Rhythmone Share Discussion Threads

[sikhthetech] 31/1/2017 11:12

In fact I believe a lot more changes within the industry will take place BECAUSE of Methbot...

[1gw] 31/1/2017 11:05

STT - 3019. One of the descriptions of your posting I used was "...overwhelmingly slanted to the negative, not because the newsflow is overwhelmingly negative but because you manage to impart a negative spin to the items you post and apparently "miss" positive items"

If I look at your P&G post I see you add the following commmentary:
"Last month we had Methbot, the biggest fraud to hit online advertising.. and now P&G, the largest advertiser is laying down new rules..."

I think I would count this as "imparting negative spin" to a news item which is actually quite positive for R1 in my opinion. It is certainly not an obvious commentary for an R1 investor to add to the article.

[sikhthetech] 31/1/2017 10:36

The reinvention of publishing: media firms diversify to survive

Falling ad revenues have spurred media companies to find new opportunities in areas such as e-commerce and events

[sikhthetech] 31/1/2017 10:30

1gw, no it can't be because according to your assertions, only negative news, or with a negative spin are posted on here... ;-)

oh look the article is dated 29th Jan... so recent... lol

[sikhthetech] 31/1/2017 10:21

The reinvention of publishing: media firms diversify to survive


Falling ad revenues have spurred media companies to find new opportunities in areas such as e-commerce and events

[barkboo] 31/1/2017 10:20

What's that - BVIC up 32p now? wow. lol I just love skinning traders and rags!

Don't worry - our day will get better here.

[sikhthetech] 31/1/2017 10:13

Six current adtech headaches and what marketers need to do about them

[1gw] 31/1/2017 10:12

P&G move looks like good news for R1 doesn't it? Ahead of the curve?

"The heavily influential marketer's program includes ...requirements that everyone use industry-standard viewability metrics, fraud protection and third-party verification."
(extract from article linked in post 3014)

[barkboo] 31/1/2017 10:05

scaffolders are never wrong - 240p is the correct value!

[sikhthetech] 31/1/2017 10:01

Nestle invites marketing tech startups to pitch for a pilot at ad:tech 2017

"The pitch will give 10 startups the opportunity to be shortlisted; one lucky winner will win a fully funded pilot with Nestlé and the title “The Next Big Thing”"

"For the first time, ad:tech is bringing its global initiative 'The Next Big Thing' to India in collaboration with Nestlé India. The Next Big Thing intends to build a platform that brings entrepreneurs and marketing leaders together and kick start collaborations."

Oh well, who would not want to seek opportunities in India, eh....

[sikhthetech] 31/1/2017 09:51

P&G Tells Digital to Clean Up, Lays Down New Rules for Agencies and Ad Tech to Get Paid

Last month we had Methbot, the biggest fraud to hit online advertising.. and now P&G, the largest advertiser is laying down new rules...

[football] 31/1/2017 09:04

1gw don't get drawn into any arguments you're above it like a few others here here leave it to the nutters like me and keep up the analyst post you do both good and bad views on 1R

[1gw] 31/1/2017 08:40

STT - I'm not trying to suppress anyone's opinions. Just responding to the slightly paranoid (imo) suggestion from you that because a post you didn't like got 4 ticks in a short space of time it must have been by people using multiple ids. By the way, your reaction to that post of loaf's suggests you do rather care what people think of you. That then broadened out into trying to illustrate to you the hypocrisy of some of your posting - claiming to be interested in newsflow while appearing to be rather selective about which news items you post and how you spin them and all the time bombarding us with your conspiracy theories about gangs, multiple ids, manipulative trading etc.

As for disruption, the reason I have tended to post analysis on this thread is that there used to be far less "noise" on this thread than on football's. But personally I find your constant reiteration of evidence-free conspiracy theories disruptive to the thread. And it is time-consuming to say the least trying to provide balance by responding to some of your less-well-thought out negative spins on things.

[barkboo] 31/1/2017 08:09

Yes - that was a bit of luck?

[barkboo] 31/1/2017 07:47

Off piste - a scaffolder stock that has been very kind to me over the years BVIC could see a nice move today?

Gordon - will answer your post on this thread today in detail, and when I get time.

[1gw] 30/1/2017 23:39

Edit - I'll withdraw this post while you finish editing the post I was replying to STT.

[sikhthetech] 30/1/2017 23:30

agaudry,

Thank you - used to post on Pace thread..
;-)


agaudry30 Jan '17 - 20:03 - 3008 of 3010 0 1 Moderate | Ban
From all i've seen and read over a number of years sst is nothing but straight up and a class one contributeh to any number of threads.

[sikhthetech] 30/1/2017 23:22

1gw, think whatever you like... you clearly like to suppress people's opinions... in a similar way others have done for years...
Given you repeat what the same comments as them, you're clearly influenced by them...

I notice you wouldn't mention Football nor Shroder...is that because you're in contact with them??..
Your posts are blinkered and one-sided...

If you don't like my posts, then why not filter me and ignore me... but you won't, you'd rather disrupt this thread, why?..
why don't you stick to what you're good at, company analysis, counter arguments etc....
you're only making a fool of yourself...

Do you really think I or anyone else on here cares what you think about me...
anyway enjoy yet another one of your BS posts in the top 10... lol

I won't be replying to any more of your BS posts targeted at me...

[1gw] 30/1/2017 22:40

STT - I think in the past I've been quite interested in barkboo's posting style haven't I? So no special treatment for you.

But like I do with you I felt there was a marked contrast between how he liked to portray himself and what his posts actually suggested. In his case it was because I felt he was quite clearly trading blinkx (as it then was) while professing disdain for traders. I also had an issue with his aggressive behaviour towards some posters and the "logic gaps" in some of his posts (for example whether or not he had ever sold any of his "core" holding).

Going back to you, you claim to be interested in just posting newsflow about R1 don't you? And yet your posts frequently seem to make references to the "gang" and their alleged activities on R1 and (bizarrely) GKP. You take an article talking about how a succession of small trades might be used to "manipulate" the share price and then seem to imply that whenever there is a succession of small trades on R1 there must be something underhand going on. You are perhaps in my view currently one of the worst offenders in terms of trying to (unfairly) undermine the credibility of other posters - you do it by suggesting that certain of them (although here you never seem to get very specific - just a general spreading of mud hoping some will stick) are in a "gang" and are somehow acting together if not just multiple ids of the same person. In fact, I only got into this particular conversation with you because you were suggesting that someone must have been using multiple id's to tick up one of loaf's posts. And since I knew for a fact that I had voted it up exactly once and probably in the timeframe that concerned you, I thought I would offer that information and at the same time comment on why I thought loaf's post might reasonably have struck a chord and been voted up.

The vast majority of regular posters on these boards are fairly transparent imo (so the issue I had with barkboo and currently have with you doesn't arise). Most appear to be invested, want to see the share price go up and tend to post mainly positive things about the company and positive interpretations of data and events. There are one or two who are openly negative about and hostile to the company, but they don't make any real pretence to be invested (at least with long positions). There are those who appear just to be here for the company and the chance to wind others up. And then there are the slightly odder ones, perhaps, such as Alex, myself and Gowlane, who say they are invested but can't help themselves posting some fairly negative comments and interpretations when the mood takes them. I post like this I think partly because it irritates me to see what I think are false positive interpretations being offered by others, partly in the hope that someone will show me why I am wrong to be negative and partly just to record my thoughts on the investment - I find advfn to be a reasonable filing system if I want to look back and see why I bought or sold at a particular time or what I thought of a certain event. I also find posting to be a useful spur to research.

[geheimnis2] 30/1/2017 21:03

Thanks Woodward

Yes it certainly seems 240p is nailed on here

[football] 30/1/2017 20:57

Loaf the last 2 times your friend next door as sold shares he used the phrase "I've reduced" so you are right he is a seller

[agaudry] 30/1/2017 20:03

From all i've seen and read over a number of years sst is nothing but straight up and a class one contributeh to any number of threads.

[football] 30/1/2017 17:45

good luck WW26