Powerhouse Energy Share Discussion Threads

[scrutable] 09/10/2019 14:43

I have been interested in PHE for several years and twice took a six-figure holding, when the price was about 2p, held for a year but found the actual stste of Allaun's version unconvincing and his hopes for success unjustified as I did for those of Warwick his most persistent supporter. I sold out twice, but still believed it could be worth waiting on the sidelines patiently.for a break through................

I still believe that the world desperstely needs a solution for this Waste to Energy problem, but am still not confident that the new management has found the answer. CEO Ryan' s assertions at the AGM, and current presentation material are certainly more confident and the 'contracts' more impressive, the potential still greater but will someone please convincingly tell me that one kilo of Hydrogen has yet been gathered and sold/ and that the lab model has run one or two full work shifts continuously for a whole day without breaking down.

I have never shorted a share. I believe it be close to criminality to do so. It destroys other people's wealth. I still await a credible report by a scientifically competent person of having attended a real production shift, or with my attention elsewhere on CWR, ITM, OXB etc have I missed it and am now behind positive events?

[cmackay] 06/10/2019 11:32

I shared the Twitter link on Tuesday so it's at least that long

[vatnabrekk] 06/10/2019 11:12

This might be a better link:

[zeppo] 06/10/2019 08:50

Can any one say when this went on the CNN site?

'How plastic waste is being turned into clean hydrogen - cnn.com

How plastic waste is being turned into clean hydrogen Powerhouse Energy CEO David Ryan discusses his company's mission to turn plastic waste into clean hydrogen. Source: CNN'

I find difficulty getting the sound track.

[zeppo] 03/10/2019 12:23

Another filter

[cmackay] 03/10/2019 09:45

Health and Safety Executive says:-
"HSE's Advice: Do Not Advise Against, consequently, HSE does not advise, on safety grounds,
against the granting of planning permission in this case."

Top 2 documents dated 2 Oct

[smokey 1o3] 02/10/2019 15:21

Zeppo
You are 100% right in your overall assessment.
Thank you.

[vatnabrekk] 02/10/2019 14:38

It could be worthwhile having a read of the planning application submitted by Peel and W2T. A lot of interesting detail in there. I think I can now understand why the application was delayed by about a month, I suspect it related to alterations that were required as they decided to go for a 35 tons/day DMG unit from the outset, rather than a 25 tons/day one.

[zeppo] 02/10/2019 14:13

vatnabrekk, I believe, as well as I attended the AGM.

We will await events.

[lagosboy] 02/10/2019 12:39

zeppo- whilst attacking the messenger rather than the message is your prerogative I think it would serve you better to follow Gimme's advice and dig a little deeper.

[zeppo] 01/10/2019 22:04

lagosboy

Look at CWRs results out Wednesday 2nd Oct. 2019.

CWR has been through difficult times in the past. The present directors have transformed it.

The future of a company is not always limited by its past history.

What doesn't 'ad up' is an investor in a company slagging it off.

Are you actually an investor in PHE?

If not,what do you get out of making negative posts?

What certainly does not 'add up' is non-investors attempting to undermine a company.

Investing in the stock market is a risky business.

Actual investors are aware of that.

Those investors who actually attend AGMs can make up their own minds.

[lagosboy] 01/10/2019 21:00

So the pioneering technology has a value of £7 m ! KA used to say the same thing until he disappeared.

As I said, something does not add up here.

[lagosboy] 01/10/2019 16:44

Just like Phe, the pack argument is flawed - the only group even closely warranting the label 'pack' are all on the bull side.

[dodge_city] 01/10/2019 14:22

People are suffering, people are dying.

[vatnabrekk] 01/10/2019 14:04

I see you guys are still hunting in packs.
Hilarious!

[lagosboy] 01/10/2019 13:49

Been watching for some time Vat but the disconnect between comments on here and a £7 m mkt cap is difficult to fathom, unless of course the technology is not all that it has been cracked up to be. Toyota seem to have taken a look and made a pretty quick retreat.

If their engineers believed in it and delay due to a PP at Protos would be totally irrelevant.

[vatnabrekk] 01/10/2019 13:26

Watch this space, lagos boy!!

[lagosboy] 01/10/2019 12:54

Seems odd to me that Phe is still valued at just £7 m. Surely with presumably watertight protected technology more than one suitor would have appeared on the scene by now? £7 m is petty cash to Toyota and they could not care less about PP's.

All this planning permission stuff is a load of old baloney, a diversion from the real issue as to why no suitors and why no ability to raise funding to accelerate this technology to market.

Nothing adds up here.

[smokey 1o3] 01/10/2019 12:48

Vatnabrekk
Your are 100o% correct in what you say and very patient with this lot I may say.
LOL

[vatnabrekk] 01/10/2019 11:56

The point is, Jim, the technology works on the prototype on a smaller scale. The engineers believe that they can scale it up to commercial size and that the technology will work at that level. Peel Environmental and others seem to believe them and are supporting them. No-one can say for certain that it will or will not work at commercial level until the first commercial-sized unit is built, which is what they are working on right now.

They cannot build a commercial unit before it is built! So we will all know once that is done. We all know what stage the development is at.

And I think we all know and accept that there is a risk, as indeed there is a risk with any company. Even large travel companies can fail.