We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Powerhouse Energy Group Plc | LSE:PHE | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B4WQVY43 | ORD 0.5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.05 | 5.00% | 1.05 | 1.00 | 1.10 | 1.125 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 25,509,241 | 15:55:51 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scrap & Waste Materials-whsl | 380k | -46.2M | -0.0111 | -0.95 | 43.65M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/10/2019 14:04 | I see you guys are still hunting in packs. Hilarious! | vatnabrekk | |
01/10/2019 13:49 | Been watching for some time Vat but the disconnect between comments on here and a £7 m mkt cap is difficult to fathom, unless of course the technology is not all that it has been cracked up to be. Toyota seem to have taken a look and made a pretty quick retreat. If their engineers believed in it and delay due to a PP at Protos would be totally irrelevant. | lagosboy | |
01/10/2019 13:26 | Watch this space, lagos boy!! | vatnabrekk | |
01/10/2019 12:54 | Seems odd to me that Phe is still valued at just £7 m. Surely with presumably watertight protected technology more than one suitor would have appeared on the scene by now? £7 m is petty cash to Toyota and they could not care less about PP's. All this planning permission stuff is a load of old baloney, a diversion from the real issue as to why no suitors and why no ability to raise funding to accelerate this technology to market. Nothing adds up here. | lagosboy | |
01/10/2019 12:48 | Vatnabrekk Your are 100o% correct in what you say and very patient with this lot I may say. LOL | smokey 1o3 | |
01/10/2019 11:56 | The point is, Jim, the technology works on the prototype on a smaller scale. The engineers believe that they can scale it up to commercial size and that the technology will work at that level. Peel Environmental and others seem to believe them and are supporting them. No-one can say for certain that it will or will not work at commercial level until the first commercial-sized unit is built, which is what they are working on right now. They cannot build a commercial unit before it is built! So we will all know once that is done. We all know what stage the development is at. And I think we all know and accept that there is a risk, as indeed there is a risk with any company. Even large travel companies can fail. | vatnabrekk | |
01/10/2019 11:34 | Vatnabrekk, we are obviously on a different wavelength, however my argument is self explanatory. PHE can build a hundred plants but if the technology doesent work commercally, what does PHE have other than a story, a story that is so old but is still convincing some people. | luckey jim | |
01/10/2019 10:28 | They have only just submitted the planning application, so they could hardly start building before they get the planning permission, could they now. These things take time, and the steps have all been reported in RNSs and video interviews. So it's not as if we didn't know what progress was being made, and when. And yes there have been delays to the original targets. But we all know about that, so it's not as if the info had been hidden from the public. Next question? | vatnabrekk | |
01/10/2019 10:27 | Vatnabrekk, I think you have left your brain behind. PHE have tried to prove the technology commercially over many years and failed. Without the technology working commercially PHE have nothing. | luckey jim | |
01/10/2019 09:46 | How can it be expected to work commercially when they haven't built the first commercial unit yet? Stating the bleeding obvious! | vatnabrekk | |
01/10/2019 09:16 | All the positive postings on this site are in "Cloud Cuckoo Land". As I have said many times before, the technology does not work commercially. | luckey jim | |
01/10/2019 08:08 | Death spiral finance will be visiting here. | dodge_city | |
01/10/2019 07:43 | How are they a key client? They were just one option out of many. Anyone with a single cell can see the focus is in developing Dmgs for the gasification of plastics at an initial 10 sites in the uk.Did wrightbus contribute any money worthy of then use of significant in your drivel? | slartybartfaster | |
30/9/2019 00:22 | Ken, Mushrooms and lemmings. | smokey 1o3 | |
29/9/2019 23:59 | Lemmings and mushrooms only. | ken chung | |
29/9/2019 15:45 | Significant shareholders schedule out if date on the website. When will the company update it to comply with Aim regulations as it should be no more than 6 months old. | nelson5100 | |
29/9/2019 11:46 | Investors with vision only. | tenapen | |
29/9/2019 11:44 | Thursday's CWR results will be more than interesting. Dearth of news on the hydrogen economy in the Sunday Business sections. Green gas, biomethane, gets a mention in the Sunday Times. Thanks to vatnabrekk I am relaxed on PHE and happy to wait until the pilot project is up and running before any site visit. That may be well into next year. Investors in the hydrogen economy can be patient. It will be massive. | zeppo | |
29/9/2019 11:39 | vatnabrekk you sound desperate. | deccer1 | |
29/9/2019 11:26 | Now Wright Bus is in administration it becomes easier to sell on and the Chinese may well still be interested in it, particularly because of the fit it has for fuel cells with CWR. Lets wait and see but it is an attractive proposition for them to get a further foothold here in the UK. Good all round. | smokey 1o3 | |
29/9/2019 10:59 | Filter and ignore as appropriate. | zeppo |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions