ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

NANO Nanoco Group Plc

18.98
-0.37 (-1.91%)
Last Updated: 13:30:23
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Nanoco Group Plc LSE:NANO London Ordinary Share GB00B01JLR99 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.37 -1.91% 18.98 18.74 18.98 19.02 18.98 19.00 376,505 13:30:23
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh 5.62M 11.09M 0.0343 5.53 61.38M
Nanoco Group Plc is listed in the Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker NANO. The last closing price for Nanoco was 19.35p. Over the last year, Nanoco shares have traded in a share price range of 15.50p to 23.55p.

Nanoco currently has 323,380,668 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Nanoco is £61.38 million. Nanoco has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 5.53.

Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

Showing 54901 to 54920 of 55075 messages
Chat Pages: 2203  2202  2201  2200  2199  2198  2197  2196  2195  2194  2193  2192  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
17/4/2024
14:49
Lombard reduced its holding from 16.5% to 8.5%.
weatherman
17/4/2024
14:43
There's no controversy around Tenner. It's just you lot trying to invent a trading narrative.

We can see this clearly from how he's been voted back on with the rest of the BoD time and again

None of you are fooling anyone but each other.

------

I'm sorry that Kooba thinks I'm vile. Of course denigrating the CEO of a company on which hundreds, if not thousands, of small investors depend for their pensions, all day every day for the last 16 months isn't at all vile, oh no!.

Indeed thanks to Kooba, I now understand that weaponising public forums where Tenner can't reply is a perfectly reasonable thing to do and I owe him an apology for not understanding that sooner :)

terrorwit
16/4/2024
21:17
Barkbooo

Makes a very accurate and valid point.

We can't be complacent with BT he's down it once, got away with it, and when push comes to shove he is more likely do it again.

That indeed is a controversial issue how far do we as small retail investors trust or distrust his integrity or lack of.

paul planet earth1
16/4/2024
20:58
The idiot keeps stating the majority want BT - no the company’s large investors wanted BT….i wonder why? lol

If the idiot would check out who was buying and selling leading up to the Friday rns, then check BT’s involvement in the rns….(nil) it has a very uneasy feel about it.

There were a lot of small pi’s buying around that time because BT had virtually told the market he had Samsung by the balls….funnily enough the companies large investors chose to do the reverse.and sell.

It was as if they knew something that we didn’t? lol

Just 48 hours later - everything changed, and we had the disappointing rns with BT happy to explain the unexplainable occurrence.

How unlucky for the small pi’s pumping up the share price on that Friday rns - and how lucky for the top investors selling on their money?

It was as if they knew something that we didn’t?

Of course 48 hours later the slippery snake warned that things were not as rosy as they were Friday - then he ran off into hiding…

Job done!

barkbooo
16/4/2024
19:25
Hi yasX yes I have been posting less on here and generally don't respond to all the outright lies and errors made ..but see what happens when I do post ..serious issues. Got the two of them on block now . I cancelled premium because of stain as they won't remove such vile free accounts, and will not , which is a shame...but they came back with a much lower price as I had been a subscriber for so long , so they have saved me some money! I'm sure they will be pleased.
kooba
16/4/2024
18:57
Stranger things have happened....
beeezzz
16/4/2024
18:38
Kooba,

I have no ide why you continue to entertain the neanderthal. He is only here to seek pleasure from deliberately agitating readers. It is clear he has no investment here, no interest in the Co. and no idea about markets generally.

Perhaps if contributors cease responding time and again he will vanish into thin air and find something more useful to do.

yasx
16/4/2024
18:24
You do that. You're a danger to yourself with all that hubris.

The least accurate poster I've ever encountered - even worse than the moronic Senseman.

terrorwit
16/4/2024
18:14
I'm going to pop you on ignore along with your mate stain because you are nothing.
kooba
16/4/2024
18:13
Accuracy is important ..without it makes your lies.Don't post if you can't get simple facts right.It's a daily job putting you straight.But you are oh so boring ..you are nothing.
kooba
16/4/2024
18:09
>90% of voters voted BT back in. Fact.

But hey why don't you find a few hairs to split so that we might be distracted and forget that you were wrong about

1. The value of the Samsung settlement (by a factor of >10), and,
2. The attitudes of other shareholders towards the BoD, and
2. Hamoodi
and, most recently
4. The share price reaction following the distribution which should be no more than 17p by now according to you.

Just because I don't spend all day posting misguided over-analytical explanations of my thoughts on Nanoco doesn't mean I don't have an opinion. It just means I'm content with their guidance and don't feel the need to obsess over every last word they publish for the sake of blame shifting and puffing myself up on a toxic forum full of ignorant loudmouths like you.

No-one wants you here or on LSE except other trolls. You provide no value to Nanoco or to anyone else.

terrorwit
16/4/2024
17:34
>90% voted BT back in. How do you reconcile this obvious dislocation with your personal narrative?


Resolution 5 To re-elect Brian Tenner as a Director of the Company
Fact >30% of shareholders voted in favour of re-election.

kooba
16/4/2024
13:14
You're clearly confused. How is going into the market to buy related to returning value to shareholders?

It is the same as buying your own business - reducing the number of shares in issue.

nigelpm
16/4/2024
13:00
Btw - now the fat snake has kept the cash and shafted pi’s…..there is some good news on the way.

I’ve heard from a source, news is on the way.

Disclosure: Never took part - still fully invested.

barkbooo
16/4/2024
11:32
You're clearly confused. How is going into the market to buy related to returning value to shareholders?
rp
16/4/2024
11:02
They have returned value - you had a choice whether you wanted to tender or not.
nigelpm
16/4/2024
10:55
My problem is people who don't meet commitments to return value to shareholders. What's yours?
rp
16/4/2024
10:50
Just go into the market and buy then rp - what is your problem?
nigelpm
16/4/2024
10:28
Cash from buyback now in my current account via HL.
We now find what we got is a whisker away from open market. Thanks a bunch Brian Tenner, that really is benefitting shareholders (not).

rp
16/4/2024
10:17
Nothing in mine yet, but then again I've long suspected that they hold on to my cash for as long as possible to collect interest. Probably won't see it till the 26th.
katsy
Chat Pages: 2203  2202  2201  2200  2199  2198  2197  2196  2195  2194  2193  2192  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock