ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

SCLP Scancell Holdings Plc

11.50
0.00 (0.00%)
12 Dec 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Scancell Holdings Plc LSE:SCLP London Ordinary Share GB00B63D3314 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 11.50 11.00 12.50 - 0.00 07:43:22
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Pharmaceutical Preparations 0 -5.86M -0.0063 -18.25 106.7M
Scancell Holdings Plc is listed in the Pharmaceutical Preparations sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SCLP. The last closing price for Scancell was 11.50p. Over the last year, Scancell shares have traded in a share price range of 8.86p to 19.50p.

Scancell currently has 927,819,977 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Scancell is £106.70 million. Scancell has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -18.25.

Scancell Share Discussion Threads

Showing 72976 to 72999 of 73475 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  2927  2926  2925  2924  2923  2922  2921  2920  2919  2918  2917  2916  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
27/11/2024
07:35
Actually, the biggest "bitcoin believers" are criminals.....
markingtime
27/11/2024
07:24
You're an idiot Ruck. Finite supply = a lot more poverty or practically infinite subdivisions together with higher perceived value which brings us to the exact same result.

That is, in the case of gold, after all the wars for the reserves settle. It is always the essence that matters not the medium.

sci102
27/11/2024
07:18
Ivy, Yes, in theory they can issue as many shares as they like at whatever price they like. The flip side is that there are assets underpinning the share price. Like gold, effective cancer treatments are rare and in limited supply.
ruckrover
27/11/2024
07:15
Yes Sci, gold reserves, something with a finite supply. Some Polynesian societies used rare sea shells. The Romans used salt (Latin salarium from which we get the word salary) Don't be confused by the fact Gordon Brown sold out the UK reserves on the cheap. The USA, Germany still have reserves and Russia and China have significantly increased their reserves over the past 50 years. I admit that things have changed since I studied Economics, there was no digital currency back then!
ruckrover
27/11/2024
07:12
Morning Ruck.
“ Just like bank notes” or shares they can simply print more and although some on here think SCLP shares are rare and in limited supply backed by the “Gold Standard” Science others may have a different view.
So all about how many believe in any asset that makes it valuable and rise or fall in price.
Quite a simple concept really

ivyspivey
27/11/2024
06:07
That's the point. How is btc any different in this regard?

Back to gold reserves???🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 9315;

sci102
27/11/2024
06:05
"there is in practice an endless supply,"Just like bank notes. There is nothing stopping governments printing money. This is why they need to be backed up by gold reserves - something rare and in limited supply.
ruckrover
27/11/2024
04:49
Tyke

Bitcoin splits
2012 mining a block was reduced from 50 to 25 BTC. 2016 to 12.5 BTC. 2020 decreased to 6.25 BTC. 2024 3.125 BTC.

In addition, BTC is divisible into 100 million satoshis. Layers on top of Bitcoin can further subdivide satoshis, giving Bitcoin potentially infinite divisibility.

You are the one celebrating a ponzi scheme that, because in practice it is infinitely subdivisible, there is in practice an endless supply, and you don't even understand the basics of what you so admire.

Also, eliott waves is pseudotechnical nonsense addressed to cult-prone morons.

You managed to prove yourself a bigger clown than CT and inan. Einstein was right I guess, stupidity is infinite.

By the way, technical analysis in general all it does is provide a framework for traders to work in, it does not quantify any fundamental properties but rather provides a cue for people that nucleates (more than predicts) largely emotional responses.

sci102
27/11/2024
04:18
Ruck. Agree with all that - eat less meat, use the car less, avoid conspicuous consumption and I also plan to have less children (wink). Last on this. Cheers Inan.
torquayfan
27/11/2024
01:38
"all we are doing is offshoring our carbon footprint"Too true!
ruckrover
27/11/2024
01:31
Tf you suggested that tax's should rise to pay for services suggesting pensioners should foot the bill, the point about net zero ... its like a tax but this time its your energy bills, but the real money is yet to be spent ..

question is are we competitive on pricing .....

uk industry pays double what the US pays

all we are doing is offshoring our carbon footprint

sort out the energy market first ! before we endeavour on bankrupting the UK

inanaco
27/11/2024
00:48
TF, I think two of the major problems in trying to achieve Co2 reductions are 1) people only make token gestures and 2) too much focus is on headline grabbing areas - for example air travel.If people want to make a difference, the two things they should do are: adopt a plant based diet and give up the car for public transport. (Neither of which I personally have done I regret to say) Also, collectively, we need to have fewer children. A lower population would produce less CO2.For yourself, I'd suggest getting a train to Thailand - much lower CO2 than air travel!
ruckrover
27/11/2024
00:07
Inan - Not sure why I feature in 14844 but never mind. On 'net zero', my thought is that we all need to endeavour to travel less, wherever possible, but that has some changes involved, not least for myself !
torquayfan
26/11/2024
21:15
Well, when you've been so comprehensively taken to the cleaners....I'm not surprised inane...lol
2tyke
26/11/2024
21:07
maybe they are ... but that is not YOU ...

that is my last post to you ATB

inanaco
26/11/2024
20:51
Think you'll find Bitcoin believers and traders are generally wealthy inane.
It's SCLP traders who are usually traumatized...lol
,.........................................

Public finances are always going to be a problem....until we start using real money...like Bitcoin.

2tyke
26/11/2024
20:39
lets not forget my Betfred ............. on Reeves

Businesses may face further tax rises this parliament, a senior Cabinet minister has said, in an apparent contradiction of claims by Rachel Reeves that taxes would not go up again.

Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, declined to echo comments by the Chancellor on Monday that she was “not going to come back for more” after her record £40bn tax-raising Budget last month.

Instead, he told MPs on the business and trade committee: “What the Chancellor was saying ... is to make clear that that need to fix the foundations is a one-time deal, that there will not be a further ask of the business community comparable to what we had to do at the beginning of this parliament.”

The response is likely to raise fresh fears among businesses that they will be hit by further tax raids to shore up the public finances.

Telegraph

inanaco
26/11/2024
20:28
2tyke ... does not matter what Bitcoin is doing .. its your lack of wealth that is a concern ...

you are traumatised, a victim to history ... you didn't buy bitcoin

now for some unknown reason you have set your self up as a unpaid financial advisor

who nobody listens to ... bit like Lord Spike ..

you should be so proud, just like Mrs Lozan feels about Lozan prowess of choosing the best logs the ultimate alternative view of any situation without mentioning what that view is ...

the good news apparently Labour is investing in mental health even thou the majority are just winging it ... for a guaranteed sick note and why not the benefit culture under labour never gets curtailed. so you can post on here without fear of actually having to work.

Don't worry those with the broadest shoulders will pay ....

inanaco
26/11/2024
19:43
Oh you think a healthy 7% correction constitutes a crashing ponzi-scheme do you inane ?
Why not compare your investment prowess against mine over the past 12 years we've held these choices...........................................................................
Bitcoin up 7500 % ( only ever 21 million)
SCLP down 78%.... including massive dilution.
Hmmm ...makes you look a bit of an investment idiot doesn't it ?
Well..we knew you were that anyway !
..........................................
And actually if you care to look on NASDAQ. There are a few companies in the same therapeutic area as scancell and at the same trial stage.
Difference is the NASDAQ companies are a fraction of the SCLP share price

2tyke
26/11/2024
19:13
and we know why 2030 is such an important date to get things done "forced through" with little planning required

The next United Kingdom general election is scheduled to be held no later than Tuesday 15 August 2029.


""So we should thank Bill Esterson, Labour chair of the Commons Energy Security and Net Zero Committee, for letting the cat out of the bag. “We will all have to change our lives” """

inanaco
26/11/2024
19:09
Les jeux sont faits, Ed Miliband. The chips are down, the game is up. We knew Labour was no closer to solving the energy trilemma than scientists are to explaining dark matter. That, for now, we cannot have net-zero emissions, security of supply and affordability. We knew that using public money to import gas to manufacture CO2 was less a display of moral leadership on climate change than it was brazen hypocrisy.

Perhaps most importantly, we knew that the pursuit of net-zero policies, regardless of cost, would impact our lives in ways the gentleman in Whitehall could not possibly foresee. It already is, as anyone who has driven into a clean air zone can attest. Yet the ruling class insisted on living in some alternate reality where there were no trade-offs; just cheap, abundant, secure renewables.





So we should thank Bill Esterson, Labour chair of the Commons Energy Security and Net Zero Committee, for letting the cat out of the bag. “We will all have to change our lives” if we are to decarbonise the grid by 2030, he has just admitted. Keir Starmer is offering no such candour; at Cop29, the climate jamboree many world leaders had the good sense to snub, the Prime Minister not only set us another target (an 81 per cent reduction in emissions by 2035), but peddled the line that he “won’t be telling people how to behave”.

This will surely only be true in the most literal sense. Impose congestion charges in British cities, and people might be forced to travel by other means, or not at all. Foist mandates on car manufacturers to sell a certain number of EVs on penalty of hefty fines, and they may be forced to cut sales of petrol vehicles, pushing prices up and consumers out. Introduce green levies on energy bills – they now make up 16 per cent of electricity bills – and households will have to cut spending elsewhere. Did the Government “tell” us to change our behaviour? No, it just left us with no alternative.


Telegraph

you have all been led up the garden path .............. brain washed

“The clean energy transition is unstoppable,” said the fanatical Miliband yesterday, as Vauxhall announced the closure of its Luton factory. “Unstoppable because clean energy is the route to energy security. Unstoppable because it is the economic opportunity of our time.” A noble lie is still a lie.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

there is absolutely no way that £500 billion of costs min can be absorbed with out higher "something"

and you will still need backup of supply

sadly Tf ... somebody has to want to pay ..... high tax's

and they are few are far between

inanaco
26/11/2024
18:23
the Tyke Cartel Bristol Ltd

product

delta- 9-tetrahydrocannabinol


Value has dropped by the lower Bit Coin, due to volatility in the Ponzi Market down from 99k to 93k

inanaco
26/11/2024
16:35
Any examples 2tyke?
bermudashorts
26/11/2024
16:22
I say 'little stock' even though it's market cap is far higher than many biotechs that actually have products on the market.
2tyke
Chat Pages: Latest  2927  2926  2925  2924  2923  2922  2921  2920  2919  2918  2917  2916  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock