ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

MRO Melrose Industries Plc

611.40
6.00 (0.99%)
14 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Melrose Industries Plc LSE:MRO London Ordinary Share GB00BNGDN821 ORD 160/7P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  6.00 0.99% 611.40 613.80 614.20 614.40 600.00 602.80 3,553,789 16:35:24
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Engineering Services 4.93B -1.02B -0.7540 -8.15 8.3B
Melrose Industries Plc is listed in the Engineering Services sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker MRO. The last closing price for Melrose Industries was 605.40p. Over the last year, Melrose Industries shares have traded in a share price range of 445.40p to 681.20p.

Melrose Industries currently has 1,351,475,321 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Melrose Industries is £8.30 billion. Melrose Industries has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -8.15.

Melrose Industries Share Discussion Threads

Showing 9176 to 9197 of 12450 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  378  377  376  375  374  373  372  371  370  369  368  367  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
08/3/2019
12:06
But of course Melrose is different, having made very few redundant and recruiting many for the future.
brexitplus
08/3/2019
11:53
brexit

Rolls Royce have actually been lambasted by some investors BECAUSE their net employee count hasn't lowered that much from what the headlines suggest. They have also recruited thousands gearing up for service and maintenance contracts where the bulk of their future profits will be made.

minerve 2
08/3/2019
11:47
Getting, as usual Porky when backed into a corner changes the subject. Cable, Clegg!!!

Won’t address the subject of RR making thousands redundant to please investors like himself.

And I really would like to know why his “daughter̶1; hangs around bars with older men.

brexitplus
08/3/2019
11:46
Rover, the dog, here.

I'm just sitting here, in MEANWHILE's cotton wool world, alongside one of the cats, the 3-legged one, who just happens to have more brains in its missing leg than getting, brexit & yertiz combined have ever had in their skulls.
There's no itchy fabrics here either.

MRO share price is indeed back to square one, but the company doesn't just have its loyal band of parasitic leeches as shareholders any longer. It has investors acquired with GKN, investing for dividend, investing to support british industry.
The Directors will have to learn that they are serving a different audience now.

meanwhile
08/3/2019
11:23
Isn't it time for your swim yet Porky? Are you getting your budgie-smugglers on?
ROFLMAO!

gettingrichslow
08/3/2019
11:16
So our we down just as much as we were up the other day? ROFLMAO!

Still, who cares, the executives will no doubt cream off millions. The small shareholders will just have to make do with the measly dividend for now.

minerve 2
08/3/2019
11:09
Good guy is Vince, Clegg is a good guy too.
minerve 2
08/3/2019
11:08
Vince Cable knew what it was all about. He has far more business experience than any of us on this thread. Chief economist for Shell.
minerve 2
08/3/2019
11:07
Some people are so easily bought for a %.

getting and brexit are the male forms of Horizontal Heather.

minerve 2
08/3/2019
11:03
Good point Meanwhile. Ryelodge - what do you think on that excellent point from the astute Meanwhile?
gettingrichslow
08/3/2019
11:03
Sheepy

Why are you invested, if you are, in such a dreadful company?

Actually you are wrong. Asset strippers take no account of the actual business and staff. The assets could be land, intellectual property, etc. Hanson was an asset stripper.

Melrose build the businesses they acquire and sell them on as going concerns.

There is a big difference.

Of course, being so blinkered, as you are, you wouldn’t want to recognise the difference.

brexitplus
08/3/2019
10:52
David Roper at the Analyst's meeting yesterday.

"David Roper, another founder and an executive vice-chairman like Mr Miller, said that some people would describe their activities as asset stripping. “We’d like to call it improving businesses and selling them on,” he said."

Mr Roper is quite clear. He recognises the activity as being termed 'Asset stripping' but he calls it something else.

So we're all correct, on this board. They do asset stripping but some of us call it something else.

meanwhile
08/3/2019
10:31
That explains it then. So a company making thousands redundant is morally better than one taking on people.

If you say so.

brexitplus
08/3/2019
10:29
Well, yes and no. First, I am not waxing lyrical about Rolls-Royce performance like you are with Melrose. I also understand what the non-underlying items are and I believe they are more likely to be non-underlying than what Melrose believe their non-underlying items are. Second, I know what will drive the share price forward on Rolls-Royce and it is much more specific than improving efficiency. Third, Rolls-Royce holds 3.79% of my portfolio and I have 11 shares that hold more.

Time to grow-up Brexit.

minerve 2
08/3/2019
10:19
I see Rolls Royce reported a positive underlying profit (+£606m) and a very large reported loss (-£1161m).

Bit like Melrose really!!!

brexitplus
08/3/2019
10:14
Getting.

When I was at uni there was a student known as “Horizontal Heather” who is now sadly departed. She supplemented her grant with a stream of “paying clients.” I was not one of them, had plenty of GFs.

She would stand at the bar in the evenings almost touting for business.

Clever girl - I believe she got a First.

brexitplus
08/3/2019
10:11
Porky, but what about those poor people at Rolls Royce. Collateral damage I suppose YOU would call them.

To paraphrase you

“People will lose their jobs to please the market. Marriages may break down. Depression may come along. Who knows, even the odd suicide. A pathetic way to run a company IMO. Not something I would be proud of.”

brexitplus
08/3/2019
10:09
I will overlook that silly comment about my daughter brexit this time. :)

Maybe not next time. ;)

minerve 2
08/3/2019
10:06
Well, if people were blessed with intelligence they would understand the differences in business models and the nuances, whether implicit or explicit, in objectives. Buy maybe I should make this simple with an analogy.

A guy starts the year with the intent of taking his family on holiday. Due to commitments at work he can no longer go. He pockets the saving and buys himself a new set of golf clubs.

A guy starts the year with no intent in taking his family on holiday. He uses the excuse of work commitments to not go. He buys the new set of golf clubs from the catalogue he was reading over Christmas.

Get the idea?

Idiots.

minerve 2
08/3/2019
09:57
“Lounge lizards” - showing your age Ryewhile.

Which dress are you wearing today? Hope the material isn’t too itchy.

brexitplus
08/3/2019
09:51
'Lounge lizards' they used to be called, Minerve.

ryelodge has it correct. Whatever way you look at the £50 Million bonuses, (for example equal to the total final dividend on 5B shares,) they're just nonsense.

And that's what I, and many other shareholders, continue to question. What was the thought process that led to £50M bonuses being offered and then accepted and are these same processes applied elsewhere today ?

meanwhile
08/3/2019
09:46
Porky

What about the thousands of job going/gone at Rolls Royce, all in the cause of improving efficiency and pleasing the market?

brexitplus
Chat Pages: Latest  378  377  376  375  374  373  372  371  370  369  368  367  Older