We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Powerhouse Energy Group Plc | PHE | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.014 | -2.15% | 0.636 | 16:35:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.625 | 0.60 | 0.625 | 0.636 | 0.65 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| ALTERNATIVE ENERGY |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 14/3/2025 17:34 by jaknife £1.25m Placing, Options Grant, Retail Offer & TVRVatnabrekk, Are you regretting your Confirmation bias now? 1. You dissed the ShareProphets article but if you’d read it, then you would have seen that it says in the penultimate paragraph: ”Powerhouse Energy had just £2.7 million of cash at the interim stage on 30 June last year and it burnt about £2.5 million of cash in the 2023 calendar year (including capex). At best I estimate that it has enough cash to get to the end of June 2025. However, it has just built a brand new shiny machine in Bridgend, South Wales, which will have added to the capex and cash burn. I suspect that Powerhouse may already be running on fumes and will want to pass the begging bowl around very soon!” If you'd read it then you too would have been pre-warned about the imminent bail-out placing, just like the ShareProphets' readership. 2. You circulated the LongSpur “article&rdquo What is the point in reading such PR 💩 if it doesn’t tell you the really important stuff? Do you get it yet Vatnabrekk? You lapped up the LongSpur article but dismissed the ShareProphets one completely out of hand. You made the wrong decision about what to read! JakNife |
Posted at 12/3/2025 11:32 by jaknife vatnabrekk,"A little bit of info for those who choose to believe the Shareprophets negative rubbish:" I would make two points: 1. You haven't read the ShareProphets' article and so are not in a position to assert whether it is "rubbish" or "world class amazing research". 2. Powerhouse Energy not only paid LongSpur to write that "article" but they also re-wrote the bits that they didn't like! It would therefore be remarkable if it doesn't say anything other than "PHE is the best company in the world!" Your post reveals a lot about you that you are (a) willing to dismiss articles that you haven't even read, and (b) lap up as gospel sycophantic articles. You should see a doctor quick, as you have a medical condition known as "Confirmation bias": JakNife |
Posted at 10/3/2025 21:51 by ken chung Thank you Evil and Tom:hxxps://shareprophet DYNAMITE EXPOSE: Powerhouse Energy seeks to bamboozle its own shareholders By Evil Banksta | Monday 10 March 2025 Last Tuesday Powerhouse Energy (PHE) held a Capital Markets Day at its facility in Bridgend, South Wales. As tempting as the offer to visit Wales was I didn’t attend (but I look forward to seeing all of you at Tom’s Welsh hovel in September). Judging from the photographs and videos in the Telegram Group, about 40 investors attended to watch Powerhouse demonstrate its Distributed Modular Generation (DMG) Waste to Energy technology. The demonstration was a failure! |
Posted at 10/3/2025 20:44 by vatnabrekk Graham, the film and the reports from attendees are in the Telegram's PHE private bulletin board, of which I am a member, so I can't copy anything from there, but if you want to see it then you will need to ask to join.PHE have never claimed that the DMG can process mixed waste, it has always been made clear that it can process many different kinds of waste but only one kind at a time. The reason for that is that the conditions eg temperature qty of steam etc. vary for different materials in order to maximise the quality of the syngas. That has been known for many years since they were operating the prototype in Thornton Park, which is where all of the processing data originated. Your analogy of running a car on dirty petrol or clean petrol is not valid in this case. The kind of contaminates that PHE claims the DMG can cope with is any type of carbohydrates, so that if plastic wrappers are contaminated by food particles, that doesn't matter because the contaminates will be gasified into syngas along with the plastic. Those contaminates will not affect the operation of the DMG, but dirty petrol will affect the running of a car. But they wouldn't mix shredded tyres with plastic because the operating settings for these two materials would be different. Also they have never claimed that they could process mixed household waste, partly because of the explanation I have given above, and partly because mixed household waste will undoubtedly contain some materials that simply cannot be gasified such as metals. The actual materials that will be tested for potential customers will depend upon whatever the customer wants, whatever it is that the customer intends to process through their DMG. That could be a variety of plastics, shredded tyres, old clothing etc. It will be materials that would otherwise go to landfill or for incineration, built into a waste mountain or be thrown into a river, or into the ocean. There is plenty of that in the Far East and elsewhere in the world. But it will not be any waste materials that can be recycled or reused. |
Posted at 07/3/2025 14:38 by jaknife Smokey 1o3,"As I understand it on the shareholders day it was made clear that poly plastic pellets were being used as they are still optimising the unit. Using a “native” polymer meant they could be 100% sure of the polymer composition going in and therefore use it to optimise the Syngas composition out." If that's what the company told you then they are lying. There has always been a problem with making sure that no oxygen gets into the unit and the way that PHE have dealt with that is by carefully controlling the feedstock that they put in. I would remind you of my prediction in post 22,658 "I have little doubt that PHE will be able to make it appear that something is working in front of shareholders, after all they have done that before. Back in 2017 PHE demonstrated the "G3-UHt" prototype to shareholders to get them rabidly salivating, so much so that multiple placings followed. However, the "G3-UHt" prototype only ever worked on pure (non-waste) feedstock and never functioned commercially. In total PHE have been building waste to gas units since 2002 (page 14 of AIM Admission document). 22 years of complete and utter ineptitude later, multiple false RNSs, numerous wild claims of sales that never actually materialised and not a single commercial functioning unit has ever been produced. It seems reckless to assume that PHE will be able to do anything more than they've done before - demonstrate a unit to the baying crowd in order to raise some funds and then run off with the money for seven years before coming back to fleece the crowd again ... just like last time!" JakNife |
Posted at 07/3/2025 11:10 by vatnabrekk That's not a valid criticism at this stage of the process, JakNife, as you well know. These materials were being used for convenience for the purpose of testing and demonstration as they are readily available in small quantities.For commercial applications of the DMG the feedstock will depend upon whatever the customer and operator of the plant requires, as it is currently not the intention of PHE to be the owner and operator, but to licence the technology. Of course that could change in some circumstance. In any case, it has been stated many times by PHE that when the DMG plants are operating commercially it is the intention that they will process non-recyclable materials only. I'm sure you are aware of the vast quantities of plastics and tyres that still go to landfill or get thrown into the oceans, and in the case of tyres there are massive mountains of tyres in the Middle East and probably in many places throughout the world. If the DMG technology can assist in any small way to reduce this pollution it should be welcomed and not criticised needlessly, which is really not helpful. |
Posted at 05/3/2025 23:43 by smokey 1o3 YES THE australians to have the technology on license.The plan is for aviox to buy two units of the same size of the one in the Test Centre, Just to remind "PHE will work with Avioxx on its pilot scale facility, Project Eden, which is expected to produce 200 tonnes per annum of SAF. The companies are currently investigating the potential of PHE providing two 2.5 tonne per day gasification trains to supply the raw syngas to feed the facility. The 2.5 tonne per day units are based upon the Powerhouse's Feedstock Testing Unit at the Company's Technical Centre in Bridgend. These units will be sold to Avioxx". |
Posted at 04/3/2025 10:51 by schofi2 Says it all really.About Powerhouse Energy Group Plc Powerhouse has developed a process technology which can utilise waste plastic, end-of-life-tyres, and other waste streams to convert them efficiently and economically into syngas from which valuable products such as chemical precursors, hydrogen, electricity, heat and other industrial products may be derived. PHE's process produces low levels of safe residues and requires a small operating footprint, making it suitable for deployment at enterprise and community level. PHE also incorporates Engsolve Ltd, which is a revenue generating business offering Engineering Services across all sectors, with speciality services in the development of new technologies and clean energy. |
Posted at 23/12/2024 23:05 by vatnabrekk I think Protos is dead in the water.It was certainly a fantastic initiative of Peel's initially to have a "Plastic Park" where all forms of plastic could be sorted into recyclable and non-recyclable, where the recyclable plastic could be recycled, and the non-recyclable converted into syngas and/or electricity and/or hydrogen. But so far it hasn't worked. The required infrastructure hasn't been built and very few of the sites have been taken up. Peel were going to build a hydrogen refuelling station for the trucks and other vehicles that would be using the site. But that hasn't happened. Then there was going to be a carbon capture system to be used by all of the businesses on the site, with a network pumping the CO2 into dead oil wells in Liverpool Bay. That hasn't happened so far, although it may still be on the cards sometime. Initially Peel were going to build a DMG on Plot 10B in the Protos Park and operate it, and pay a technology fee of £500k per annum to PHE. They were going to build a DMG on 11 of their Parks!! They actually got planning permission for the DMG at Protos, and also permission for one on Clydeside in Scotland. But the local population at Clydeside organised a protest because they feared the DMG would pollute the atmosphere, because they believed it was really an incinerator. The protestors were supported by the Sottish Greens and Friends of the Earth as well as the SNP Scottish government, so in the end Peel gave up and withdrew the planning application. At Protos, Peel decided they didn't want to put up their own money to build a DMG so they sought funding. That failed. Then a 50/50 JV was established between Peel and PHE, and they both went out looking for funding. That also failed. Then PHE acquired 100% of the JV company at Protos so that they could be in control of their own destiny, with an option to lease Plot 10B from Peel to install a DMG. But they were unable to get a feedstock contract from any waste management company, and they were unable to get an off-take agreement for the hydrogen, so they were unable to raise the required funding. And that's where PHE's Protos project stands today. They still own 100% of the JV company, they still have planning permission unless it has expired, and they still have an option to lease Plot 14B from Peel. There is no infrastructure on Plot 14B, and no plant & machinery associated with the project. But it is a registered company called "Protos Plastics to Hydrogen No.1 Limited". There needs to be more waste management companies taking up Plots in the Protos Plastic Park before PHE can contemplate starting any form of construction. At the moment the whole Park seems to be in limbo and I'm not convinced that is going to change any time soon. That's why I keep saying forget Protos, there are several better opportunities for PHE elsewhere that are more likely to become the FOAK for PHE. Here's a link to the Protos Park web site. |
Posted at 16/12/2024 15:09 by jaknife Smokey 1o3,"Well you don't have to wait long we will all find out in January won't we." I have deleted my post 22,656, upon reflection it doesn't make the point that I was aiming at clearly enough. Let me try again ... I have little doubt that PHE will be able to make it appear that something is working in front of shareholders, after all they have done that before. Back in 2017 PHE demonstrated the "G3-UHt" prototype to shareholders to get them rabidly salivating, so much so that multiple placings followed. However, the "G3-UHt" prototype only ever worked on pure (non-waste) feedstock and never functioned commercially. In total PHE have been building waste to gas units since 2002 (page 14 of AIM Admission document). 22 years of complete and utter ineptitude later, multiple false RNSs, numerous wild claims of sales that never actually materialised and not a single commercial functioning unit has ever been produced. It seems reckless to assume that PHE will be able to do anything more than they've done before - demonstrate a unit to the baying crowd in order to raise some funds and then run off with the money for seven years before coming back to fleece the crowd again ... just like last time! JakNife |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
