Powerhouse Energy Share Discussion Threads

[vatnabrekk] 29/8/2018 17:27

Nelson, it wasn't because they objected to anyone raising criticism. You know this very well because you raise this point constantly and it is not the reason that other posters have objected to the comments that have been posted by yourself and others.

You know this. You know the reasons but you are just twisting it.

These BBs are for people to air their views and for discussion between people with different views. Surely you cannot claim in all honesty that some posters have had others thrown off because they didn't want anyone posting views that they didn't agree with. Really? Do you really, honestly believe that? Do you think that lse would have barred you and the other one if that was the reason given?

[mertymcs] 29/8/2018 07:09

I have not had any response to my email I sent a few weeks ago.Will resend and if I do not get any sort of reply then that is poor from the company.

[superg1] 29/8/2018 00:35

The 3% post was a baited hook.

It looked to me like Waste2 would be selling the shares to keep the lights on there.

So the pro PHE guys are saying the waste2/PHE boys keeps the plates spinning by doing a deal with PHE to take £20k per month in shares.

Of course investor are taking their word for it that the Waste2 guys haven't sold more than in the conditions. A quick check of the share register would sort how many they hold currently.


hmmmm.

[vatnabrekk] 28/8/2018 16:05

As I have said on these BBs countless times, I have no problem with sensible arguments against the company or the technology or its past history, and actually I agree with some of those, although not all. I am not not a ramper, nor am I suggesting that this project will be a certain success story because I am very much aware that there are many risks and mountains to climb. I try to consider the pros and cons in a balanced way.

But I am fed up with the tone of the comments that appear on here from some posters, totally negative, totally polarised, no compromise and no appetite for discussion. It seems to me that some are more concerned with scoring points off other posters rather than considering the merits or otherwise of the company or its technology.

And I certainly don't like the personal attacks that some posters make on others, and indeed on the management of the company. None of that is constructive whichever way you look at it, and I'm sure it's not the purpose of these BBs.

[vatnabrekk] 27/8/2018 21:18

Seems to me it's a waste of time trying to hold a sensible discussion on this BB.

[deccer1] 27/8/2018 19:01

At least PHE CEO and directors bought shares earlier this year.

[deccer1] 27/8/2018 18:53

I could be wrong or I could be right.

[vatnabrekk] 25/8/2018 22:55

Funny, lagosboy seems to have taken a break as well. Perhaps they're on a pub crawl together.

[nelson5100] 24/8/2018 20:14

Perhaps he could look at his fortnightly share register which he said the company sends and see how many shares are held by W2T.

[vatnabrekk] 22/8/2018 19:01

I have always said I have concerns about various things, but not about the integrity of the directors.

So, your haven't answered my question...

[lagosboy] 22/8/2018 18:56

vatnabrekk - you mention the word scam not me, perhaps despite your denial you do have some concerns after all.

The agreement may expire but it is open for renewal.

[vatnabrekk] 22/8/2018 16:31

"KA has only recently granted options to himself"

Not really. That sort of decision has to made by the Board, not by an individual director.

"what is to stop W2T issuing shares to the directors in the future?"

Well, nothing of course, but why would they? What would be the point in transferring income or profit from PHE to W2T and then increasing their W2T fees or shares just to get the benefit? Why not just get the benefit from PHE?

Just so I'm clear and to make sure I've got this right: Are you suggesting that PHE shareholders should be aware of the possibility that two of PHE's directors may set up some scam system in the future using W2T in order to do the PHE shareholders out of their future profits?

[lagosboy] 22/8/2018 13:06

vatnabrekk- you seem to be of the view that only shareholders in W2T stand to benefit from the arrangement with Phe. Surely directors receive remuneration and bonuses and what is to stop W2T issuing shares to the directors in the future?

KA has only recently granted options to himself for circa 8% of Phe, and at rock bottom prices and without any incentive by way of staggering them - although sadly for him they remain underwater. Did Ryan get some options, to offset against the cost of his recent purchase at a 40% premium, - which incidentally in all my years I have never seen before. ?

[vatnabrekk] 22/8/2018 11:08

The bit that I don't get is this, if the only work that they are doing is on behalf of PHE, then what is the purpose of their existence as a separate company? Surely in that case it would make more sense to have the essential staff as employees of PHE.

Now that's something that I would say needs clarification, rather than the concerns that some folks have about two directors sitting on both Boards.

[mertymcs] 22/8/2018 10:51

I'm not entirely sure, possibly an explanation of the work w2t are carrying out to justify the payment as it seems to me they are there to investigate potential sites and areas etc along with technical support but no real details have been provided for that it is they are exactly doing.

[vatnabrekk] 22/8/2018 10:47

Yes, Mert, I would certainly expect that, because as far as I know they have no other income.

By the way, what sort of answer are you hoping for, that would entice you to keep your investment here?

[mertymcs] 22/8/2018 09:48

I get a feeling that w2t is a regular seller of £9800 worth of shares every month