Cic Capital Share Discussion Threads

[the diddymen] 03/6/2015 16:45

Slowfast, how can the UKLA possibly allow CICG to list until CICC posts its accounts. Why should the UKLA risk their reputation by listing a company related to CICC; a Company that has manifest problems with Corporate Governance (Accounts, profit recognition, confusion over assets) inability to administer itself (opening bank accounts), unenforceable debts...it goes on and on.

At the moment the response is for SB to resign as a director of CICG, presumably because some advisor reckons that he is the problem, but maintain his highly influential shareholding.

I see that there are warm words from Dr Cowley on the asylum thread about listing CICG, but no specific date. What else can he say. It strikes me that the strategy at the moment is to cross fingers and hope that someone relents at the UKLA. Will then SB resign to enable the listings of the CICC/S companies.

The graph at the top shows you that this is a mess, and in my opinion even if they negotiate the UKLA rock, trading and making a profit is the next problem.
You are backing one man in this company and to date he has made an absolute hash of it (as far as shareholders are concerned).

[slowfast] 03/6/2015 16:41

Ha ha,I'm sure you could effortlessly pick a fight with yourself and then tell yourself that you're filtered.LOL
Ask yourself what sort of a person threatens other posters on an anonymous BB?
You really couldn't make it up,it's beyond contempt,together with the other low lives who fester on this board.LOL.

[papillon] 03/6/2015 15:32

slowfast? Makes accusations without being in possession of the facts.

I don't know whether CICG will list anytime soon. I'm not privy to what is going on behind the scenes. It's possible, but CICG was first mooted for flotation (in summer 2012) in spring of that year so I would take anything said by the company on listing with a pinch of salt. I'll believe it when I see it happening.

[slowfast] 03/6/2015 14:41

We will I suspect soon find out who are the complete fools and whether or not,the gobbier protagonists on this board will be known as the cast for the house of fools?LOL.
PS Paps there can't be many posters on this board left who you haven't filtered???
LOL.

[papillon] 03/6/2015 14:28

I have slowfast on filter, phil. The man is a complete fool. He accused me of being Soul Limbo in the past. Jumps to the wrong conclusions.

[philfromfrance] 03/6/2015 13:52

What about Stewie's 'informal' PR machine, who queried genuine e mails from the 'Stupendous one' & on others, queried facts which were never even revealed?
Seems to me that the 'disinformation' has its 'sauce' (lol) in Beijing & 'Miss Marple land'?!!! lol

[slowfast] 03/6/2015 12:34

Answer:- SL

[papillon] 03/6/2015 12:13

bottomsup
Tue 23:29
Although cicc is a delisted company it's a shame they have still not reported their results for 2014.
But I am in know hurry as I have waited a year and can wait several more months.
Once the first one has listed they will have all the required correct info to list the next three.
I wonder wether false information has been given by a previous broker which has delayed the proceedings hence why they are taking them to court.

I see the musketeers are still at it on adfvn.
One for all ,all for one comes to mind.
It will be interesting to see wether action is taken specially the one who sends false company emails out to shareholders but accidentally leaves his IP address for all to see who knows how to access the info.
Must be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

At the risk of being thought pedantic, it's whether, not wether, GENISES/bottomsup. Additionally it's "I am in no hurry", not "I am in know hurry".

You state, GENISES, "I wonder wether false information has been given by a previous broker which has delayed the proceedings hence why they are taking them to court."

You could easily have stated, "I wonder whether TRUE information has been given to AIM by a previous broker which has delayed the proceedings?" We don't know what the Nomad is supposed to have told the AIM authorities concerning CICC so how can you know whether it was true, or false? We await the result of the legal action with interest.

I've asked you before and I'll ask you again; who sent false company e-mails?

[philfromfrance] 02/6/2015 22:31

Pappy - Blatter is trying to stay until a new President is appointed but Stewie appears so toxic that he may have to go if anything is to list in the UK?

[papillon] 02/6/2015 22:28

leapfrog
Today 19:14
Yes I saw exactly the same CICC up 114% (7.5p)whats that all about unless it the May Ist anniversary of suspension RNS last part is copied here;-The Company has built its balance sheet to progress the Company's business plans and has, since 2004, been announcing quarterly financial statements to the market. The Company is pleased to announce that it has appointed VSA Capital Limited as Financial Advisor and Gowlings (UK) LLP as Legal Advisor to progress a possible main board listing and to prepare a prospectus. The Board believes that a move to a standard listing would be in the interest of all shareholders. Accordingly, the Company shares will delisted from AIM. The Company remains a Canadian public company (public issuer).

Commenting on the Board decision, Stuart J. Bromley, Executive Chairman stated "The Company's balance sheet has grown significantly in the past two years since admission to the AIM Market in November 2011. We have exciting plans for our portfolio of businesses and we are working with advisers to make progress with individual company listings. We believe that a move to the Main Market for CICC should promote a greater correlation between the Company's financial performance and its share price and also improve market liquidity.

Apart from the anniversary I cannot think of any other reason unless something is about to happen and LSE have jumped the gun.Perhaps a sign of things to come?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

To a layman like me, TD, it doesn't look like SB has a leg to stand on in his legal action against Rawlinson. Has he forgotten he wrote that?

PS. The lse site has gone haywire today and in the process given lots of rather gullible PI's excitement, or despair, dependant on whether their "dead" shares are shown as up, or down!! Lol.

[papillon] 02/6/2015 22:10

Good observation, TD.

[the diddymen] 02/6/2015 19:45

Typical bollix that we come to associate with CICC:

'The Board believes that a move to a standard listing would be in the interest of all shareholders. Accordingly, the Company shares will delisted from AIM.'

A starting point for Mr Rawlinson's defence.

[papillon] 02/6/2015 17:59

Well SB is going!!!!!!!!!!! He's stepping down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sepp Blatter is going!!!! Lol.

[the diddymen] 02/6/2015 14:17

Joe/Goulding, I think that you are suffering from a split personality. Dr TD

[homeboy35] 02/6/2015 13:46

When are they going to re-list?

[papillon] 02/6/2015 10:42

"Don't invest what you can't afford to loose!"

Very true, gtfc1.

PS. At the risk of being thought pedantic, it's lose not loose.

[goulding1215] 02/6/2015 10:41

Hey, you guys missed this brilliant post from Jo Yangtze on the LSE thread. Perhaps too logical for twisted minds and personalities:-

1.It has been said on here before, several times, that the company cannot make any public comment or update, upon a listing progress with UKLA. Otherwise it provokes ire from within the UKLA. The first we will hear should be a listing date.

2. Nomads are not above the law. If the company considers that a Nomad failed in his fiduciary duty costing the company money, then the company has every right to sue, to recover that money. The decision to sue will not have been taken lightly nor without carefully considering counsel's opinion, and acting upon that.

3. As the company is registered in Canada, that is the appropriate country within which to sue. In my opinion, theywill get a fairer hearing in Canada than London.

Question:- why is it that everyone that comes on here of a sane and sensible mind say the same thing 'you guys need to get a life'. Referring specifically to TD,papillon, PPFF, SL

[gtfc1] 02/6/2015 09:20

Well like all of these shares it won't be the first to disappoint if and when it does.

I think all these shares are a lottery, huge risk of course which means great potential or full loss.

Don't invest what you can't afford to loose!

[the diddymen] 01/6/2015 22:35

gtfc1, you could say that being bothered might impair your realism. This is where we are trying to help out. Dr TD

[papillon] 01/6/2015 22:19

"they have a reason to at least be bothered". They sure do, gtfc1. Some invested a lot of their money in buying CICC shares. Currently they have lost the lot!! Whether they will get some of it back is open to question. If I had invested my money in CICC shares I would be more than "bothered"!! I would be very angry, but not with message board critics! I would be angry with myself for being so gullible and angry with the company.

We, on this bb, warned CICC shareholders of the dangers before it was suspended last year. We have been proved correct.

[gtfc1] 01/6/2015 20:51

Guys if that's the asylum board no idea what you see yourselves as being.

There are always pros, cons, realists, unrealists, etc etc. you guys really need to get a life, they have a reason to at least be bothered.

[the diddymen] 01/6/2015 20:20

unvrkw (fully paid up asylum member):

I think cic may use ipo capital to help the, raise funds to list which they will then fund to help other businesses list?

Dr TD replies: 'There there unvrkw, I would tend to agree. Any company that has lost all its shareholder funds (subject to a set of accounts to prove it) is going to need to raise more cash. The only small assumption you make is that they have the ability to list a company (other than in a winding up procedings).'