Cic Capital Share Discussion Threads

[the diddymen] 01/6/2015 20:12

Share Shark on the asylum board (the line between leadership and membership is greying):

Thanls yorks shares. Yes he is new as is this gent. iNteresring history.

Also Mr. Frank Lewis.very interesting.


...a set of accounts, disclosure of what happened on AIM ejection, a report of profitable work, an account of the assets owned by 'CICC', a listing date for CICG, a statement on where this Mayfair lease is... now that would be interesting. That said Share Shark, if Frank Lewis interests you...great. Dr TD

[share_shark] 01/6/2015 19:12

Mr Frank Lewis/ very interesting CV

[share_shark] 01/6/2015 18:54

Also Mr. Frank Lewis.very interesting.






The Board





Mr. Frank Lewis, Age 69

Independent Non-Executive Chairman Go to the Web Page

Mr. Frank Lewis has over 25 years of listed and private company boardroom experience, having served as a Non-Executive Chairman and Non-Executive Director for a number of international publicly-quoted companies with interests across Europe, the Far-East, Middle East and Africa with a particular focus on distribution, manufacturing, technology and natural resources.

Mr. Lewis is currently Non-Executive Chairman of AIM listed Active Energy Group Plc. an international supplier of industrial wood chip and timber and Biomass for energy fuel products and, an Non-Executive Directors of Asia Ceramics Holdings Plc., a China based exporter and distributer of ceramic products and a Non-Executive Director of China Africa Resources Plc., a AIM Listed Zinc mining development and exploration company focussed on Namibia.

Mr. Lewis also sits on the Board as Chairman and Non-Executive Director of private companies including Community Solar UK Limited and Durham Infrastructure 5 Limited.

Mr. Lewis qualified as a Chartered Accountant in South Africa in 1973 and became a FCA in the UK in 1995. Mr. Lewis is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and serves as a committee member for its special interest group for Non Executive Directors. Mr. Lewis is also a Former member of the AIM Advisory Council, which advises the London Stock Exchange on all matters relating to the AIM market.

[share_shark] 01/6/2015 18:49

New addition to the Bod CIC Capital ?.
Courtesy of poster on LSE.

yorks_shares
Today 13:41
Hi all

Away from listing issues, do cic capital have a new non exec director.

Website updated 26 may and I'm sure Phillip Porter is new or is it just me?? :-)

[the diddymen] 01/6/2015 17:05

No accounts, no statement, no definitive knowledge of assets, no declaration of the 'Mayfair lease', no listing, no declared profits; but shareholders do have a civil action in Canada. Nice one SB, big man.

[the diddymen] 01/6/2015 17:02

Paps, yes how many times have we seen Joe take that approach over the years on various BBs. Dissent will not be tolerated in the asylum. Dr TD

[papillon] 01/6/2015 16:58

And another turns up, TD! Lol.


JoeYangtze
Today 16:38
342W. Most, if not all of your post is irrelevant, purely opinion and hot air.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

But, Joe, last year you posted many times that CICC had NOT been booted off AIM; instead it was a company decision to de-list. It now transpires, following SB's legal action against the Nomad, that "most, if not all", of what you post is "irrelevant, purely opinion and hot air"!!!!!!!!!! LOL.

[the diddymen] 01/6/2015 16:46

Paps' no sooner said than :..........

Havegun 'Come on guys,it's always darkest before the dawn.'

............an asylum member turns up.

[papillon] 01/6/2015 16:33

Soul Limbo
5 May'14 - 19:29 - 3163 of 8225 0 0


joey aka mixi aka yaris has to be, by far the biggest gobsites going.

Of course CICC were forced to delist. They just can't cancel the listing at whim.... to delist voluntarily they need to hold an egm have a resolution voted upon.

Under AIM Rules, it is a requirement that any cancellation of the listing must be approved by not less than 75% of votes cast by shareholders voting in a general meeting.

ref : page 43 AIM RULE 41


Can the moron mixi direct us to the EGM where CICC voted on this and got the required 75% or more votes to cancel the listing ?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This 13 month old post by Soul Limbo was factually correct at the time of posting though the deluded fantasists and bullish morons on the lse bb wouldn't accept it's truth. Now SB has provided further proof of it's truth by taking legal action against the NOMAD!!

[papillon] 01/6/2015 16:06

342W
Today 15:07
shareminder,

it's a given that bad news is never forthcoming - i'm sure you've experienced that with smallcap stocks on the LSE. Good news is always rushed to press for the world to know.

With no official update for goodness knows how long - and multiple unofficial deadlines come and gone - it should tell you something about what sort of 'news' is not being transmitted to shareholders. IMO that court case is just a desperate diversion. We were told (by bulls on here as well) CICC chose not to come back to AIM. Now we find out that they were actually booted off for which SB is upset about because he thinks NOMAD provided incorrect info to the regulator. One has to question why shareholders were never told about this at the time, and still haven't been told about it.

Expect the worse, as that is what is going down here imo.

shareminder
Today 15:19
I know and it's all very depressing...

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Two sensible posters on the lse!!

[papillon] 01/6/2015 16:05

Good point, SL.

[soul limbo] 01/6/2015 15:52

The thing is, do the Vancouver civil action virdicts have any jurisdiction over UK companies ?

Remember the civil action taken by QPP over a US outfit... QPP won but couldn't be enforced because the other party was in the US.

[papillon] 01/6/2015 15:49

The defendant will have a lot of travelling to do, TD, if the hearing is to be held in Vancouver and if he is based in London.

[the diddymen] 01/6/2015 15:22

SL, just saw that myself. The Company is registered in Canada, but you would have thought that the UK would have been the more natural place to hear the action. This might well slow down the action - which might be the aim.

342W and Shareminder should perhaps leave the asylum and have more effective discussion over here! Dr TD

[soul limbo] 01/6/2015 14:27

Interesting post on the LSE. The poster makes a valid comment. Why is SB taking civil proceedings in Vancouver ? CICC was an AIM company listed here in the UK and under UK regulation. It had no listing in Canada at all.

[the diddymen] 01/6/2015 14:20

I wonder which will come first a set of accounts for the year ended 31/01/14, or an action against a BB poster. I know which one I would prefer as a shareholder, and I think I know the one you are more likely to get.

[papillon] 01/6/2015 12:22

GENISES. You keep going on about that "false company emails". Were they sent to you and who by? Name who sent them, please.

[philfromfrance] 01/6/2015 09:04

Could it be that Stewie has decided to start throwing his considerable 'wait' around?!!!!!! lol

[genises] 01/6/2015 08:34

Sending false company emails to shareholders will no doubt be on SB list.

[papillon] 01/6/2015 00:09

Despite all the bravado exhibited by some shareholders on the lse bb, they must be sh*tting themselves with worry if they have invested a large sum of money in the company.

For the sake of decent coves like crabpot I hope the listings take place, but I'll only believe it when I see it. The same applies with MTA and WRN.

On the 24th April s_s said an update would soon be issued by the company. That's over a month ago and still no update has appeared.

[papillon] 31/5/2015 23:55

Matra (MTA) was de-listed from AIM on the same day as CICC, 1/5/14. Despite promises of re-listing in North America it's still not done so. WRN is suspended, but how long before that to is forced to de-list from AIM?

Shares rarely come back and re-list once de-listed from AIM, IMO. There are no doubt some exceptions, but it's rare, IMO.

[philfromfrance] 31/5/2015 22:37

pappy - you got that right m8 & Stupendous has been the biggest destroyer of shareholder value & the 'detractors' have just been warning others of what, in most cases, is already in the public domain:
Lost court cases, prison, lies, exaggerations, lost shareholder funds & value - what a 'looser' (loser) he has turned out to be!!
I am sure that there are a few here who would like his record of failure to be noticed on a more national or international scale (rather than a few hundred on a blog site)& that is exactly what he would get if he ever managed to get a legal action started!!
He has been threatening that for 18 months & it is a bit like his promise of a new listing - he huffed & he puffed & he blew it again!!!!!!!!!!!!lol

[papillon] 31/5/2015 18:27

s_s. I wonder if some shareholders will take any action against the likes of sence2 and leapfrog, if their ludicrous target sp's of £27+ prove to be just so much pie in the sky?

The company needs to update shareholders and provide definite listing dates. Shareholders need to wise up. Currently their investment in the company is worth a big fat ZERO. That will only change when the promised listings start taking place.

[papillon] 31/5/2015 18:08

share_shark
Today 17:17
Well it is very pleasing to see that SB is finally, able to commence legal proceedings against those, whom he thinks has damaged the company and shareholder's interests.

Update would be most welcome, on any area of the business.

If SB won on his legal case, it would be most interesting what actions(if any) any shareholders would take against those who may be guilty of damage to shareholder interests.

Still that is a long way off, as knowing SB, well in that area, he could well drag those involved, through the courts for many years.

INMHO and DYOR.

share_shark
Today 17:19
yorks _shares.

Many thanks for your contribution.

Have copied it over on ADVFN

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

We already know about the legal proceedings!!

"If SB won on his legal case, it would be most interesting what actions(if any) any shareholders would take against those who may be guilty of damage to shareholder interests."

But, s_s, surely the greatest damage to "shareholder interests" is the fact that after more than 12 months every shareholders investment is currently worth ZERO since there have been NO listings on the LSE as anticipated. Surely your question should be will "any shareholders" take any "actions" against SB if listings don't take place as promised? SB could easily silence the bb critics if the listings take place as promised.