Powerhouse Energy Share Discussion Threads

[vatnabrekk] 28/8/2019 07:52

What is this nonsense about W2T taking 50% of the revenues? Where on earth does it say that in any RNS?

[ken chung] 28/8/2019 04:23

vatnavtekk is in a state of denial and suffering from confirmation bias. In other words displaying the characteristic of a typical lemming and mushroom. It looks to me like PHE deliberately allowed themselves to become vassels to related party private company W2T, set up by the same person who set up PHE and who will take 50% of the revenues. If I was running PHE, I would be doing that work myself and keeping those revenues for PHE shareholders. No one has ever managed to satisfactorily justify W2T's involvement as far as I can see. Why oh why oh why?And they won't have a full size commercial unit up and running this year will they, same as last year and the year before. There goes another missed deadline.

[supernumerary] 27/8/2019 22:04

Nobby - you're missing the point. I'm not 'suggesting they are lying' - I'm suggesting that what they are saying may not be true.

You agree that my view could be right, but offer no way to check. It may work for you, but 'the whites of their eyes' cuts no ice with me, nor I suggest with most rational investors. Where are the hard facts?

Remember the proverb - 'trust, but verify'.

Regarding 'the sake of the planet' how do you think phe might achieve more than Plasma Power, who are clearly much more respected by their engineering peers?

[nobbygnome] 27/8/2019 21:34

>> supernumerary

Of course I don't know everything they said is true....but conversely having not been there you are suggesting they are lying with absolutely no evidence. At least I was there and saw the whites of their eyes. You weren't! The Chairman didn't need to say anything to me and so I trust what he said. I have already stated there is clearly risk here but I am certain after the AGM that the management are determined and focused on delivery. They may or may not succeed...but you pays your money and takes your chance either way. But let's deal with facts and not hearsay from keyboard warriors!

Let's hope for the sake of the planet that they succeed. Cue explosion from Jack.....

[supernumerary] 27/8/2019 20:59

Nobby - but how do you know what they're saying is true? How do you distinguish between:

Case 1 - the chairman is speaking from his true belief supported by concrete evidence, that all is well and commercial success is imminent, and

Case 2 - the chairman knows the odds are 99% against, but doesn't want to be the first to say the emperor has no clothes?

You can't just front up at an AGM and believe everything you're told, so how do you check?

[zeppo] 27/8/2019 19:17

Nobbygnome


Thank you!

[nobbygnome] 27/8/2019 18:46

>> Zeppo

I completely and utterly agree. There was so much positive information at the AGM that as you say it is definitely a hold. Yes there is still risk that they can deliver the functioning units but that is a risk worth taking. Most important for me was my discussion with the Chairman who said that the company had become much more focused in the last 18 months and he is now confident they will deliver as a result.

But of course the bashers behind their keyboards who have never attended a PHE meeting in their lives know better....

[zeppo] 27/8/2019 18:38

A senior representative of W2T was at the AGM.

We were able to chat to him.

I am content to hold
my investment in PHE.

Other posters who attended the AGM also seem content to hold.

Serial 'knockers', 'carpers' and 'whingers' are unlikely to be shareholders.

They should be filtered.

[vatnabrekk] 27/8/2019 17:08

You know the answers yourself nelson don't you.
You're just a tease, aren't you.

[nelson5100] 27/8/2019 16:39

Oh dear surely all the tampers could name one project which W2T has successfully implemented?

Why has PHE selected them as a partner if not for their success??

[zeppo] 27/8/2019 14:29

superbarnet


Agreed!

They do not merit response or comment.

[superbarnet] 27/8/2019 13:44

The filter works well on all the usual suspects

[nelson5100] 27/8/2019 13:44

Ah Nobby , could you name which projects W2T has successfully implemented?

Could you name their customer so I can see the impact on their finances and looking forward compare this to PHE having similar success.

To save you much effort only one project will be necessary.

Thank you.

[nobbygnome] 27/8/2019 11:42

And vatnabrekk is correct; the company is now much more focussed on delivery and so it is pointless navel gazing about the past which is what the bears love to do!

[nobbygnome] 27/8/2019 11:41

Talk about confirmation bias behaviour I think you are the absolutely classic example of that Jack!!!!

[vatnabrekk] 27/8/2019 10:59

Some posters keep going back into history. I would much rather try to look forward because if I'm going to get any returns from this investment it will be from what's going on now, and what happens from now on, not what did or didn't happen in the past.

[nobbygnome] 27/8/2019 10:47

For one they bought in Peel. I really give up about the misinformation spread by the bears. It is endless...

[nelson5100] 27/8/2019 08:01

What resources does W2T have which PHE doesn't have, please can you list and identify them?

[nobbygnome] 27/8/2019 07:00

More rubbish from the bashers. W2T are an essential part of the process. PHE do no have the resources to go,out an dsell the technology. That is the role which W2T are performing and the whole process could not proceed without it.

[vatnabrekk] 26/8/2019 23:29

I believe that PHE retain the right to participate in any of the SPVs if the wish, if they have the funds.

[deccer1] 26/8/2019 23:19

????????????????????????????

[vatnabrekk] 26/8/2019 22:35

Both simultaneously, I should think.
Not an unusual situation where an accountant or other senior manager or director works for two or more related companies.