We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rhythmone | LSE:RTHM | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYW0RC64 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 169.50 | 168.00 | 171.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
21/2/2017 21:18 | Evening hotpants! We know you're here....watching like a hawk! Dearly me...what a sorry existence? Lol! Just a thought of course? | geheimnis2 | |
21/2/2017 20:52 | 1gw certainly is a bore! Just a thought? | geheimnis2 | |
21/2/2017 20:49 | How so jwoolley? If someone who presents himself as telling the truth against a so-called gang of rampers is caught out telling blatant fibs and then refuses to acknowledge it, isn't it reasonable to hold him to account? And stt, I'm unsure how to take some of your postings. At first I thought it was just bluster - you thought if you kept ignoring the point you might get away with it. But now I'm starting to think that you are actually incapable of seeing the point - of seeing the distinction between the existence of multiple ids and the specific claim about them that you made. And apologies to amt and anyone else getting bored with this issue. | 1gw | |
21/2/2017 19:56 | I'd always assumed the 1gw ID was operated by the same buffoon who operates the STT and fluffy IDs? | geheimnis2 | |
21/2/2017 19:51 | You are so naive 1gw. | jwoolley | |
21/2/2017 19:50 | STT You have been busted. Snake in the grass and a liar. | geheimnis2 | |
21/2/2017 18:58 | 1gw, you spend all afternoon for what.. you haven't proven anything... one minute it's 'credible' evidence, which it turned out not to be, next minute it's 'conclusive' proof, next it'll be a glitch...lol the fact is ONE of your post appears in top post, the other doesn't and that's 'conclusive' for you... yes, really!!!! the point is multiple ids DO exist, a point regular posters have repeatedly denied...now you're saying regular posters accept multiple ids exist...really??? is that you speaking on their behalf??? ...you can't have it both ways.... why not ask the 9 multi ids to reveal themselves.. see if you get 9 names... apart from that I've wasted enough of my time... | sikhthetech | |
21/2/2017 17:55 | I can't believe I have to spell this out any more clearly. The point, STT, is that that post is in the "top posts" lists. I doubt any of the regular posters on this board is in any doubt that multi ids exist, that wasn't the issue. The issue was that you used failure of a "popular" post to appear in the "top posts" list to rubbish the post, suggesting that it somehow proved that multi ids must have been voting it up and that advfn excluded such votes. Are you prepared to withdraw that claim now, faced with both the opinion of the advfn helpdesk and our recent experiment? Or is the earth still flat? | 1gw | |
21/2/2017 17:40 | amt, possibly... there was also a comment from him recently regarding the duopoly and selling attention... | sikhthetech | |
21/2/2017 17:37 | Sungri was on radio 4 this morning being interviewed as an investment manager. Apparently with the pound so low there are concerns that many British companies are sitting ducks for takeover. Only Brexit holding preditors at bay. I wonder if thats why he is still involved with Blinx ti liase with investors. | amt | |
21/2/2017 17:35 | let's get this right... you ask for posters with multi ids to post your post up... 9 multi ids vote your post up... it PROVES MULTI IDS EXIST, DOESN'T IT!!!! - at least 9 of them... lol 1gw21 Feb '17 - 16:21 - 827 of 832 9 0 Nice one precinct. So do you know if the brother of Tarquin (I guess) has access to enough ids to get a post into the "top posts" list and prove this once and for all? Or could someone else help precinct out - Kendo? How about we agree to restrict voting (up) on this post to those happy to vote with their multi-ids and see if it can get there? | sikhthetech | |
21/2/2017 17:23 | Well I think that's fairly conclusive. I wonder if stt is ready to concede defeat on this one? | 1gw | |
21/2/2017 17:11 | Smashy & Nicey would be proud of you, 1gw: less than an hour since you posted and you're already up to no. 3 in the charts. Tarquin's brother must be a very resourceful and connected chappy. Your turn, kendo. | precinct14 | |
21/2/2017 16:44 | Whats it got to do woth me?;) | kendonagasaki | |
21/2/2017 16:21 | Nice one precinct. So do you know if the brother of Tarquin (I guess) has access to enough ids to get a post into the "top posts" list and prove this once and for all? Or could someone else help precinct out - Kendo? How about we agree to restrict voting (up) on this post to those happy to vote with their multi-ids and see if it can get there? | 1gw | |
21/2/2017 16:19 | I do wish to state my views on RTHM might have been similar to borneobob's....his other views were very much dissimilar to mine! I treat every human being the same, until they give me cause that is. borneobob's views shall we say - were a little controversial, and I hope tongue in cheek. | barkboo | |
21/2/2017 16:04 | Well, one things for sure: having wheeled out and dusted down the trigger finger of the elder brother to one of our least eminent posters I can confirm that having more than one id is no hindrance to voting up a post more than once. This may help explain the number of votes cast in favour of Barky's recent anti-Alex post, and borneobob's anti-Semitic ravings. They were both rapidly voted up too, further suggesting one or two posters logging in, logging out, logging back in with another id, to rack the vote up like a pinball score. | precinct14 | |
21/2/2017 15:57 | Oh dear STT has been caught. | geheimnis2 | |
21/2/2017 15:54 | Pubmatic... Header Bidding Continues to Drive Global Mobile Revenue Growth "The data from PubMatic’s Q4 2016 QMI also highlights notable changes in mobile web and mobile app monetization. Mobile web remained the leading source of monetization for premium publishers, representing 66% of mobile impression volume in 2016. Mobile app paid impression volume increased at a faster rate over the year, and though a gap still remains between the two in terms of monetized impression volume, mobile apps garnered a 59% eCPM premium in Q4 2016." | sikhthetech | |
21/2/2017 15:37 | Those are different points stt. As happened the other week, I picked you up on a very specific point and asked you to justify it (or withdraw it), but you deflect with generalities and completely irrelevant information. You have the opportunity to get evidence that might support your case with a simple phone call and then post up the result, but instead choose to waste everybody's time with these tangential replies. | 1gw | |
21/2/2017 15:21 | anyway, if anyone doesn't believe multiple ids exist and small trades, layering, are used to pump and dump then that's their choice... enough time spent on this BS... | sikhthetech |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions