Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[torquayfan] 26/11/2024 01:45

. . . "but they paid into it".

No. 'They' paid a tax masquerading as a fund for the future. The truth is that NI monies have never been set aside for the future pension payments but have always been used to defray current year's expenses. So 'They' have benefited already, in effect, by not being taxed on something else in those past years.

There is no fund set aside for Pensions. It's a current liability to be settled from ccurrent income. My earlier refers.

Get some sleep M8.

[inanaco] 26/11/2024 01:22

but they paid into it .... more so than the low paid why do you need to cheat people ?

funding has to come from somewhere ! but not at the expense of growth

its quite a simple sum "keep within your budget" and don't over promise

we are now spending £4.5b on illegals !!!

we have given away £500m to foreign farmers

huge foreign aid budget

list goes on and on ...

anyway you are already seeing growth stall ... and the main taxs have not kicked in yet

give it a year and labour business plan will collapse

[torquayfan] 26/11/2024 01:12

inan - "All pensions are means tested Tf via Income Tax".

That's not a means test that's an income tax. Really, some Retirees just don't need the State Pension - reduce their tax burden by not paying it in the first place. Simple.

Funding has to come from somewhere . . . . . .

[inanaco] 26/11/2024 00:53

all pensions are means tested Tf via Income Tax and fiscal drag will make that far worse, so in effect the state pension is being clawed back for those with private pensions

no escape

[torquayfan] 25/11/2024 23:28

Reeves made a ridiculous mistake - increasing Employers NI and directly undermining one of Labour's stated aims, to 'get people back to work'.

So where else could the funds have come from ? How about setting aside the 'triple lock' and making the State Pension a means tested benefit, not paid to those who already have good private income for their old age. Then there's also Public Service 'gold-plated' pensions which are not sustainable and will have to be addressed one day.

That's it !

[inanaco] 25/11/2024 17:48

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has told businesses she is "not coming back with more borrowing or more taxes" as she defended the tax rises on businesses announced in the Budget.

Worth a Betfred for sure .......

2.3m

[inanaco] 25/11/2024 13:49

mmm wonder why he didn't go electric instead of his Skoda comic, thought that is what Guardian readers and lefties do ...

patiently sit in a q to pay 80p a KWh on boost

approx twice the cost of Petrol, even after pump tax per mile

still ... they love it ! something to talk about over earl grey and scones while waiting

drag coefficients are logarithmic ... hence you see electric cars at 40 mph in 70 mph limits

[inanaco] 25/11/2024 13:39

Ruck appears to be a Socialist

Beers with MT ? i suspect not

[willoicc] 25/11/2024 13:30

Now over 2.14 million.

[ruckrover] 25/11/2024 13:20

Par for the course here - getting hysterical over absolutely nothing.

[nigelpm] 25/11/2024 13:19

Quite ruck. Just over 3% of population is nothing.

[ruckrover] 25/11/2024 13:17

So what?2 million is a fraction of the nearly 10 million who voted Labour. So a few disgruntled tories can't accept the result of a democratic election.

[inanaco] 25/11/2024 12:51

its 2.1 million ... i anticipated the revulsion of this Gov would cause a natural increase

[markingtime] 25/11/2024 12:30

It isn't "2,000,000 already" inane......it is nearly 1,910,000.Should we all assume that you went to the same maths classes as Dianne Abbott and Rachel Reeves? That would explain some of your issues.....

[2tyke] 25/11/2024 12:05

Lol...there is no hope for inane..
The only people who have made any money on this stock are the traders.
With the exception of inanaco...a particularly useless trader... lol

[inanaco] 25/11/2024 11:58

you should get elected to Rucks "New Investment strategy" Board Lozan

[inanaco] 25/11/2024 11:10

I am not the one facing a credit card bill ...

ATB

[ruckrover] 25/11/2024 11:07

Inan, As your posts make no sense I asked AI to interpret. This is what it had to say:"It sounds like you're expressing some frustration or concern about a situation involving MT and Ruck, possibly related to a financial or investment matter. If you could provide a bit more context or clarify your message, I'd be happy to help you understand or address the issue. "

[inanaco] 25/11/2024 10:58

I hope MT is as astute as you Ruck ... ie nothing has changed

and with this "mistake" driving this remarkable plan of "no change" you now expect £1 a share


and you can keep "our"

you cannot speak for me ...

[inanaco] 25/11/2024 10:45

so nothing changed then !

"Perhaps Ruck will give us the wisdom of his New Investment strategy"
I just have

"is he OUT"
No, I have explained my plan:
Sell a few in the coming month to pay the Australia trip.
Sell a few at 40p to recover my original investment.
Sell a few at £1 to realise a profit
Let the remainder ride and see where they go.

other than giving it a fancy Title ...

[ruckrover] 25/11/2024 10:37

Inan,

You must have got 0 out of 10 for comprehension. You really need to read posts more carefully and perhaps you wont come up with such idiotic conclusions.

"now as you have admitted your mistake Ruck ...."
OUR mistake Inan, OUR mistake

"you are determined to undermine Scancell because you want to blame somebody"
No, I have never undermined Scancell nor blamed them for the share price Scancell have done a fantastic job. We must take the blame entirely for our own mistakes

"yet even thou you have been moaning for years you did not sell out ? in the 20p plus range"
No, I have never moaned, merely stated what position we are in. No, I haven't sold out. I sold a few at 28p (bought the same day for 14p) and some as 28p (that I bought with my pension lump sum at 17p). The profit bought a Skoda Kamiq. My "core" holding has remained intact for 12 years or more.

"your logic by admitting you got it wrong holding (you have been saying it for years) compounded by not selling"
No, I'm in exactly the same situation as you. I bought, as did you, as a quick trade that didn't come off. Now, as a result of not selling in the 60s, 50s or 40s and languishing here at 14p, I have no choice but to hold on in the hope of walking away with at least something.

"if you have now decided that trading Scancell is the only option ..."
No I haven't. The option were, are and will be: Invest;Trade;A combination of the 2

"but we are in the countdown period for that explosive news"
Yes, we have been in countdown for 14 or more years. It could be many years yet. Also, as we have seen over that time, explosive news doesn't always affect the share price as we might think.

"Perhaps Ruck will give us the wisdom of his New Investment strategy"
I just have

"is he OUT"
No, I have explained my plan:
Sell a few in the coming month to pay the Australia trip.
Sell a few at 40p to recover my original investment.
Sell a few at £1 to realise a profit
Let the remainder ride and see where they go.

Don't forget, we all have different finantial needs and aspirations so what is a good strategy for me may not work for you. You seem to think that there is only one way that is right - you way! LOL

"nobody Knows ... but his big words sound impressive"
They may seem big words to you but in reality I speak in straightforward and simple
terms.

[inanaco] 25/11/2024 10:29

2,000,000 already

[inanaco] 25/11/2024 10:17

few days trading left and we are in Dec ...

more news

Perhaps Ruck will give us the wisdom of his New Investment strategy

is he OUT

nobody Knows ... but his big words sound impressive