We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Powerhouse Energy Group Plc | LSE:PHE | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B4WQVY43 | ORD 0.5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.025 | 2.70% | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 0.925 | 0.925 | 0.93 | 2,871,429 | 16:35:10 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scrap & Waste Materials-whsl | 380k | -46.2M | -0.0111 | -0.83 | 38.25M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
26/8/2019 08:10 | I wonder what these people think PHE would use this huge 35%/66% placing for "very soon"? Why do they think they need such a lot of money, what are they going to spend it on "very soon"? | vatnabrekk | |
26/8/2019 07:38 | Suck up your dilution. | deccer1 | |
26/8/2019 07:23 | And of course with the price below 0.5 p, the nominal value of the share, they can't raise any money anyway. Ironically for the shorters the price will have to go up before any placing would be announced. Now that is funny.... | nobbygnome | |
26/8/2019 07:14 | What a laugh. | deccer1 | |
25/8/2019 22:02 | Oh dear not a good article for PHE on Share Projects. Share price is still drifting downwards. | nelson5100 | |
23/8/2019 22:29 | Peel Environmental are supporting development on a number of sites but not financing the first commercial project. Japanese visitors expressed approval of the project: but even with the weak pound they have not, so far, put much needed development cash in. Until there is a cash injection this will languish. Let's hope we get that positive RNS very soon. This could rocket or sadly become a damp squib. | zeppo | |
23/8/2019 17:32 | Clue is in your name lagos... | slartybartfaster | |
23/8/2019 08:55 | The clue is in the share price | lagosboy | |
22/8/2019 22:25 | I missed this article a month ago. Didn't exactly put a rocket under the share price though! | spawny100 | |
21/8/2019 18:51 | Cue more angst.... | nobbygnome | |
21/8/2019 18:49 | Oh and you did say 'due diligence' without any qualification had definitely not been done. 100% wrong! | nobbygnome | |
21/8/2019 18:47 | LOL an AGM in front of about 30 people is hardly 'in private'! You are sounding increasingly desperate. I would close your short if I was you; then your life might not be so full of angst! | nobbygnome | |
21/8/2019 18:20 | Well done Jack, slightly less angst. You did say that 'due diligence' (no more defined than that) had definitely not been done so you are 100% wrong but we will leave that for now! I had a very interesting conversation with the Chairman who has been with the company for 18 months. He said when he arrived the company was not focused and wasting lots of money which he blamed on Keith. He said now that David has taken over the company has been transformed, reigned back the spending and is completely focussed on delivering on the goals in a financially expedient manner. So here is your problem Jack. The company has changed! You are harping back to previous times when I am sure a lot of what you say is based in some truth. However, the company is a completely different beast now and you have to come to terms with that or you are going to lose in a big way on your short! Investing like driving is not a good idea if done by looking in the rear view mirror...... | nobbygnome | |
21/8/2019 17:20 | Move and get over your previous loss, we don't care, supersulk. Man up offs and spend what time you have making sure you don't make the same mistakes. Let the big boys take up the slack. Watch you don't step on the lip on the way out. Take Ken and barbi with you...sorry, Jackie, sorry, Jak. | slartybartfaster | |
21/8/2019 16:48 | One with some chance of success. Their anticipated take-on is 500,000 tonnes/year of household waste, which is much more in line with the usual economics for such plants. I see phe has increased the initial size from the original absurd 25tpd but they're still woefully sub-scale given the magnitude of the fixed overheads. | supernumerary | |
21/8/2019 15:19 | >> Jack Without blowing a gasket, can you now agree that potential financial partners have done thorough due diligence on PHE? Yes or no... | nobbygnome |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions