Cic Capital Share Discussion Threads

[papillon] 17/6/2015 15:22

unvrkw
Today 12:14
I understand the office is in place and some people have been invited. no idea where.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

"no idea where". Timbuktu? Tipperary (it's a long way to Tipperary!!)?

[soul limbo] 16/6/2015 16:33

and another desperate for cash (AUHUA) :

[soul limbo] 16/6/2015 16:32

another Chinese related outfit hits the wall (Sorbic) :

[goulding1215] 16/6/2015 10:29

So, TD, you refer quite disparingly to the LSE BB as the 'asylum'. Tell me then. If all these CIC shares come to fruition, as I am confident that they will, who will have been living in the asylum' for the past 18 months disparaging everything that SB has done and achieved? After all, it is only relisting that is left, the rest you have been proven as wrong. You and pappy the Pratt, PFF, have done nothing but sit on this BB, attempting to pull everything and everybody, especially SB to pieces, for the whole period, proving that you must all be in an institution for having so much free time. Erratum, you do spend time on the PET BB as lippe. Loopy Lippe, as I love to call you.

[philfromfrance] 15/6/2015 22:30

If you did get through, would it be a 'crabpot' talking to a 'crackpot' about a 'conplot'? lol

[crabpot] 15/6/2015 22:17

Pap,

Appreciate your reply, interesting... I tend to do the opposite, I prefer some dialog (especially microcap's). Don't tend to bother them to much, best info is often what they can't tell you imo.

[papillon] 15/6/2015 21:50

Of course not crabpot. I've NEVER had any contact with the CEO's, MD's or BoD's of any company I have held shares in (apart from when I was also an employee).

Firstly because I think it's a pointless exercise and secondly because I've only ever been a very small shareholder.

[the diddymen] 15/6/2015 20:42

crabpot, it is very difficult to distinguish between fact and fiction with this company. I would suggest that in the financial fog that exists, the last person you would want to ring for facts is the architect. Dr TD

[crabpot] 15/6/2015 19:57

Pap,

Out of interest have you had any contact with Stuart Bromley?

[gtfc1] 15/6/2015 19:45

Is the company to be listed then? Enough understanding as yet to see this a green light or I guess we want to see it on an exchange first.

[seahawktex] 15/6/2015 18:40

rrringg rrringg, rrrrriinnggg rrrringgg

"hello, you're through to the confirmation bias hotline, Mr Bromley speaking"

"hello, please can you tell me some things I want to here..?"

"certainly my son; you are a handsome man, a real hit with the ladies, and soon to be very rich"

"that's exactly what I thought, I'll be sure to ring again"

"anytime you need your attitude repolarised"

[goulding1215] 15/6/2015 16:59

Are you really a grown-up, real mature man PFF?

[philfromfrance] 15/6/2015 16:03

I keep getting bombarded with financial articles about the 'Grexit' (Greek exit from the Euro)!
Could it be the the UKLA have demanded a 'Stexit', as the price for considering any listings & that there has to be some limit on what may be considered the previous 'toxic' control & management of CICC & its subsidiaries?

[goulding1215] 15/6/2015 10:12

Ditto TD with your inane and meaningless posts.

[papillon] 14/6/2015 21:58

Aymesco1
Today 21:32
Sea

why don't you and your merry men you know who I mean actually do some research or think outside the box and make a phone call that way you won't have to come on here with your merry bandits and cast doubt over what will happen.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You really must be the most gullible investor of all time, Aymesco1. Your phone calls to the MTV & TRP CEO's, for example, don't appear to have done you any good whatsoever. When will the penny drop that CEO's are hardly likely to tell you, a piddling PI, anything apart from bullish bullsh*t?

[papillon] 14/6/2015 15:01

..........

[papillon] 14/6/2015 15:01

But CICG haven't any gold assets, GENISES; it's listing as a shell!! Hence at this moment in time their extraction costs are ZERO!! Lol. We don't know what gold assets they will hope to acquire so how can we presume the extraction costs will be below US$700?

A falling gold price will not be good for investor sentiment towards a wannabe gold company so I wouldn't be surprised if the listing of CICG is "pulled" (if it was going to be listing soon) due to lack of investor interest in the gold sector as a whole.

"I want to know what's happened to all the past news of where we have seen no update."

That question might also be exercising the minds of the UKLA, GENISES, as well as yours!! Where have all the past CICG gold assets disappeared to? What happened to them? Why is CICG just an "off the shelf" shell?

[genises] 14/6/2015 14:23

Depend pap on what price they can extract the gold.
As long as it's below $700 the company will make money.
Nobody knows what's going to merge into the company.
China looks good due to low cost labour.

I want to know what's happened to all the past news of where we have seen no update.

[genises] 14/6/2015 14:23

Depend pap on what price they can extract the gold.
As long as it's below $700 the company will make money.
Nobody knows what's going to merge into the company.
China looks good due to low cost labour.

I want to know what's happened to all the past news of where we have seen no update.

[papillon] 14/6/2015 14:17

GENISES. Regarding CICG, it's not the ideal time to list a gold "shell" since the gold charts are very bearish: