Bisichi Share Chat (BISI)

Share Name	Share Symbol	Market	Type	Share ISIN	Share Description
Bisichi Mining	LSE:BISI	London	Ordinary Share	GB0001012045	ORD 10P

	Price Change	% Change	Share Price	Bid Price	Offer Price	High Price	Low Price	Open Price	Shares Traded	Last Trade
	+0.00p	+0.00%	70.50p	68.00p	73.00p	70.50p	70.50p	70.50p	0	06:34:02

Industry Sector	Turnover (m)	Profit (m)	EPS - Basic	PE Ratio	Market Cap (m)
Mining	25.7	-0.1	-2.4	-	7.40

Bisichi Share Discussion Threads

Showing 651 to 672 of 675 messages

Chat Pages: 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 Older

Date	Subject	Author	Discuss
08/1/2017 16:46	LOL - I suspect its already happened. Almost time to get out of this dog once commodity prices have a mini-top.	topvest	Read Full Thread Reply
08/1/2017 16:41	with the drop in sterling mr h needs a big payrise this year to make ends meet.	bisiboy	Read Full Thread Reply
29/10/2016 10:42	any chance of a dividend increase rather than a bonus increase for mr h?	bisiboy	Read Full Thread Reply
25/10/2016 10:31	https://www.ft.com/content/a71cc96c-dcba-3e53-8a87-caf8be075ae6	callumross	Read Full Thread Reply
25/10/2016 10:28	Looks like the market may be waking up to recent coal price - exchange rate developments!	callumross	Read Full Thread Reply
25/10/2016 09:52	Almost no stock available to trade at this level. Would expect the NAV to be comfortably exceeded before it becomes a little more liquid.	my retirement fund	Read Full Thread Reply
25/10/2016 09:43	Indeed they are - perhaps they will be subjected at some stage in the future to Mrs May and her cohorts reterict of corporate governance reforms.But yes this is clearly a golden time for their coal mining businesses and the currencies all mean that they have never had it so good. What's more it looks more like a permanent development.	my retirement fund	Read Full Thread Reply
25/10/2016 09:35	Not just that - BISI must be coining it in with the favourable exchange rate movements in the £ / $ / rand rate. Plus £1.20 per share in UK property assets and £1.50 NAV overall. Board still taking too much out of this company, though!	callumross	Read Full Thread Reply
25/10/2016 09:25	I take it everyone knows about the doubling of price of high grade coal and shortage of coking coal and the cut backs in Chinese production in the last few weeks ?	my retirement fund	Read Full Thread Reply
27/8/2016 13:57	They do seem well remunerated! Anyway, £15.9m net assets, up from £15.6m at the year end equates to £1.48 per share and property assets alone are £1.20 per share.	callumross	Read Full Thread Reply
27/8/2016 10:09	PROFITS WOULD BE TREBLE THOSE REPORTED IF HELLER DIDN'T TAKE £1M YEAR FROM THE COMPANY. GF	ntv	Read Full Thread Reply
19/8/2016 20:18	Ticking up nicely. One of the beneficiaries from Brexit I guess through the exchange rate gains for the colliery as result of cable depreciation.	callumross	Read Full Thread Reply
15/5/2016 19:16	me too see Mr H has managed to payback 15k of the loan.	bisiboy	Read Full Thread Reply
30/4/2016 13:28	Yes, £1,576k of directors' emoluments versus £427k annual dividend says it all. Average salary cost for the workers is £24k even including the director excesses. I will vote against most of the resolutions, not that it will make any difference.	topvest	Read Full Thread Reply
23/2/2016 16:03	Desperately needs some corporate action. A white knight to boot out the exceptionally greedy BoD, and either spin off, or sell off, the UK property portfolio (by itself worth around 100p per share).	bozzy_s	Read Full Thread Reply
23/2/2016 15:57	These would be trading at 300p+ if it weren't for the ridiculous directors salaries. If they earned a more reasonable £500,000 per year between them (still a little high perhaps), the dividend could be increased to around 11p per share. 2014 earnings would have been approx 20p per share. A share price of 300p would represent a P/E of 15, a yield of nearly 4%, and be underpinned by net tangible assets of 150p per share. They've obviously done the maths and decided that paying themselves a fortune makes them better off than paying themselves a fair amount and seeing the subsequent increase in the value of their shares. Haven't looked into their individual shareholdings, but I'd have thought if they own say 50% of the company, then surely they'd be better off earning a reasonable/fair amount and seeing the value of their shares increase by £10m - £15m?	bozzy_s	Read Full Thread Reply
14/5/2015 20:42	a certain director creamed off nearly a £1m. that is 10% of the mkt cap. that means one director of BP could take £14bn. that is 10% as well!! wholly unacceptable and just pure greed in my opinion. but wtfdik	ntv	Read Full Thread Reply
09/5/2015 15:07	£1.495m of directors' remuneration versus £1.160m last year. The dividend costs £0.43m and has been maintained ---- say's it all really!	topvest	Read Full Thread Reply
01/5/2015 18:22	clearly not in fact quite the reverse. still i am sure shareholders are quite happy for all the extra profits to be spent on pay rises rather than dividend increases!	bisiboy	Read Full Thread Reply
23/4/2014 20:34	£614k for the MD and £425k to shareholders in dividends says it all. Surely £614k in South Africa = a ludicrous salary and very high living standard. Not sure how he gets away with it given the employees are on such a low salary. More and more money for poor financial performance. This company could have distributed twice as much to shareholders over the last five years if we didn't have such a self serving bunch in charge.	topvest	Read Full Thread Reply
23/4/2014 20:29	Yes, very excessive - continues the trend of the family taking too much or a son with very expensive living habits!	topvest	Read Full Thread Reply
23/4/2014 13:06	Heller got a 32% pay increase LOL, there really is not point to the company is there unless your a Heller or connected party	envirovision	Read Full Thread Reply

Chat Pages: 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 Older