Oxus Gold Share Discussion Threads

[loverat] 07/10/2015 14:25

Yesterdays comments were made out of frustration and in the context no one took them seriously so no point rechecking everything you post.

Mind you talking of liars, it also follows that so called financial journalists and posters can get away with making up stories and telling outright lies about foreign AIM companies for their own advantage.

Also there are those that make up lies about discounted placings. Seen quite a few threads with comments like that - just today in fact. Some posters who are preaching others here about what they post are involved in this fraud I so hope they don't sell and start posting mistruths here.

[giant steps] 07/10/2015 14:24

O/T

dave - I don't like the inference you make (unsafe), but your choice.

[dave444] 07/10/2015 14:24

There are 2 good outcomes of the RAB sell off in my opinion:
1 - They have less to sell in the future when the award is announced
2 - The RAB fund manager has not sold any of his personal holding throughout the long drawn out RAB sell off.

[dave444] 07/10/2015 14:21

I see no reason to remove any part of my post as i have not accused an individual of any wrongdoing!

[the stigologist] 07/10/2015 14:18

Reesyheli but that is all known knowns in terms of Fundamentals. They are immediately discounted within the share price if you are a Fundamentalist investor. So what is the point of discussing it ? Unless you simply want to engage in a 'debating society' where everybody applauds you for your debating skills and rhetoric ? A bit arrogant of you frankly. Your focus on fundamentals (ie. things that everybody already knows and have discounted) maybe explains why you lost so much in SEA

The technicals on the other hand are dynamic and always changing with the changing demand and supply situation

[reesyheli] 07/10/2015 14:15

Anyone invested here would do well to spend an hour on that, I'm only 70% of the way through but already feel more confident of a favourable outcome.

FWIW she seems to be concerned between the 2004 and 2007 dates for calculating when expropriation occurred.

She seems to accept expropriation has occurred and compensation is due the only sticking point seems to be how it's calculated.

Far more rewarding discussion than what the current MACD is doing

[papillon] 07/10/2015 14:13

25196. Good points, Nick.

[papillon] 07/10/2015 14:12

"Not sure why anybody would care if RAB are selling or not. If they are 'capping' the share price great you can buy more cheaper."

Very true.

[the stigologist] 07/10/2015 14:11

Foreign companies can get away with telling outright lies because FCA has no jurisdiction in places like China / Russia / Stans etc

That is why you need to be wary off foreign companies listing on AIM

[wallyjumblat] 07/10/2015 14:02

Trust me RS is not stupid, and IMO a man of Integrity, nobody has any more info than you or I "PERIOD". People go to jail for that sort of stuff.

[nick2412] 07/10/2015 13:51

Dave, any company that has loaned money would , on the face of it, possibly have a clause that means they have to be notified if a further lender is coming on board. In this instance though clearly RAB haven't got such a clause because with that knowledge that would surely make them insiders and prohibit selling. I guess an important factor here is that the CLN's are not secured. Anyway, I am glad they are out or near enough out.

[giant steps] 07/10/2015 13:51

O/T

dave, probably best to retract the ps part in #25190

[the stigologist] 07/10/2015 13:49

Not sure why anybody would care if RAB are selling or not. If they are 'capping' the share price great you can buy more cheaper. If they are selling out before a 'bad' decision well you also have the ability to sell as well.

[the stigologist] 07/10/2015 13:48

RAB are forced sellers as their fund is in wind down they probably have committed to sell all stocks if certain liquidity conditions met. So if they got called up by the MMs then they would sell. To suggest otherwise is to question RS's integrity which as we saw yesterday is not a wise move.

[dave444] 07/10/2015 13:43

Although the Darwin involvement again is disappointing it cannot be completely unforeseen as RS referred to the possibility in past statements.
The real prize is unchanged apart from a little more dilution.
Let us hope the result is this month!

[the stigologist] 07/10/2015 13:43

Awaiting Merits and Quantum



* Oxus Gold vs Republic of Uzbekistan for alleged expropriation of assets

* Legal funding Calunius on No Win No Fee basis

* Arbitration started 31 August 2011

* May 2014 arbitration hearing completed (see RNS 19 May 2014)
* Claim Range $489m to $1250m (Nov 2012)

[giant steps] 07/10/2015 13:42

One key aspect about the Darwin plug on finances is if Oxus
are in speedy payment negotiations then they are not forced
to discount, unlike Rurelec.

Our time is approaching in the very near future.

[nick2412] 07/10/2015 13:38

99J, yes, a real minefield (no pun intended). Back end of 2010 when the gold price was peaking would be nice. Just on this issue alone it's easy to see why it has taken longer than OXS lawyers anticipated. It's sort of reassuring that it seems likely to have been 'all about quantum'.

[the stigologist] 07/10/2015 13:26

Misappropriated

[99jeremiah] 07/10/2015 13:23

Nick2412 - To muddy the waters further, ours was creeping expropriation from a few years before we threw in the towel in 2011. So rather them than me that has to sort out the whole bag of worms...

[marmar80] 07/10/2015 13:22

jrjr99, no appeal in this case, this is UNCITRAL

[the stigologist] 07/10/2015 13:02

On the weekly chart still looking very constructive