Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[mutantcar] 20/7/2018 08:19

Just tried to get a quote on idealing:

Please fix these errors to continue:

The number of shares requested is greater or less than the market makers will currently allow for electronic trading as detailed below:
Minimum Quantity = 0
Maximum Quantity = 10

My order wasn't less than 0!

[dmorty87] 20/7/2018 08:18

I am suprised the market seems so lukewarm about this anoucment, we haven't even made up yesterday's loss yet.

[1retirement] 20/7/2018 08:17

Wal, thats pretty poor research to be fair. Graphene market is projected to be $278m by 2020 in your article?! Thats enough to tell me you haven't done your homework, naughty boy! Its almost as bad a piece as that done by share prophets, which was as poor as I've seen for some time. You don't happen to know each other by the way?

[jointer13] 20/7/2018 08:16

"What has happened that we don't know about that has triggered the confidence in the CFO to allow such moves."

something big coming up maybe.

don't forget our cfo is very tight with the pennies.

[craigy] 20/7/2018 08:13

The hardest thing in writing a contract is writing what you want - ie scope..... asking for a ton a year of "wonder stuff" that you then base your future business on is suicidal... the day we can write Nanene means graphene manufactured to ISO 1234567890 then contracting will be a doddle...then the dominoes will start to fallCraigy

[rogerbridge] 20/7/2018 08:13

Yes there must be something in the pipeline Chris keeps funds tightly under control.

[superg1] 20/7/2018 08:13

Sonsonny

I was thinking of them and the look on face of the China number 3 with a Paddington bear stare towards the civil servants. I wonder which one will lose their job first if Shandong doesn't get VRS on board.

[66sequoia] 20/7/2018 08:13

Great RNS , i bet wet dream twister and rainbow are enjoying reading it over there farley's rusks this morning.

[sonsonnyjim] 20/7/2018 08:10

I imagine China will be more interested than ever with further evidence of our quality and standards

[superg1] 20/7/2018 08:09

So 3 tonnes capacity and then that.

What has happened that we don't know about that has triggered the confidence in the CFO to allow such moves.

[shavian] 20/7/2018 08:08

Stunning news, which pulls together all the best bits of the conversation on this thread over recent months. Bravo VRS, and much more to come. I did wonder about Neill’s shotgun hint, crafty man!

Just a thought about DK and MK: does joining the VRS team not compromise their intellectual credibility as independent arbiters of ISO a bit? Perhaps this means that their work at ISO is now done, and that the standards have now been finalised and are ready to go, leaving them free to join who they want?

Edit: looks like we are off to the races this morning!

[fuji99] 20/7/2018 08:08

Think deep as this is the heart of the matter: 52% revenue increase with a few samples here and there. What will be the revenues with tons of graphene in the next 5 years with China and the US in the pipeline ?

[fireball xl5] 20/7/2018 08:08

Tremendous work by Neill and the team. This brings credibility to the new market space and will give that quality assurance to users, investors and adopters. Now I’m going to be ordering several dishes from a local Chinese takeaway, they are using local farm assured produce with a view to rolling this out internationally.

[squire007] 20/7/2018 08:07

Two barrels fired ............. Hit the bull, :-)

[1crackupboom] 20/7/2018 08:07

Madness this has not taken us over 1.40

[molatovkid] 20/7/2018 08:07

The last companies I can think of that came with revolutionary technology were Google, Amazon (perhaps), and of an earlier vintage, Microsoft and Apple.

All became mega cap companies and all with a lot less potential applications than graphene..

[bobsworth] 20/7/2018 08:07

Impressive RNS! Nice one VRS.

[lovat scout] 20/7/2018 08:07

Molotov - I’m well aware of high ratings ascribed to high growth companies and have no problem with current VRS share price.

I probably didn’t explain my point very well but if VRS was a mature company and made cakes, it would be expensive, however given the potential for VRS, it clearly isn’t! AIMHO etc.

[rogerbridge] 20/7/2018 08:03

Woweeee. Late start today but this confirms VRS is No1 worldwide. USA, China everywhere else the world is ending VRS !!!!!!!!!!

[1crackupboom] 20/7/2018 08:03

Can anyone buy around 1.30?

[potsol] 20/7/2018 08:02

Grabster, was just thinking that all we need now is the first major supply contract to be confirmed to justify the capacity upgrade.

[pshevlin] 20/7/2018 08:02

I'm looking forward to a big expansion phase this year.

[grabster] 20/7/2018 08:00

For such a parsimonious company to be adding expensive new names to the payroll, and investing in the scale-up to 3 tonnes, the company must know that one or more very profitable orders are about to land. I look forward to them being announced soon!

[molatovkid] 20/7/2018 08:00

VRS has the sort of technology that any company would want to own.

[walbrock82] 20/7/2018 07:59

I noticed Versarien was able to spend £5.5m in capital investment in the last four years and manage to add £167m in valuation, that’s 30.5 times. Am I the only one not understanding the value? Here’s the rest of the analysis: