Synairgen Share Discussion Threads

[blueblood] 02/4/2020 10:58

Maybe Griffiths clearing out

[wetdream] 02/4/2020 10:56

Buys offset by big seller in the background as in previous days, imho.
End of year tax planning probably.

[blueblood] 02/4/2020 10:33

Fishing trip by mm's and marking it back up no as little selling volume and getting hit with buys

[talk2dubya] 02/4/2020 10:26

I can understand the attraction in trading this and they need to sort out that conditional placing before shareholders do that for them. However when trading you need to consider that news from the following could hit at any time:

Synairgen’s other current activities with COVID-19
Since the outbreak of COVID-19, Synairgen has been approached by, and is in discussion with, a number of other medical, scientific, and Governmental bodies (both in the UK, US and internationally) seeking to investigate novel therapeutics in this area.

[nick9013] 02/4/2020 10:23

All profits back in @ 55 this will now be a longer play. Hopefully a multi multi bagger

[nobbygnome] 02/4/2020 10:07

You guys need to look longer term to the results in 2 months. The price is going to be volatile in between but it is sure to be higher at that time IMHO. What price a company with a global treatment for Covid 19 and other respiratory illnesses such as flu. The potential is absolutely massive with a positive result so the price will be higher.

[festario] 02/4/2020 10:06

I'd buy more at this level, but I have no free funds. Tied up in IOF and GAN

[hazl] 02/4/2020 10:01

There will always be traders or those in fear of losing their profit.
I'm just thinking how good a successful outcome would be during the next few weeks.

[festario] 02/4/2020 10:01

Brutal mark down, 14% wiped off in half an hour.

[nobbygnome] 02/4/2020 09:58

The vote will go through no problem as the directors and large holders will all vote in favour. Zero chance of it failing IMHO.

[2nell] 02/4/2020 09:51

Watch out for those stops.

[kop202] 02/4/2020 09:51

Classic tree shakePrecipitous fall on no news

[lithological heterogeneities] 02/4/2020 09:32

PROFESSOR TOM WILKINSON: HEAD OF SNGOO1 TRIAL


Nothing new on there yet but obviously worth watching for any updates

[toffeeman] 02/4/2020 09:27

There is zero point in any of us voting against - use the time more productively and make a cup of tea :)

[lithological heterogeneities] 02/4/2020 09:25

STOP PRESS :

SNG001 TRIAL NURSE:
Sandy Aitken(Respiratory Research Nurse)


01 APR 20
"Now randomised 4 patients. Working really hard sometimes 12 hours a day, but feeling good that I am contributing to the fight against Covid 19"

[jev1] 02/4/2020 09:22

Ambiorix

Lansdowne have been in for a while.

[74tom] 02/4/2020 09:22

@Nobby, my only short term concern is the conditional placing on 14th April. I understand that 75% of votes are needed in order to accept the second placing tranche of £10m @35p. Talk2Dubya has already stated he intends to vote against the placing, my question would be how many other PI's feel the same?

It's undoubtedly annoying for the conditional placing price to sit 40% below the current bid, but the big picture view would suggest SNG need the £10m in order to progress. I deem it unlikely that we'll receive material news on the trial prior to 14th April, so if the conditional placing is rejected, wouldn't this be potentially damaging for SNG?

If only the gap between firm & conditional placing had been smaller, this wouldn't have been an issue...

[2nell] 02/4/2020 09:21

TB,they were doing that yesterday as well.

[ic0gcds00] 02/4/2020 09:18

Rather harsh by mms

[tburns] 02/4/2020 09:14

Someone, probably same person as yesterday is dumping regular 10k blocks

[ambiorix1] 02/4/2020 09:04

According Synairgen website Landsdown Partners holds 17% of Synairgen. Is this new ?

[hazl] 02/4/2020 08:59

We each of us know that a share can be completely trashed,by nonsense especially those where there seem to be paid de rampers,in my opinion.

OT
M I will get back to you take care.

[vitec] 02/4/2020 08:53

Nobby, I respect you and what you post is informative. I was not being specific regarding one poster I was making a general point. My reasoning comes from not listening in the past to lone voices who in the end were proven right, even though their motives could have been questionable. I will not say anything more on the matter as at the end of the day I want what you want and that is for SNG to succeed.

[fatnacker] 02/4/2020 08:53

There's a world of difference between a genuine reasonable argument and one from a Jeremy Kyle devotee.

[nobbygnome] 02/4/2020 08:50

Well said vitec. Normally I would agree with you but he was a troll of mine from the IMM days. Some people absolutely hated that I called the Lupuzor trial exactly correctly. A lot of money was lost by some although I had numerous messages (about 15) from people saying I had saved them a fortune.