We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rhythmone | LSE:RTHM | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYW0RC64 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 169.50 | 168.00 | 171.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
21/2/2017 12:54 | Thanks for posting all these links STT. it does seem bit robotic and spammy though wafting through them all. Any chance you could give a short description of what's in the articles though so I know whether to read them or not. Spammy spam spam | lance corporal winstanley ash | |
21/2/2017 12:51 | Talking Programmatic | sikhthetech | |
21/2/2017 12:11 | OK, STT, that's interesting. So you made an allegation "When a poster, using multiple ids, votes for his own posts, it doesn't appear in 'Top Posts'" You effectively repeated it very recently in the post below. You now have some credible evidence that it is not true - reported advfn helpdesk response. But you're not withdrawing the allegation. Do you have any evidence at all that it was once true? How about at least following up with advfn yourself to see if they can get you out of the hole you've dug yourself into? -------------------- Sikhthetech 19 Feb '17 - 23:28 - 780 of 804 1 1 Precinct, yes, the 14 votes up for Barky's post... The gang and their multiple ids agreeing with Barky.. I wonder which gang member voted your post down... BARKBOO 17 Feb '17 - 13:34 - 4894 of 4919 14 1 -------------------- precinct14 19 Feb '17 - 19:52 - 4920 of 4933 2 1 Can anyone explain how this post, which is way in front, doesn't even appear at the bottom, let alone where it should supposedly be, at the top of the 'top posts' listings? BARKBOO 17 Feb '17 - 13:34 - 4894 of 4919 14 1 ... | 1gw | |
21/2/2017 11:57 | The longer this coil spring is wound up, the bigger the 'twang' once it's released. We are now approaching six months since we began trading in the 35p to 40p range. | jarvis4 | |
21/2/2017 11:57 | oh look voted down within a min... hello blue stalker... sikhthetech21 Feb '17 - 11:55 - 803 of 803 0 1 Edit 1gw, | sikhthetech | |
21/2/2017 11:51 | I happen to have had the pleasure of meeting digi at more than one AGM. In my view the idea of him having more than one ID is laughable. | jarvis4 | |
21/2/2017 11:21 | STT - so just to be clear, are you now withdrawing the allegation you have made in the past that when a poster uses multiple ids to vote for a post these votes are not counted for the "top posts" ranking? This is the problem with making unsubstantiated accusations. When one of them turns out to be false it undermines the credibility of your other posts. -------------------- sikhthetech 1 Sep '14 - 08:30 - 14010 of 14597 5 0 Caught yet again.... digi has been caught dozens of times, using his multiple ids to post lies... There are a group of posters with multiple ids, posting lies to manipulate others... When a poster, using multiple ids, votes for his own posts, it doesn't appear in 'Top Posts'... | 1gw | |
21/2/2017 11:09 | Precinct, exactly... so many just happen to look in and just happens all want to vote up posts to highlight and discredit posters the so called 'family' don't like and who can't be swayed... | sikhthetech | |
21/2/2017 10:58 | How can we restore faith in programmatic for brands? | sikhthetech | |
21/2/2017 10:50 | 1gw, as I've posted on the other thread... there have been lots of posts, perfectly clean, which have not appeared in top posts.. If I spot any, I will post them up... | sikhthetech | |
21/2/2017 10:40 | 1gw, there have been lots of posts which have been perfectly clean, no offensive words, but have not appeared in top posts... If I spot another, I'll post it up... | sikhthetech | |
21/2/2017 10:27 | Well I have to say, although we have apparently cleared up the top posts issue, I don't think we're any nearer to clearing up the multi-id theory - i.e. the theory that some posters use a number of different ids to allow them to vote up posts they approve of. On this I tend to agree with precinct (post 792) in this particular case. And even without the dynamic ip address issue, I still find it difficult to believe that advfn would have any effective way of spotting determined multi-ids given the advfn registration process. | 1gw | |
21/2/2017 10:09 | thanks 1gw for being proactive and a lot more should be like that on here ie. by emailing or phone the copmany instead of asking the same old questions here day in day out | football | |
21/2/2017 10:07 | Thanks, 1gw. Edit: I should also have asked them whether it's possible, as Barkboo has claimed in the past, for a poster to check on whether a new poster shares the same IP address as an established poster. From what they told you, that seems unlikely. | precinct14 | |
21/2/2017 09:58 | Gordon - thanks for that..I hope Johnny Boy gets the message! | barkboo |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions