Cic Capital Share Discussion Threads

[papillon] 09/7/2015 18:29

Aymesco1
Posts: 2,691
Observation

Opinion: Strong Buy
Price: 3.25
Rise-sageToday 09:48I was given the invite while was in London last month and I couldn't make it unfortunately. What I do know is it's mega bucks.

We the CIC holders don't really know how big the group is we have operations all over the place nearly 20000 employees directly & indirectly, I've said it a few times that it's hrs to see how this all adds up and how Sence came up with the figures he has until you look at in depth there's some big plays coming!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

LOL. "We the CIC holders don't really know how big the group is we have operations all over the place nearly 20000 employees directly & indirectly". Where's your proof, Aymesco1? "nearly 20000 employees"? Pull the other leg, Aymesco1!!!!!!!!!!!

[papillon] 09/7/2015 10:50

Look at the share price performance of CICR/CICC when it was listed between 2005 and 2014. How did shareholders benefit, polo77? Explain that to TD!! LOL.

[polo77] 09/7/2015 10:17

The diddyman.

Go to www.cicgold.com - about us - significant shareholders

You will see the connection

[the diddymen] 07/7/2015 09:47

Cracking case studies, just not sure how CICC shareholders benefitted!

[the diddymen] 07/7/2015 09:41

Either no one can spell at 'CICC', or the same person writes everything.

[polo77] 07/7/2015 08:01

CICG Case studies are:

CASE STUDY 1: Boroo Gold, Mongolia
CASE STUDY 3: Libar Gansu, China Non Ferrous Bureau

Not sure if 3 should be 2 or 2 is missing !!

[gtfc1] 06/7/2015 05:32

Too connected for me, will be concious and wait.

[philfromfrance] 05/7/2015 21:28

I do not see any profit for 97.5% of his shareholders, just for 'him & a select few'!! After all, as we are informed he has those larger private Companies (employing 10,000 plus - hum, hum), would we not expect him to (as we have been told by him PR guru), pick the riper fruit for himself & leave the listed Company & the 97.5% with the hype?
On another point about the 97.5%, the great cult leader e mailed me the following:

"Keep mouthing off on the blogs with your personal comments. Shareshark, and a whole host of shareholders continue to conduct off market transactions, get a full warrant in the arrangements and do very very well. You prefer to mouth off. Really really stupid."

So he now agrees & is signing off as "really really stupid"!!!!!! lol

[gtfc1] 05/7/2015 21:22

Could say the same with many shares but also with this one

[the diddymen] 05/7/2015 17:16

gtfc, history says that he will not generate shareholder wealth. Things can change, but the cynic in me says that he cannot do it. That leaves investors the option to stay and buy/sell on opportunities that SB's style will inevitably generate; or to find safer pastures. The key thing is not to be holding the shares at the end.

[gtfc1] 05/7/2015 16:42

And what's the end game then? Build assets in try and create value and then sell the shares? I am not sure time wise how SB would be able to sustain the first list to get all complete and then in theory create the value in the cic capital business.

At this point I see no gain for SB. Granted in the past on shares issues and people buying direct there was a gain but to my knowledge he has never sold cic shares in these businesses and a dividend has been issued which can be sold and translated into money.

If the objective of SB is negative, gain without actual assets I am not sure how it will be achieved. As people write cic gold needs to stand or the rest will fall, how he can do this not sure if the inspectors are recognised authorities in their field.

[the diddymen] 05/7/2015 12:18

gtfc, something has been made from nothing! You cannot have the track record of SB (dissipation of shareholder wealth) and apply it to a Balance Sheet and put a multiple of four or five on the assets. At least not without very quickly demonstrating that the model has a real ability to generate distribtable wealth (cash dividends for a starter).

I am sure that CICG/SB will execute some share swaps shortly. These will dilute CICG shareholders but bring assets into the empty cupboard. No doubt every move will be hyped but as ever there will be no clarity as to what is an asset and what is not.

[gtfc1] 05/7/2015 07:25

The substance is called for, not there is final proof with 2014 cic capital results, published and agreed. The substance since is the list of cic gold, something has been created worth some value of course if you got free shares.

Granted the large cic capital shares are still hung up to dry and that needs to change. So far I don't see the millions that SB is being claimed to make from everyone, I see some making a few quid if they sell, nothing more, nothing less. Interesting times.

[the diddymen] 04/7/2015 20:20

Early days yet but the momentum is in the direction of the Balance Sheet and historical performance of the 'director'. I am sure that there will be a bit of froth from time to time, but with SB, no substance.

[papillon] 04/7/2015 18:54

SuzieP. Don't be a clot! They (the boy scouts saga, the Canadian newspaper article, the comments of an Australian judge, etc) are NOT rumours! They are facts. Whether you think they are significant, or not, depends on your perspective. If you showing a large paper loss on your CICC shares I presume you hope these facts will go away.

It's "evil" and "nasty" to spread false rumours, but if you are just repeating the facts already in the public domain then that is definitely NOT nasty or evil. I never knew it was immoral to repeat facts. Perhaps you would be happier living in North Korea? Anyone spreading facts there is liable to be exterminated!!

SuzieP. You are the sick person who lacks morals if you want to censor the truth and stop discussion of the facts.

[suziep] 04/7/2015 14:02

You are nasty evil people to have spread those rumours. You have no shame or morals. Who would ever believe one thing you say. No one. You show yourselves up for what you are, sick

[slowfast] 04/7/2015 14:00

If there's one totally pathetic example on these boards,you have to look no further than soul limbo.As for Dim runt (as I assume thats what Dr stands for)I again question your complete lack of moral integrity.Clearly another"fine"example of a bigot who can't tell the difference between right and wrong.LOL.

[the diddymen] 04/7/2015 12:45

Slowfast, there is probably as much evidence to link Soul Limbo with the 'demise post' as there is to substantiate just what has gone on in CICC since 01 February 2013. Nothing.

What was interesting was all the mugs who believed the untested, unproven post. Not surprising that CICG investors took it hook line and sinker, just like their investing activity.

Dr TD

[soul limbo] 04/7/2015 12:31

genises....if you really think those emails were from me, then i demand you to go to the cops and take action.... go on do something about them... instead of whining like some silly little school boy twit desperate to garner some pathetic sympathy.

[genises] 03/7/2015 21:58

Off course you didn't like the foul mouth emails you sent me due to me giving your location to SB
You are one truly evil low life and I hope you get all what is due to you.

[slowfast] 03/7/2015 16:56

Economical with the truth as ever.LOL.

[soul limbo] 03/7/2015 16:45

i dont have to explain anything.. as I didnt post that.