Cic Capital Share Discussion Threads

[popples] 08/5/2015 13:36

Papillon: Discourteous troll sums you up.

[papillon] 08/5/2015 13:12

popples. You are believing the promises from WRN and CICC which over the years have, with both company's, turned out to be pure hype and just so much bullsh*t!!

Nothing, or almost nothing, that WRN & CICC have promised over the years has ever materialised. Yet still gullible, greedy, mugs, like you, are ready to forget past promises that never come to fruition and, like lapdogs being offered a bone, are ready to accept the latest promises and bullsh*t as though they will make them rich!! Lol. People like you never learn.

[papillon] 08/5/2015 10:11

popples. You're mad if you think I'm jealous of you or any other WRN holder. It's all hype and no substance. Smoke and mirrors, matey. Wake up and smell the coffee. You're going to lose most, if not all, your money you have invested in WRN.

I don't count my chickens until they have hatched whereas you are just a dreamer.

[the diddymen] 08/5/2015 09:43

Sage on LSE

'unvrk..originally the cicc was going to list at the same time,do you think the process of listing cic fund has started? I certainly hope so!'

Sage the original CICC was going to relist June-July 2014. When ten dinners realised that he had played a bit fast and loose for the listings authority, CICG was put forward with CICS for December 14. Now it looks as if CICG might list shortly, although the disappearance of Share Shark could suggest otherwise. As for CICS that appears to be off radar at the moment and you will have to ring the fat knacker himself. Number on every RNS! I hope that helps!

[popples] 07/5/2015 22:41

Pappilon. Who cares what country they relist in. It doesn't change the low number of shares and those who hold them. A tinge of jealousy in your comments?

[papillon] 07/5/2015 19:40

WRN will never re-list, popples. Not in this country anyway.

[popples] 07/5/2015 16:46

Papillon when WRN re - list there is going to be 1 large mug on your sideboard

[the diddymen] 07/5/2015 14:32

Sparty/Sage, when do you reckon that CICG is going to list? That should be the easy one. Wasn't 10 dinners suggesting by 31/12/14?

There is also the small matter of the y/e 31/01/14 accounts.

[papillon] 07/5/2015 13:39

Barksy1
Today 09:22

Premium Chat Member
Hi Sage, I wouldn't let those idiots know where it is until the last possible moment either after all the trouble they have caused.
Are there really only 400 of us in this, that's amazing and quite cosy! A certain amount of calm seems to be presiding over the board at the moment...is it the calm before the storm!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Lol. Are there really only 400 MUGS? Lol.

[papillon] 07/5/2015 13:02

Unfortunately for you I don't believe WRN will re-list, popples. So you think WRN will re-list with a possible Mkt Cap of over £100m, based on the current shares in issue? Lol. You're yet another who believes there is a crock of gold at the end of the rainbow. WRN is all hype and no substance. I wouldn't trust the WRN CEO, or his cronies, as far as I could throw them! I definitely wouldn't trust them with my money. Anybody who bought WRN shares and didn't manage to offload them prior to their latest suspension is a MUG in my book; a mug who will, unfortunately in your case, lose all the money he invested in WRN shares.

[popples] 07/5/2015 12:41

I am in WRN as well but don't have the ludicrous views that some take. I believe it will re-list and possibly at up to £5, but I am not holding my breath. If the dreamers view of £50 came true I would just retire!!

[papillon] 07/5/2015 12:17

popples. No doubt the Canadian investors who bought CICR shares hoped that the Great Leader would make them multi-millionaires. Some lost over 90% of their money if they still held them when CICR de-listed from the Canadian exchange.

He didn't make those Canadian investors multi-millionaires; whether he made himself a multi-millionaire during the time CICR was listed in Canada I don't know. His lifestyle would suggest he did.

You have similar greedy, gullible, dreamers to the likes of Aymesco1 posting on the WRN bb's.

[popples] 07/5/2015 10:41

All companies have skeletons in the cupboard, but the Boy Scout one should be addressed retrospectively with interest and apology from SB. After that I don't care what SB's CV looks like as long as he delivers and doesn't put us in Admin.

[sparty1] 07/5/2015 10:15

popples..I heard he got all his badges..platinum woggles all round..

[philfromfrance] 07/5/2015 08:22

Poppy - As we cannot find out how Stewie made his millions (certainly not from CICC), we have to expect it came from hard 'graft', which would perhaps explain your last few words?!!!!!!!!!!!!

[popples] 07/5/2015 07:48

To Papillon & friends:-
Re: Why is he so keen to go to so much trouble to make them all multi-millionaires? Why would he do that?
I guess because in the process of making holders millionaires he will make himself a multi-millionaire.
I for one would put into a collective fund to pay back the Boy Scouts if SB hasn't got the decency to do so.

[papillon] 06/5/2015 22:34

sage and rest of the bunch of little sh*ts are always querying the motives of myself, phil, SL and TD in continuing to post on this bb when only phil is a shareholder. Fair enough. Yet sage and his cohorts on the lse bb never query the motives of the Great Leader. Why is he so keen to go to so much trouble to make them all multi-millionaires? Why would he do that? Have they lost the use of their critical faculties because their greed?

[sparty1] 06/5/2015 15:28

pap......blimey ...sorry ,I didn't realise your were so ill..My investment in cicc is only cash ..it can be earned again,your mental health however.. Well,it`s very sad.Good luck with your hate campaign..Still haven't answered the question..SB has the cash ,had it for a year ..why go through all this legal /listing /palaver? No need to ,he can just walk away..?

[papillon] 06/5/2015 14:06

sage
Tue 23:06
munch1.. really?forgive me if I smell a rat..We are rather prone to subtle and not so subtle troll attacks here... :) even diddy one`s posted from france with soul..

Aymesco1
Today 13:19
We have some avatars back check there posting history that's the first sign

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

They are suspicious of the 3 posters who say they haven't received the shares they are entitled to, but swallow hook, line and sinker anything they are told by the Great Leader!! Lol. sage and Aymesco1 are greedy, gullible, little sh*ts who deserve to come a cropper.

PS. Don't worry munch, Vibhav and rnorth, you are probably not losing much!!

[papillon] 06/5/2015 13:59

I omitted goulding, yaris verso, Joe Yantze and slowfast from my bunch of unbelievably greedy, gullible, dictatorial bigots. I apologise for any distress caused to them by my omission! Lol.

[papillon] 06/5/2015 13:25

sage
Today 13:50
aymes ..blimey ,where did they come from?..lol.. Re the advfn bunch..Still hard to believe so many spend so much time dissing a company ,and SB for years of company non performance when they know full well getting to the listing stage has been years in the making.The company is not listed ,it cannot be sold or bought,so you cannot "warn people off" because the shares are not available..you cant persuade people to sell either..utterly pointless exercise and newbies should take note.They have an agenda ,either personal or financial but it has no effect on any long term holders...at all!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Lol. My agenda? It's very simple, oh wise one. I'll be laughing my head off if this all ended up with a bunch of unbelievably GREEDY, GULLIBLE, DICTATORIAL BIGOTS losing their shirts on this one!! The bunch of greedy, gullible, dictatorial bigots includes, sage, Aymesco1, leapfrog (sence2), Miss Marple, BillB and a few others. Such a fate would be priceless!

[the diddymen] 06/5/2015 10:20

Yaris remind me what 'appears' means. Set aside that, where is Share Shark - it generally means a known 'time out' when she disappears. Her use of 'we' when referring to CICC/CICS the other week suggests that she is far more than just another poster.

Why is ten dinners SB not posting his rants these days?

[goulding1215] 06/5/2015 09:48

Oh, so CICS is not going to list then TD? Where did you get that info from? Or is it your infertile imagination playing tricks again? Or just plain lies?

[the diddymen] 06/5/2015 09:42

Share Shark gone missing - is the CICG list hitting the rocks that appear to have fatally holed CICS?