Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[andycapped] 04/3/2017 16:31

Still zero guarantee of any sales.

LG had a prototype TV with Nanoco dots in couple of years back, but it never went beyond that stage.

Nanoco have a saleable product, they need to demonstrate it has a market.

Information from the company since last Summer has been very poor, with little to no updates or any sign of solid commercial deals.

[sd_anon] 04/3/2017 16:12

"Nanoco announced recently that it would be showcasing two prototype QD TVs respectively from Philips and Hisense at CES 2017, January 5-8 in Las Vegas. while partner TCL is presenting its commercialized QD TV at the annual consumer electronic show for the first time. All the TVs use Nanoco patented QD film technology manufactured by Wah Hong." hxxp://www.ledinside.com/news/2017/1/nanoco_showcases_tcl_philips_and_hisense_prototype_tvs_incorporating_its_patented_qd_technology So that's one commercialized TV being supplied by WH. Reasonable evidence I think of real sales and revenue from WH this year. It might not be big money yet but these products are only just being launched. Same with Dow, we know we have revenue, might be small but it's coming.

[andycapped] 04/3/2017 01:00

Nanoco have fallen short of their projected earnings in what, three years? If they do it again this year, then they're going to be in trouble and will need to go out with the begging bowl.

I think that really is the bottom line. If at the end of the month Nanoco are able to demonstrate good levels of cash rolling in, enough to suggest that the seven million predicted will materialize, then I think the share price will recover to the levels we saw in the Summer of 2016 and steadily increase from there.

If not, then the share is likely to go the other direction.

[notimpressed] 04/3/2017 00:12

agreed but nano must have given the brokers figures on which to make the
projection, they cannot just invent them.

[minsky] 04/3/2017 00:05

these are broker forecasts not (necessarily) Nanoco's
you have to take these forecasts with a pinch of salt
as recently as October 2015 several brokers had targets of 260-270p for the company

[notimpressed] 03/3/2017 23:47

if??? nano do achieve their projected earnings of 7.8 million for 2017,
that would or certainly should trigger a sharp rise in the sp,
given they are projecting 21.9 mil for 2018. which would put them
well into the black.
But again there is the nagging doubt, driven by share price drifting, which
asks, if the above is true, surely ii's would have prior knowledge,
and be sucking in any surplus stock, driving the price north at a
rapid rate of knots.

[mrplay] 03/3/2017 21:54

My google alerts for nanoco. Stating new price target but can't find out a price if it is up or down. States strong buy. Can anyone help

[mrplay] 03/3/2017 20:33

Someone asked where i got the project dates from 27/march - hxxp://www.4-traders.com/NANOCO-GROUP-PLC-5273194/calendar/

[roadster750] 03/3/2017 18:16

another late buy of 100k not to be sniffed at

[mrplay] 03/3/2017 17:53

It will be B all the way. Hoping for A. Lots of drivel about how NOW they can keep us more up to date. How now they are doing better than ever, and how they won't need any more funding. Then all of a sudden the share price with be manipulated, it will shoot upwards. People will think something big is happening finally and big buys will take place. Price gets to 75p then the news of fund raising at 50-60p price. As they are so close to signing with the big S or the big L. share price sinks back down to 30. More angry bb posts and Mike will be quiet for the next 6 months. New range of PI's invest at 30p and don't understand what the problem is.

[euroto] 03/3/2017 17:43

Is that a 50/50 on a or b minsky :-))

[minsky] 03/3/2017 17:28

In the interims we will either be told:
a) Wah Hong, Merck or Dow have sold dots/film to actual TV manufacturers, so the revenue pipeline has begun.
b) no sales have been made yet, but there are great prospects for H2 (even if there arent any prospects).
Maybe the market is assuming (b) based on past experience and the fact it will take time for Merck and Wah Hong to tie down quality and price with their customers.
The IP sets a floor for the price.

[petepitstop] 03/3/2017 17:07

If the company was on the point of disintegration we would have had a revenue warning.

[jfacwc] 03/3/2017 16:38

another day of drama bites the dust...

[jfacwc] 03/3/2017 16:07

add one or two others to that list...

[mr.oz] 03/3/2017 16:03

Hendersons may regret that strategy, patiently watching this disintegrate?

[petepitstop] 03/3/2017 15:24

Warren Buffet; 'Shares pass from the impatient to the patient'.

[minsky] 03/3/2017 14:50

An extremely cynical view is that Nanoco's market cap reprepresents £10m cash and £86m hot air. But how much is the IP worth? Samsung recently paid $70m for 250 QD Vision patents. Nanoco hold over 460. Maybe the current share price fairly reflects the IP value.

[balaura] 03/3/2017 14:50

Each time I lost patience and sold, I've lost money. I wonder why that is :-)

[mrplay] 03/3/2017 13:20

Watching nanoco share price -

[jfacwc] 03/3/2017 13:18

Maybe ME has 'ten thousand men...'

[brucie5] 03/3/2017 12:31

It really doesn't want to go below 40p. If things are so dire, I wonder why this is. Doesn't want to go up either. If things are so good, I wonder why that is.

,,
-?

[balaura] 03/3/2017 11:50

Well, somebody is buying stock :)

[roadster750] 03/3/2017 09:46

did a dummy buy at the time and I could buy that amount for 40.375 just had another bash and it went to negotiated trade although could buy 125000 at 40.375
So this mornings 154k trade was a buy and suspect yesterdays after hours 250k trade was also.