![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rhythmone | LSE:RTHM | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYW0RC64 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 169.50 | 168.00 | 171.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/2/2017 10:40 | Anyone else get the feeling that Tosca maybe topping up with the very very tight trading range? | ![]() football | |
01/2/2017 10:20 | P&G confirms media review in UK and Northern Europe amid transparency concerns Procter & Gamble has launched a media pitch in the UK, Ireland and four other northern European markets in the Nordics. | ![]() sikhthetech | |
01/2/2017 10:14 | chart trades - 100k buy | ![]() sikhthetech | |
01/2/2017 10:13 | 9? That's beat me. I've only 8!! | ![]() kendonagasaki | |
01/2/2017 09:59 | good question.. what do you reckon 1gw/loaf ... in the interests of transparency and for neutral posters (current, newbies(ex Perk)), as amt asks, surely, with quantcast's huge increase, a BIG uplift in revenue??? are you going to upgrade your fy revenue forecast to $200m++++... if not, why not.. amt1 Feb '17 - 07:15 - 3036 of 3038 3 0 Moderate | Ban In very rough terms Quancast metrix seems to hsve doubled since later part of last year. Surely that must result in a big uplift in revenue since last Qtr. | ![]() sikhthetech | |
01/2/2017 09:49 | what about your mate who admitted to having 9 devices.. 1gw31 Jan '17 - 19:43 - 720 of 726 1 0 multi-ids Barkboo, if you register as Mr Bark Boo on your home computer, Prof B Boo on your work (or close mate's) computer, Mr D Duck on your mobile phone (not going through your Wi-Fi router), and Mr M Mouse on your wife's mobile phone, how on earth would advfn work out that this was all the same person? | ![]() sikhthetech | |
01/2/2017 07:54 | No, I think he is just 'mental' Barky. | ![]() kendonagasaki | |
01/2/2017 07:49 | Wow - One flew over the coo-coo's nest indeed! Some people you can never help, and unfortunately it is normally the ones that need help the most! Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal..equally, nothing on earth can help the man with a wrong mental attitude! | ![]() barkboo | |
01/2/2017 07:46 | Sikh, I hear that you are upset and feeling that you are being picked on?Now why would that be?I mean you are a man with integrity and a voice and of reason.A straight player, honest, virtuous and very very fair. | ![]() kendonagasaki | |
01/2/2017 07:33 | Amt, it certainly appears to be positive news.If we are increasing profits here also then the year end figure will hopefully be impressive?The share price is waiting to react sharply with the results also.When it goes up we know that it goes up hard and fast.Brian and the team know they can't afford yet another mediocre performance. The time to deliver is now and now is the time. | ![]() kendonagasaki | |
01/2/2017 07:15 | In very rough terms Quancast metrix seems to hsve doubled since later part of last year. Surely that must result in a big uplift in revenue since last Qtr. | ![]() amt | |
31/1/2017 22:04 | One flew over the coo-coo's nest. | stocky | |
31/1/2017 20:15 | and that is why I've previously posted whether, due to record quantcast figures, posters are going to upgrade their fy forecasts... so given the record quantcast figures during the low season, are you going to upgrade your fy revenue forecast... in the interests of showing neutral posters that you're being transparent about quantcast... | ![]() sikhthetech | |
31/1/2017 20:12 | andy, absolutely... some people are naive about ipaddresses, ip tracking and multi ids... | ![]() sikhthetech | |
31/1/2017 20:09 | you now also know what a neutral reader might think... then why not clarify the post instead of posting personal attacks at me.... what's stopping you from countering it with your own opinion or posting articles.. if they read quantcast is powering ahead to record highs, what do you think a neutral reader would think? - that record money is rolling in 1R??? we both know that is not true but a neutral reader, who doesn't know what quantcast is, might get that false impression, wouldn't they.. Yet you don't see that as a problem for neutral readers... why's that?? This is a 1R BB where both bull/bear points are raised and discussed and counter arguments put forward... it's called a discussion, you have your opinion, I have mine... but you would rather post about the poster rather than countering the post.. that's not very neutral of you, is it?? | ![]() sikhthetech | |
31/1/2017 19:55 | Anyone with a dynamic IP address; anyone with BT broadband for example, can get a new IP address simply by rebooting their router. | ![]() andydangerous | |
31/1/2017 19:54 | STT - you're (deliberately, presumably) completely missing the point. This is an R1 investor bulletin board. In that context, the P&G article is relevant (imo) because of the connection between R1 and the things that P&G is looking for (fraud prevention, third party vetting, viewability standards). In my view the connection is very positive for R1. You instead chose to highlight in your commentary methbot, fraud and changing advertiser requirements - which to any neutral reader I believe would suggest you thought the article had negative implications for R1. I don't think anyone would argue with you that the methbot fraud has implications for adtech, the question is what is the relevance of the article for an R1 investor bulletin board? This is where your mastery of negative spin comes in - you choose to highlight a factual point which is completely secondary to the relevance of the article to an R1 investor (again, in my opinion). | ![]() 1gw | |
31/1/2017 19:49 | 1gw, good luck with your views... keep checking my posting history on all my shares... look forward to your conclusion... don't forget several threads were created by the gang, it's worth checking those as well... you're so naive if you sincerely believe the others are so transparent and sincere in their views... each to their own... One day you might realise why the gang are rattled when multi ids and gkp are mentioned... I won't tell you... Good luck with your searching.. | ![]() sikhthetech | |
31/1/2017 19:43 | multi-ids Barkboo, if you register as Mr Bark Boo on your home computer, Prof B Boo on your work (or close mate's) computer, Mr D Duck on your mobile phone (not going through your Wi-Fi router), and Mr M Mouse on your wife's mobile phone, how on earth would advfn work out that this was all the same person? | ![]() 1gw | |
31/1/2017 19:26 | My point was that imo most of those other posters you both mention are fairly transparent. i.e. it is fairly obvious when they are being positive, negative, trying to wind up other posters or just having a laugh. That doesn't mean they are consistent (some do change from positive to negative and back again without a lot of real news in between), but they're not saying one thing while their posting history suggests something else. I took issue with barkboo (what feels like many years ago) and stt because I felt they were being non-transparent i.e. they were saying one thing while their posting history implied something else. | ![]() 1gw | |
31/1/2017 18:56 | Have you contacted the company to ask? | lance corporal winstanley ash | |
31/1/2017 18:52 | 1R do partner with White ops, as I mentioned last month... sikhthetech - 29 Dec 2016 - 09:51:47 - 2282 of 3030 RHYTHMONE - new Name, new Beginning??? - RTHM 1R partners with Whiteops... as do Rubicon... Rubicon & Whiteops have clearly stated that Rubicon don't have any of the 300m fraudulent traffic... do 1R?? From their H1 results... | ![]() sikhthetech |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions