Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[superg1] 01/6/2017 23:15

A quick point

There are no large scale sales of real graphene (under 10 layer) that I am aware of by any company worldwide.

Nanene launched and shortly after VRS got what they believe to have been the largest single order to date worldwide.

Instead of over £100 per gram the buyer could have got it for £2 per gram off XG. Everyone is well aware of XG as possibly the first major mover in the market, a number of big names provided backing for them. S0 why doesn't anyone want it at £2 why pay 60 times more for it. Well the answer is its been tested and it doesn't work as in various science papers.

They have been around years with big claims. AGM claim 1.5 tonnes per year which is the big con (to be revealed) but they have about 25 senior staff on the case. They don't have big sales either.

Its a new market, it takes time but the interest is there.

FUM arrived with a topical drug delivery method which would ensure rapid entry of drugs to the market with GRAS type drugs. 14 years on and they have redefined the definition of rapid to mean 10-15 years.

11 years now since they said there would be a major launch of CSD500, still not there yet.

I'm glad it's not a seaside trip with the kids in the back.

If anyone wants to be bored stiff with suitable drugs for such use by dalton weight then let me know, it's good reading for insomnia.

[timbo003] 01/6/2017 23:14

.....and here's the proof Idiot

[timbo003] 01/6/2017 23:02

>>>>superg

Just to demonstrate to others that you are a total self obsessed idiot (both you and I already know that) and that me red arrowing your posts is just a figment of your imagination, I will shortly vote down the posts that you seem to think I have already voted down as shown in the screen shot below taken a few minutes ago.

so for the record there are currently 2 down votes for your posts 4394 and 4395

leave it 5 minutes (gives you time to check) and there will be three or more down arrows next to those two posts

Don't tell me, you are now going to accuse me of having multiple blue aliases in addition to calling me a liar and a fraud. Idiot!

[luckyorange] 01/6/2017 22:35

Good on you john henry, I have warmed to you with your last few posts, you sound like an honest person.

With Talga the graphite is worth not a lot , the Chinese can make graphene from corn !

I would give a thumbs down if I could superg lol.

[superg1] 01/6/2017 22:33

Back on track

I see Cambridge ink gets a mention in this recent release. Perpetuus too which was the spin out form the Haydale management fall out.

[superg1] 01/6/2017 22:03

JH

I see they like you too with a vote down.

Hello Ireland.

[john henry] 01/6/2017 21:36

superG have never voted down any of your posts, i am not that childish. In fact ive voted up many of your posts.

[superg1] 01/6/2017 21:20

I see Talga are on a trading halt I note they are not fitting the definition of a going concern. EG They don't have enough to last 12 months. Costs £5 to £6 mill per year and cash about £3 mill at the moment.

Should be fund raise news next week. Amazing how they stumbled across a class leading cobalt find from old records released in news just before the trading halt for funding news. What a stunning coincidence.

What on earth is the world doing how have so many over-looked such fab world leading assets even when they had the records. Jeez Talga are lucky, best graphite best Cobalt best graphene., best BS. Best they not take Chris Fay onto the BOD.

[superg1] 01/6/2017 20:54

come on Timbo vote me down again its just us few guys here.

You are a silly sausage at times.

[timbo003] 01/6/2017 20:53

>>>superg

You haven't answered the question

What is the difference between Talphene and Nanene?

[timbo003] 01/6/2017 20:50

What are you on about?

I haven't voted you down, idiot!

[superg1] 01/6/2017 20:42

Thanks Timbo I have you on filter. I dropped the line in the water and sure enough up you pop with just 3 visitors in the timeframe on the flag system.

That would be you, JH and I. Blues are the only ones that can vote down. I won't be so childish on the red thumb. I knew the post would flush you out and you fell for it. lmao

keep the line tight and reel em in.

[superg1] 01/6/2017 20:39

JH

As I said no offence intended but when it looks like it then Imo it needs calling out to clear the air. You may not appreciate the amount of messages I deal with suggesting dark forces at work at times.

Hence the challenge in the open for all to see having noted your action on other shares.

The Aim is just with it's valuations. I have locked IOF and VRS for different reasons but they both have viable businesses that can grow. Unfortunately IOF hit bad luck which was exponentially magnified by a totally incompetent team changing the plan and putting plants in the wrong places.

Unfortunately the market doesn't like revenue as can be seen in the case of QFI Nano and VLS which were hype hopes at the time and were reliant on something turning into cash. Lot's of promise on their highs but the near term big money didn't appear,

Hence AGM can fly high as it has no real revenue just yet and doesn't have a viable tech

I'll quite happily say 'doesn't have a viable tech' in any legal challenge until proven otherwise because if you read it in full they have admitted it, I only spotted the reason a few days back. If they can't sort it or change to something else long term AGM are screwed imo. As they have backing and indirect backing from the same fund (combined over 30%) it doesn't leave a lot of loose shares about. It could take years before the wheels come off as AIMs are great at spinning BS.

As many say they would prefer VRS to be just Nanene and ink in which case it would have an M/C far higher with very little revenue.

[john henry] 01/6/2017 20:29

SuperG holding and havent sold a single share.

[john henry] 01/6/2017 20:25

superG i am not a trader in VRS.i was merely stating that VRS appear to have an awful lot of potential ( jam) however that potential needs to start being covered via a few JV/ contracts ( scone)

BTW your research and comments on VRS are most appreciated. Thank you

[superg1] 01/6/2017 20:09

See what I mean

Two hits from Japan today which is where the CEO is. I told you they are obliged to monitor this thread and they do.

[superg1] 01/6/2017 19:08

My view as in previous posts.

With big names and especially a new materials it takes time to go through phase 1 to get to an NDA. Then the NDA takes time to develop at which point it can turn into a JV, MOU, Heads of terms etc. After that it could turn into something big or nothing all with all options in between.

For raw sales I'm looking for a few kgs this year if they can find buyers which is separate matter from potentially one of many deals that turn into news.

Obviously we talk about graphene but there are other sectors that could see big interest.

My view is in terms of years than demanding news to satisfy a short term trade this week and next week.

If it's a big share price you are looking for then no need for any sales at all just big names. Ask Nano, QFI and many others.

QFI sales to date in the last 5 years 0,0,0, £7k, 0.

market cap achieved in that zero revenue phase in the region of £400 million.

Nano hit near £4 mill revenue at one point but its dropped to £470k. Still sits on a market cap of £100 million. Market cap hit at one point over £400 million.

VLS went to over £250 mill market cap. £-100k in that year revenue but stills sits on over £60 mill now with £1.5 mill revenue.

Loss in the 5 years for them £87 million. Loss for Nano £40 mill. QFI loss £25 mill.

So 3 companies that combined hit £1 billion market value and between then managed to lose £150 million against a combined 5 year revenue of £25 mill.

Now we have some trying to tell (that were pumping some of those) that VRS with over £7 mill revenue and an M/C of £24 million is far too high on the market cap.

[superg1] 01/6/2017 17:42

and just to quote you on OPTI

Don't fret Mazzstar, I received a very sound email from AR. I was concerned, that's why I emailed,More than happy with his reply.
Why don't you actually communicate with the company, then you wouldn't quote so much BS..



ahem!!!! Why don't you email VRS.......ditto etc etc.

[luckyorange] 01/6/2017 16:40

If they are sells then MM's are sucking them up, something in the offing?