![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oxus Gold | LSE:OXS | London | Ordinary Share | GB0030632714 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 3.125 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
16/12/2015 08:45 | If we win i will be retiring only because i got sooooo old while waiting. Getting older by the day. | luckyman3 | |
16/12/2015 08:29 | The way some are talking on here i thought we had already won. They are just re-counting the money now. | luckyman3 | |
16/12/2015 08:20 | We have to win first..... | ![]() jaf1948 | |
16/12/2015 08:20 | Morning All | ![]() marmar80 | |
16/12/2015 08:15 | 25p - 50p range IMHO, but anything over 3.5p is a profit LOL. | ![]() wulber | |
16/12/2015 08:13 | lower and lower expectations lol..... bet no one envisaged this when they punted here years ago. | ![]() kcowe | |
16/12/2015 08:08 | Good morning Giant Steps and all If OXS wins then an share price of 5p or more would give me a far better gain than most investments these days. | ![]() maytrees | |
16/12/2015 08:06 | My calculations now point to £1.32 pence. | ![]() thehitman1 | |
16/12/2015 08:02 | 12-15p most likely imo anything more would be big bonus! | ![]() blueblood | |
16/12/2015 07:59 | Im thinking around 20p - 40p mark | luckyman3 | |
16/12/2015 07:13 | I'm also in the 15p-20p camp though anything in double figures will do for me. | 99jeremiah | |
16/12/2015 00:16 | About right for 7p or 8p | wide boy | |
15/12/2015 23:49 | pp..with your $150 mill or £100 mill ... award .. not much is going to be left for shareholders after the lawyers take their percentage chunk. | ![]() kcowe | |
15/12/2015 23:47 | Hi Westie in for a few more here whilst oil gets played by the OPEC fools.... | ![]() blueblood | |
15/12/2015 23:45 | pf..... hence the low share price... markets realistic low expectations. | ![]() kcowe | |
15/12/2015 23:42 | A 500 page document that will never be made public! | pennys2pounds | |
15/12/2015 23:38 | Old Stiggy!.. Love you too. You don't get away with ignoring Oxus past statements by saying "Yawn" and postig an irrelevant chart...how poor! Just one last thing, Nick et al, I still believe the clues to Quantum in our case are right before our eyes (IF we win).. There are very obvious markerts IMO here - Newmont $80Million (lowball) RBS finanace was to be $150Million and Chinese Finanace was to be $185Million.. These are the ballpark figures where this is going IMO | ![]() pennyfalls | |
15/12/2015 23:27 | yawn people arguing endlessly about things they haven't got a clue about it's the arbitration panel which will make the judgement and the best expert guide on valuation has come from E&Y who are professionals who are trained in research, analysis, evaluation etc | ![]() the stigologist | |
15/12/2015 23:05 | Cheers and good luck too PF. As papillon says, it's wait and see time with the experts making the decisions with their reasoning contained in what will probably be a 500 plus page document. | ![]() nick2412 | |
15/12/2015 23:00 | Anyway, I'll leave you all to your love in again. Tick ups for the believers, but not for the FACTS. You're picking out points you WANT to believe and dismissing objective rational thinking. Like citing the Yukos case, but not others that lose with similarities. Fair enough Nick, I've enjoyed the debate, and good luck. I am in here, but like challenging my beliefs. Wulber, ApFindley, Dave, Stig, et al...etc etc.. DYOR?? really. Bye for now | ![]() pennyfalls | |
15/12/2015 22:58 | Nick2412 15 Dec'15 - 20:56 - 30415 of 30426 1 0 papillon, yes, the Chinese funding is a good starting point but remember that valuation didn't take into account Khandiza. OXS reluctantly took that expropriation on the chin in the hope they could retain the more advanced AGF project. >>>>> Yes, something for Khandiza would be a bonus as would a punitive award for the Uzbeks nastiness towards OXS. Anyway our opinions don't matter one iota; the only opinions that count are those of the arbitration panel. Fingers crossed they are generous towards OXS. | ![]() papillon | |
15/12/2015 22:57 | NO no no! They DID call them a bunch of crooks in the 2007 Annual reports (an earlier point), so why not later . SO they were being truthful one year but not the next? being truthful sometimes and not at others? How does this play out to lawyers? | ![]() pennyfalls |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions