | |
25/9/2018 13:14 | potsol, how can they all be in long-term testing, if some of them walked away after testing? I'm not there to clarify the exact phrase used, but are you not just trying to pick holes where there aren't any? the statement was (by all accounts) "No collaborations have failed. All in long term testing process. Production 'close' in a tangible way" H | ![]() herschel k | |
25/9/2018 13:13 | Are potential deals likely to be delayed until ISO is confirmed (or not)? | ![]() taurusthebear | |
25/9/2018 13:11 | I think 'not failed' is a very important indicator. I doubt if these firms will walk away because of commercial reasons. They would have considered the commercial benefits before testing. If testing is positive, the next stage would be to work out how to integrate the new technology into their manufacturing. | ![]() verger | |
25/9/2018 13:09 | Apparently Neill said 'tests' not collaborations. It's all in the wording. You've just proved my point. It's woolly. | potsol | |
25/9/2018 13:07 | If a partner had walked away that means a collaboration has failed. Does it not? | ![]() willoicc | |
25/9/2018 13:03 | Peter in China last week, many potential flew into meet him. Experts happy with our Graphene, Chinese Graphene does not compare in quality Protection of IP at the forefront, global manufacturing aim. Next big push. Neill in California November. US big opportunities, collaborations with some ‘very large’ companies NGA aware that the US falling behind, want Neill to go to Washington and talk to the Senate. | ![]() lse999 | |
25/9/2018 13:02 | I have to say, well done neill and co. Hard work and guile is getting you everywhere, and in a win/win business style that i love. V grateful holder here. Best ellis | ![]() ellissj | |
25/9/2018 13:01 | as part of the research for my new contract I came across this: Under the section 'Defining Environmental Markets' it occurred to me that VRS tech can help out in all four of those very major areas in a variety of ways... | ![]() club sandwich | |
25/9/2018 12:59 | Price improved 5p in 5 minutes since you posted--how do you do it. | ![]() lupins2 | |
25/9/2018 12:59 | Your posts get more pathetic by the hour !!!! For someone who's shorted the share at 60p your posts have the credibility of an amoeba | ![]() borg45 | |
25/9/2018 12:58 | If ever it rang true imo,'this time next year rodney' sums it up lol ! Gla. Best ellis | ![]() ellissj | |
25/9/2018 12:57 | rainbow..can only assume that you are talking to yourself again. Sad really but in advance don't come to me to borrow money for your short. | ![]() phoenixs | |
25/9/2018 12:56 | To be fair, he clearly can not give any price sensitive info at the AGM. "no collaborations have failed", only gives the barest of info. We don't know if any have have major set-backs, are ahead or on track, or suspended. Just that none have been totally terminated. But in the setting he is, that's all that can be said. | ![]() twatcher | |
25/9/2018 12:55 | Just wondering if the best will be saved until last ? Best ellis | ![]() ellissj | |
25/9/2018 12:55 | Now rainbow has spoken haha | ![]() zooskeeper |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions