ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

TOM Tomco Energy Plc

0.0275
0.00 (0.00%)
24 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Tomco Energy Plc LSE:TOM London Ordinary Share IM00BZBXMN96 ORD NPV
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.0275 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Drilling Oil And Gas Wells 0 -2.35M -0.0006 -0.50 1.07M
Tomco Energy Plc is listed in the Drilling Oil And Gas Wells sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker TOM. The last closing price for Tomco Energy was 0.03p. Over the last year, Tomco Energy shares have traded in a share price range of 0.0275p to 0.13p.

Tomco Energy currently has 3,904,135,277 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Tomco Energy is £1.07 million. Tomco Energy has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -0.50.

Tomco Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 41151 to 41174 of 56575 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1651  1650  1649  1648  1647  1646  1645  1644  1643  1642  1641  1640  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
09/9/2021
13:27
Yes I met Zac a few years ago, his knowledge with regards to the finance should be extremely beneficial to Tomco/ Greenfield
chadwick123
09/9/2021
13:26
Excellent stuff Damac.
hotfinance14
09/9/2021
13:20
He may be a shareholder and as such allowed to attend
vauch
09/9/2021
13:17
damac,

I can't quite understand why Jason was present at the meeting as there were no test results to announce !

Did he have anything to say either formally during, or informally after the meeting.

It's intriguing really !

What was your impression ?

Cheers

pyritie
09/9/2021
13:16
Chadwick, I had a 10 minute chat with Zac after the AGM. Very enthusiastic about the current project. We also had a chat about the previous RF tech too, (some might remember his "water, water everywhere" article for share price angel) much of which went over my head! He finished by saying that he still thinks RF could succeed in the right environment. Like you say a very knowledgeable and likeable chap.
fishyneck
09/9/2021
13:15
Damac, thanks for adding your report

"4. When do you anticipate reaching financial closure on the required plant funding?

Response: Hopefully, by current calendar year end."

No one seems to be surprised by this.
All of the talk on here has been , get the funding in place , then commit to the land deposit etc.
Almost everyone has agreed that you would not pay the 10% without the financing.

However with "Hopefully, by current calendar year end." either the land is being paid before hand or the time limit runs out , hence the question what happens then?

I suspect that will now be a route to pay out $100k a month until "current calendar year end" or they write off the $300k , or they spend whatever they have on the "hope (fully)" that they get funding.

One question that was not specifically answered above , why the initial deposit and deadline?
Who else would be interested imminently in the land?
Petroteq arguably have as much a funding problem as Greenfield / TOM so I have not had an answer yet as to why.

fenners66
09/9/2021
13:06
Yes, Zac Phillips is very knowledgeable when it comes to (amongst other things) advising start up companies/projects such as Greenfield as to what potential oil & gas sector funders need from these companies to satisfy their lending arrangements. That is why he has been acting as an advisor/consultant to Greenfield.
damac
09/9/2021
12:59
It was really interesting to hear Zac Phillips was there, such a knowledgeable guy, hope you managed to chat with him.
chadwick123
09/9/2021
12:57
Damac, thank you. If we get a good rise in share price should encourage warrant holders out of the woods.
goulding1215
09/9/2021
12:55
damac,

Thank you for your time and effort, much appreciated.

pyritie
09/9/2021
12:53
pyrite,

Yes, Jason from QFI was in attendance and was in agreement with the statement that a report on the oil samples analysis will be with Greenfield by end of September.

damac
09/9/2021
12:49
Stuart,

Well spotted, I have edited the post to read end of September. I had a brain fart, for some reason I thought we were currently in October.

damac
09/9/2021
12:44
goulding,

There was a bit of a discussion around the current MCAP. The general consensus was that once financial closure of the full funding is secured then the resources in the ground becomes bookable assets which should then see a re-rate in the MCAP. The only thing to be ironed out at that point is if they are P1 or P2 assets.

damac
09/9/2021
12:42
damac,

Could you please advise if Jason Miles (QFI) was in attendance at the AGM.

Thanks

pyritie
09/9/2021
12:41
Wont it be duck shooting season soon in the states
vauch
09/9/2021
12:41
I'm sure that should read end September Damac, 1st October. Unless another delay is envisaged.
stuart little
09/9/2021
12:39
Thank you Damac, looks like all the ducks are lining up in a row.

As they start to get the funding, and the on oil present on the lease, from the DD, will this, hopefully, increase the MCAP? Thanks

Of course, the most reassuring thing to come out of the AGM, no placing for plant finance, should keep the other board quiet.

goulding1215
09/9/2021
12:37
Well today is the day after! How things can / may change. The woolly answers are exactly what one might expect from a bunch of amateurs.
How many experts are involved in devising the strategy? For a couple of non exec chartered accountants, it really does lack substance.

lopodop
09/9/2021
12:31
rmart,

Yes, to clarify if anyone is unsure, that questions relates to the full funding package.

In relation to the 2nd part of your question, another off the cuff remark that was not is response to any question was that they are still on track for 10% Tar Sands II purchase by end of September 2021.

damac
09/9/2021
12:27
Stuart,

Yes at present, the have funds available to them to use for this purpose and that is why they can categorically state that, at present, and obviously barring any unforeseen events, they do not need a placing to raise funds for the 10% purchase.

Eggs well and truly dispatched.

damac
09/9/2021
12:27
Thanks Damac.

re Q4.

4. When do you anticipate reaching financial closure on the required plant funding?

Response: Hopefully, by current calendar year end.

I assume this means the full finance not the 10% requirement? and if so does this mean they are still on track for closure on the 10% by end of this month?

Thanks.

rmart
09/9/2021
12:21
Good work Damac....appreciated. I'm taking 'funds available' as another option being used for the 10% (as mentioned on here last week) rather than a placing....if that's confirmed the share price should react positively. Oh and copious amounts of egg will be dispatched to faces.
stuart little
09/9/2021
12:17
Devon, there is a small amount outstanding to Greenfield from Petorteq in relation to sales from POSP. I'm pretty sure the figure quoted was only £18k, it was just an off the cuff remark, it wasn't part of any response to any particular question.
damac
09/9/2021
12:15
Many thanks damac, much appreciated
chadwick123
Chat Pages: Latest  1651  1650  1649  1648  1647  1646  1645  1644  1643  1642  1641  1640  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock