Cic Capital Share Discussion Threads

[gtfc1] 26/7/2015 11:47

Gold price. Doesn't this just reflect demand? Therefore businesses go under when the price drops which can be a good opportunity or not dependant on who you are. Then the volumes drys up and the price incraeses. Unless we see a point where gold fundamentally overall will loose value and never come back due to an alternative won't it just go up and down?

[gtfc1] 26/7/2015 11:45

As per listing, the comment relates around the fact to start it listed when many even doubted this. Now before you ask me to find the quotes, it wasn't you that said that and how dare I.

The listing per say as an activity has been a success it happened. Based on where shareholders got the shares from this is also a success, ie no money individually parted hands to buy them.

Of course the original is not valued or listed so its either at this time helped to reduce the loss or increase the gain if the original lists.

When it comes to success , well no not particularly setting the world on fire. Like most higher risk, not known stocks as soon as no info is evident it drops and only changes when solid data put out. Listing a success? Depends on your expectation.

[papillon] 25/7/2015 14:20

"I think maybe the listing was somewhat of a turning point."

Well the listing has been a great success, so far, gtfc1. CICG listed at 6p and a month later the share price is 2.625p!! Be interesting to see what it will be in a further months time.

[gtfc1] 25/7/2015 07:21

Drying up?

I think it's been drying up considerably on here for months, I think maybe the listing was somewhat of a turning point.

I guess you are waiting the delisting to start writing again!

[the diddymen] 24/7/2015 15:48

CICG posting on the Asylum thread is drying up as the share price heads south. Luckily uber AM, Aymesco, has decreed that the executors of Share Shark's will, will not sell her share holding.

[papillon] 20/7/2015 21:08

Gold price now under US$1100 per oz.



Longer term gold charts. They do not include todays price action so do not show todays fall below US$1100. These charts indicate a bleak future for the gold price, at least in the short term.

[soul limbo] 20/7/2015 12:24

Shares in Jiasen International Holdings (JSI) are down another 22% to just 4.875p last seen this morning (down from an IPO price of 82p only a year ago) to leave this obviously squeaky clean outfit from Fraud Central (Fujian Province in China) valued at just £5.9 million, down from c. £100 million at IPO.

This is despite reporting cash and cash equivalents of RMB 315million (about £30 million) as at 31 Mar 2015 in its recent trading update. In other words, it is drowning in cash and now trades at a discount of about 80% to that cash! Given that it paid dividends totalling 3.85p in respect of calendar 2014, this puts the company on a dividend yield of 79%.

Today we learn that, just as with another questionable Chinese enterprise, JQW (as announced a couple of weeks ago), the CFO has quit.

I have a question for Jiasen’s advisers, Nomad Cairn Financial and Broker Beaufort Securities. Nobody else believes a word Jiasen has been telling the market. Leave aside your FCA and AIM Regulation tickboxes for a moment and think about the reputational damage your firms are accumulating.

Either Jiasen is clean, but you have failed to convince anyone of this (so who on earth it would hire you?) or it is an abject fraud and you continue to represent it. Either way, your firms take a hit, fellas.

How long will it be before Jiasen is suspended? And which of you two advisers will be left holding the baby?

[the diddymen] 18/7/2015 13:36

AM Aymesco1 on LSE: 'We must be fairly close now for news to come!'

Another glimpse of the blindingly specualtive that adds no further information to the debate. The AM is clearly unable to add any facts because as usual with an SB company, they only do hearsay.

[papillon] 17/7/2015 09:13

LOL, TD. Aymesco1 speculated to accumulate on MTV, TRP, etc, but failed to accumulate and ended up a big, big, loser!!

[the diddymen] 16/7/2015 21:45

Slowfast looks like another member has joined the subsidiary Asylum.

gemma4cash: 'Thanks Aymesco1.One has to speculate to accumulate,as the saying goes.'

[slowfast] 11/7/2015 07:19

It's your opinion as to whether it's an error of judgement.FACT!!As yet it's unproven.FACT!!CICG is listed.FACT!!You said pigs might fly.FACT!!They did fly.FACT!!
Your posts are repetitive and vacuous.FACT!! LOL.

[papillon] 10/7/2015 19:15

The last reported final results, ( for CICC states:

"The average number of salaried employees during the period was 9 (2012: 8). The Company uses the services of its executive directors, public officers, staff and consultants to perform their work." 9 does NOT equal 28000, leapfrog/sence2!!

[papillon] 10/7/2015 19:06

leapfrog
Posts: 92
Off Topic

Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 3.25
unvrkwToday 06:59Sometime ago the number of employees across the group that were indirectly employed or associated with CICC was in the region of 28.000.
As each shell lists the employee numbers will be negligible until the assets go in.
Where CICG is concerned I would expect the number of employees associated with CICG or indirectly employed would be less than 200 dependant upon CICG'S assets and output.Assuming it uses contract miners.
AtB

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

28000 employees!! LOL. How did CICR/CICC pay them over the years? With shirt buttons? How would CICG pay up to 200 employees? With shirt buttons? Pure fantasy from leapfrog/sence2.

[gtfc1] 10/7/2015 17:45

The share prophets article reads very much like on here. Comes across as a copy and paste from one of you guys, it's an accumulation of comments that are written by people on here over this last period and now published. Repeat, repeat, repeat. Only thing that's not repeated is that cic gold actually listed.

[papillon] 10/7/2015 13:24

"We the CIC holders don't really know how big the group is we have operations all over the place nearly 20000 employees directly & indirectly,"

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Well Aymesco1, the "group" (CICR/CICC) NEVER had "nearly 20000 employees" when it was listed in Canada and on AIM otherwise the published a/c's would have mentioned it!! CICG and CICF are cash shells so they haven't "nearly 20000 employees"!! So where are these employees, Aymesco1?

Either you're fantasising, Aymesco1, or you are very gullible and someone else is fantasising. Which is it?

[the diddymen] 09/7/2015 20:49

AM Aymesco:

'Don't think the chatting will stop specially if the company release asset news think we will be swapped with it. I feel tomorrow could be the last chance before news next week!!! Would you want to be out of this when asset news comes!!!'

Normal bollix that you would expect from an institutionalised asylum member.

[the diddymen] 09/7/2015 20:45

Polo77, how can a shell company that has not traded benefit? So who has benefitted from these activities? As ever just part of the surrealistic fog that surrounds anything CICC.