ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

SCLP Scancell Holdings Plc

11.125
0.00 (0.00%)
26 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Scancell Holdings Plc LSE:SCLP London Ordinary Share GB00B63D3314 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 11.125 10.75 11.50 11.125 11.125 11.13 194,022 08:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Pharmaceutical Preparations 5.27M -11.94M -0.0129 -8.62 103.17M
Scancell Holdings Plc is listed in the Pharmaceutical Preparations sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SCLP. The last closing price for Scancell was 11.13p. Over the last year, Scancell shares have traded in a share price range of 7.65p to 18.125p.

Scancell currently has 927,819,977 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Scancell is £103.17 million. Scancell has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -8.62.

Scancell Share Discussion Threads

Showing 21076 to 21097 of 67525 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  853  852  851  850  849  848  847  846  845  844  843  842  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
25/3/2019
14:59
Gazza,

Not sure I'm with you - all DCF valuations are based on projected sales and the fact that Trinity have factored royalties into their valuation suggests they're assuming the products will be licensed. We don't know what assumptions they're making for the timing of any licensing deal - in terms of revenue it's not that important, it's the percentage figure that counts no matter when the deal is struck. It could make a tremendous difference to costs of course.

bermudashorts
25/3/2019
14:09
Thanks for the responses guys.

Bermuda,

There would be no sales if it was in clinical trials. The Trinity figures are based on sales of approved product with a launch date of 2024 (Melanoma) and 2025 (NSCLC). The royalty on NSCLC is 15% allowing for the CRUK cut.

gazza
25/3/2019
14:02
inanaco,

what do you mean?

bermudashorts
25/3/2019
13:43
Bermuda ..

have you just posted .. "variable" ? for those looking to translate that LOL

inanaco
25/3/2019
13:22
goooosed

Thanks for that

bermudashorts
25/3/2019
13:21
Gazza,

That would be a fairly typical rate for a phase IIb or III product. For preclinical you'd be looking at low single digit percentages and for phase I/II - single digit to low double digit. Royalty rates often remain confidential so worth remembering that it's hard to get accurate figures for averages and of course they vary tremendously. Often also tiered with different percentages for different levels of sales.

All IMO of course

bermudashorts
25/3/2019
12:50
depends if the deal is front or end loaded ..

basically the "overall value" is the start point so it depends on mainly Efficacy in that the Risk element is high or low .. if its low then a end loaded deal is far more preferential as you retain the possibility of efficacy value being included.

this is why i think Moditope is so difficult because "Complete Response" efficacy could add billions to its value .. again if you look at the NICE formulae these elements really do make a difference to the amount you can charge

inanaco
25/3/2019
12:20
Thanks goosed.

just going back to valuations:

I notice in the Trinity Delta report valuation, they use a royalty figure of 17%. Is this an industry average does anyone know?

gazza
25/3/2019
09:43
Scancell attracting early (research/academic) interest in its Glyco platform :
gooosed
23/3/2019
09:57
P S -
Inane'n'co spouts - "except Lozan never has a view"
It is NOT ""except Lozan never has a view""
One might believe - It is my fault this sits at sub 6p ???
It IS the 'VIEW' = 6p...Of the market = REAL Experts, experienced people in the REAL financial world... not "Lozan's View".
Do *WE ALL* think they are WRONG ???
OR
Do *WE ALL* 'place our TRUST in, and believe *the words* of'...a self CONfessed spiv, Who - Whilst urging others to 'BUY'BUY'BUY and HOLD {on to resulting LOSSES} - to - "GO ALL IN", "NO RISK here" etc.
WAS
Secretly SELLING { do not forget HIS SCAM mates, who were probably doing the same}
=
It could be said - Lozan is not alone in *Lozan's VIEW* as to WHO is 'TRUSTWORTHY or NOT'

the real lozan
23/3/2019
00:53
Gazza

bermuda and myself are talking about modi1

TNBC ... using modi1 instead of radical surgery / adjuvant chemo

inanaco
22/3/2019
23:05
Bermuda, thanks again.Inan, The value of the melanoma treatment market is reportedly $14b dollars. Are you saying this cost is only drugs and that other costs, for example, surgery could be added to a drug such as SCIB1 as it could replace surgery?
gazza
22/3/2019
20:19
the complete response rate is absolutely critical in the modi1 trials because the bulk tumour before surgery and adjuvant chemo maybe indicative of the highest point in the autophagy cycle

which is why i just do not see how you can firm any valuation because you are missing so much data ...

however if a CR appears in Phase 1 .... get excited

inanaco
22/3/2019
20:13
I keep explaining that you still as yet do not know staging .. reason why i say that Bermuda is it maybe possible to save the patient before a mastectomy rather than after ...


hxxps://www.clinicaloncologyonline.net/article/S0936-6555(18)30442-4/fulltext

inanaco
22/3/2019
20:00
Ruck,

Around 7,500 new cases of TNBC are diagnosed in the UK each year out of a total of approx. 170,000 worldwide.

bermudashorts
22/3/2019
19:18
that is up to Ruck .. it is his project
inanaco
22/3/2019
18:57
because every stage has a "standard of care"

for instance

melanoma first ""standard of care""" is surgery

second stage is adjuvant to surgery

etc etc



NICE ... well it's indicative of value Bermuda .. not sure what algorithm you would use for a """ global drug marketing valuation """

inanaco
22/3/2019
18:33
which means

valuations per patient would have to be considered using NICE formula

which brings us back to square one again

inanaco
22/3/2019
18:32
fine ...

but that then creates a problem as Ruck was trying to use the expenditure to that point as a gauge to market size, when you cannot because it's already been spent

thus Moditope technically could be a Brand new market if we know the exact point of vaccine delivery to staging

inanaco
22/3/2019
18:29
......but we have been told by Lindy Durrant that the setting for Moditope is late stage, bulky tumours - so would you agree that at least Modi1 will target stage IV breast cancer patients? It may be that it's also suitable for some earlier stages but for now stage IV would be a reasonable assumption?
bermudashorts
22/3/2019
18:12
I refer back to my original post that we discussed


inanaco - 21 Mar 2019 - 18:26:02 - 21036 of 21136 Using immunology to fight cancer. - SCLP
that is what i replied to Bermuda

ruckrovers post


""""Did anyone manage to find out how much the market for triple negative breast cancer is?
I believe it will be one of the first MODI in human trials.""""

answered perfectly with

"""the issue is staging ... to try to assess market size, moditope is a late stage treatment as such we do not yet know the optimal staging thus its difficult to predict patient numbers, because many that fall through early diagnosis will not do well because of the aggressive nature of the decease. """

inanaco
22/3/2019
18:05
Inanaco,

So do you see Modi1 as a first line treatment for late stage TNBC?

bermudashorts
Chat Pages: Latest  853  852  851  850  849  848  847  846  845  844  843  842  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock