ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

NANO Nanoco Group Plc

19.35
0.41 (2.16%)
01 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Nanoco Group Plc LSE:NANO London Ordinary Share GB00B01JLR99 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.41 2.16% 19.35 18.72 19.98 19.20 18.90 19.18 637,169 16:35:10
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh 5.62M 11.09M 0.0343 5.60 62.09M
Nanoco Group Plc is listed in the Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker NANO. The last closing price for Nanoco was 18.94p. Over the last year, Nanoco shares have traded in a share price range of 15.50p to 23.55p.

Nanoco currently has 323,380,668 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Nanoco is £62.09 million. Nanoco has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 5.60.

Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

Showing 54926 to 54947 of 55075 messages
Chat Pages: 2203  2202  2201  2200  2199  2198  2197  2196  2195  2194  2193  2192  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
17/4/2024
20:12
'TerrorWit17 Apr '24 - 17:20 - 39328 of 39338

For all you know (which isn't much) it might be LOAM's SOP to fully commit to all tender offers. It would be a logical way to treat them.'

So a financial institution has a policy to just accept any tender offer without studying the pros and cons and the possible returns/losses?

You truly are a deluded, nasty little boy....

fat frank
17/4/2024
18:44
You know being stupid is the same as being dead in that you're oblivious to it and it only hurts those around you.

Have a banana!

terrorwit
17/4/2024
18:37
You sound a bit desperate with that poor argument. Cope harder
chilom
17/4/2024
18:31
No, opinion is not speculation. Speculation is speculation. An opinion is based on analysis of the presented facts. Do you think when you ask your doctor for their opinion that they speculate or do they look at the facts?

It's people like you who don''t get this that cause so much bitterness when their so-called opinions turn out to be wrong because they were speculative.

terrorwit
17/4/2024
18:14
An opinion is, essentially, speculation. You seem to find speculation pointless so perhaps you should acknowledge your own request and stop sharing it,otherwise that would be a bit hypocritical and we wouldn't want that.
chilom
17/4/2024
18:08
I do offer my opinions based on what I know and not guesswork - otherwise they would not be my opinions

You can look up the information on which I base my opinions for yourself, mostly in company presentations but bear in mind these include forward looking statements so they are best guidance, not firm predictions.

Anything else is pointless, as we know from past experience. That's my opinion.

terrorwit
17/4/2024
17:47
If you feel speculation is pointless why are you here? The exchange of views and ideas is the entire point of a discussion forum.

Do some "research"? Wouldn't that be speculation in your eyes? After all,we have little knowledge of future plans right now.

So which is it? Do some research to discuss and speculate towards or not? Perhaps you could give us some insight from your own"research"?

chilom
17/4/2024
17:37
I have no inside information and neither do you. All the speculation is pointless at best and damaging at worst. That's why I don't indulge in it and why I suggest you don't either. After all it's hardly ever right as we can see again today.

Please eat your bananas now ... or at least do some research for a change.

terrorwit
17/4/2024
17:34
Mocking others for what you think is a lack of knowledge as part of a statement admitting your own ignorance is an embarrassing new low.

If you want to belittle another at least come from a place of knowledge or insight.

chilom
17/4/2024
17:27
You need to take those rose tinted glasses off and see the reality, ie share price ..
beeezzz
17/4/2024
17:20
Honestly, reading this is like watching feeding time at the monkey house after the keeper's produced a bunch of over-ripe bananas. No wonder you have names like Fat Frank, Barkboo, Unglove and Kooba.

For all you know (which isn't much) it might be LOAM's SOP to fully commit to all tender offers. It would be a logical way to treat them.

Any of you fancy an apple for a change?

terrorwit
17/4/2024
16:50
I can't imagine they'd do that while the buyback is still ongoing.
supernumerary
17/4/2024
15:45
Weatherman they would have to just drip feed back in to avoid spiking the share price over 6 months one to watch I guess via TR-1 notices.
paul planet earth1
17/4/2024
15:43
They may buy back at a lower price, and make themselves a profit.
weatherman
17/4/2024
15:18
Seems likely LOAM will extricate itself from NANO completely using the buyback
unglove
17/4/2024
15:13
Another example of BT's misguidance cash breakeven expected for next year while LOAM try to exit lol!
paul planet earth1
17/4/2024
15:02
I wonder what LOAM's weighted average was? Be interesting to see if they buy back in now that the share price will fall.

Once again this stinks.

fat frank
17/4/2024
14:49
I see LOAM have tendered their whole holding and sold 69% of their shares.53790629 down to 16945289 sharesThey are the smart ones aren't they ??
kooba
17/4/2024
14:49
Lombard reduced its holding from 16.5% to 8.5%.
weatherman
17/4/2024
14:43
There's no controversy around Tenner. It's just you lot trying to invent a trading narrative.

We can see this clearly from how he's been voted back on with the rest of the BoD time and again

None of you are fooling anyone but each other.

------

I'm sorry that Kooba thinks I'm vile. Of course denigrating the CEO of a company on which hundreds, if not thousands, of small investors depend for their pensions, all day every day for the last 16 months isn't at all vile, oh no!.

Indeed thanks to Kooba, I now understand that weaponising public forums where Tenner can't reply is a perfectly reasonable thing to do and I owe him an apology for not understanding that sooner :)

terrorwit
16/4/2024
21:17
Barkbooo

Makes a very accurate and valid point.

We can't be complacent with BT he's down it once, got away with it, and when push comes to shove he is more likely do it again.

That indeed is a controversial issue how far do we as small retail investors trust or distrust his integrity or lack of.

paul planet earth1
16/4/2024
20:58
The idiot keeps stating the majority want BT - no the company’s large investors wanted BT….i wonder why? lol

If the idiot would check out who was buying and selling leading up to the Friday rns, then check BT’s involvement in the rns….(nil) it has a very uneasy feel about it.

There were a lot of small pi’s buying around that time because BT had virtually told the market he had Samsung by the balls….funnily enough the companies large investors chose to do the reverse.and sell.

It was as if they knew something that we didn’t? lol

Just 48 hours later - everything changed, and we had the disappointing rns with BT happy to explain the unexplainable occurrence.

How unlucky for the small pi’s pumping up the share price on that Friday rns - and how lucky for the top investors selling on their money?

It was as if they knew something that we didn’t?

Of course 48 hours later the slippery snake warned that things were not as rosy as they were Friday - then he ran off into hiding…

Job done!

barkbooo
Chat Pages: 2203  2202  2201  2200  2199  2198  2197  2196  2195  2194  2193  2192  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock