We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Synairgen Plc | LSE:SNG | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0381Z20 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 4.675 | 4.36 | 4.99 | - | 38,838 | 08:00:27 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 0 | -17.65M | -0.0876 | -0.53 | 9.41M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
02/4/2020 14:59 | Hazl, I’m sorry you’re disappointed in me for disliking Twitter, but have not been a fan for a long time & am not going back. On a lighter note, it’s good news if the professionals are giving some positive feedback | makendon | |
02/4/2020 14:58 | Nobby - Thanks for booting Lith. The minute anyone starts sending out links to twitter profiles, I know they are desperate and talking rubbish - Even with my limited knowledge! | finster007 | |
02/4/2020 14:57 | I think it would be crazy to be rid of him and he has posted great links. | hazl | |
02/4/2020 14:56 | This Tiny U.K. Drugmaker Has Soared More Than 800% in Stock Rout https://www.bloomber | bloomberg2 | |
02/4/2020 14:55 | Ah I see this crosses with remarks above by chance. I think that there are loads of investors waiting in the wings for these that possibly have missed them first time around so this share price will reach a certain level when people cant resist. The fact that this is going on,in the form it is, means that it is very newsworthy, even if there are no RNS's expected. | hazl | |
02/4/2020 14:53 | I can assure you everything that lith posted in the last half an hour or so, is complete and utter rubbish. I think anyone who has been reading this thread for a couple of days will know that. He is history... | nobbygnome | |
02/4/2020 14:53 | You assume that patients will all deteriorate...some will improve with standard therapy (too many variables) Thats why there is a placebo arm in the trial... some will improve due to 'placebo' effect (psychologic) which improves symptoms even tho you may be drowning! To early to get a feel for who is on the drug | torreskid | |
02/4/2020 14:53 | The sherbet and hulk analogy made me chuckle!! Squeezed in a top up under 55, didn’t think I would get that a few days ago but today most of my portfolio is getting a kicking! Interested/excited/n | finster007 | |
02/4/2020 14:51 | 2065 thank you lithological excellent. | hazl | |
02/4/2020 14:50 | Put another way, If all COVID patients in the trial die do you think we will have to wait 8 weeks to unblind the results to see if the drug is successful or not ? | lithological heterogeneities | |
02/4/2020 14:50 | the point remains nothing can leak because no-one will KNOW who is receiving placebo or drug..... and it could be any 50 of the 100 volunteers who get the drug no matter where they're located , thats one of the reasons why it will take so long to determine the outcome | d1nga | |
02/4/2020 14:49 | LH randomisation does not happen 50/50 could be 3 to 1 or all 4 are one or other (all done through RNG) | torreskid | |
02/4/2020 14:47 | would you prefer the sherbet or the incredible hulk sweets given the choice? | acga | |
02/4/2020 14:44 | tburns, good post at 2069. i could not agree more. yes, its common sense and basic maths ! If 10 people are in a 50/50 double blind trial and 75%-100% get a positive result then its pretty bloody obvious what the unblinded results will say so no need to wait. | lithological heterogeneities | |
02/4/2020 14:43 | Sherbet fizzier for me please x | tialouise | |
02/4/2020 14:43 | I would have thought there are other telling bio markers which will indicate if the patient has been getting the drug. For example if the Interferon B level has rocketed in a patient which a placebo would not create. | guru | |
02/4/2020 14:42 | Good analogy Flash! | tburns | |
02/4/2020 14:41 | Well i never expected SNG001 to be compared to sherbet fizzers and the incredible hulk. Nice analogy flash :0) | lithological heterogeneities | |
02/4/2020 14:38 | Its normally 50/50. It is absolutely absurd, to say the least, that all 100% could be a placebo as it would make the trial utterly pointless ! The whole point of a double blind trial is to administer both the real drug and a placebo in a 50/50 format then unblind them at the end. If 75%-100% results are hgood then you already know the results are positive. | lithological heterogeneities | |
02/4/2020 14:38 | That was exactly my argument Lith a couple of days ago and I got shot down. It is common sense that it does NOT matter if the patients who get SNG-001 are blinded, the visible improvement, empirically proven will be noticiable in all vitals, blood samples, pulse, temp, breathing etc taken by the Dr's and nurses. I really struggle to see why peeps don't recognise the experienced medical professions ability to visibly notice the signs of improvement backed up by empirical data!! | tburns |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions