Woodford Patient Capital Share Discussion Threads

[1tcm1] 11/6/2018 09:37

The sky is definitely falling on WPCT tomorrow. RM2 is definitely going phut.

sined TOPVEST (today's assined operative of the ltcm! moniker)

[ltcm1] 11/6/2018 09:23

Can someone ask this tomorrow please???

If RM2 does go bust how much will have WPCT lost in this venture???

[chuckol] 11/6/2018 09:15

Yaawn. Sorry for the halitosis, Tom, erm yours, not mine! LOL



Just bants, winnie.

[careful] 11/6/2018 08:52

AGM tomorrow.

[saltraider] 11/6/2018 00:31

ltcm1 ... no, Stobart will not shine any light whatsoever on WPCT. Why, for heaven's sake, should it?

Take your Woodford vendetta somewhere else, please. It's extremely boring. It benefits no-one.

It seems to be all that you have and I am sorry about that and pity you a little ... but it's of no relevance whatsoever to WPCT.

[ltcm1] 10/6/2018 21:43

Solonic I am sorry you feel that way. It's only meant to be bants at the end of the day.

Do think this Stobart case might shine a light onto Woodford though.

Let's see what the AGM brings and take it from there. Good luck to all WPCT holders.

How much lost in RM2 though???!!!

[truthteller3] 10/6/2018 14:52

Well said, solonic, and well put. You did forget, though, to say that the 8% are more witty and much funnier than the minis.

[solonic] 10/6/2018 14:43

"topvest" your dishonesty is stunning. There is nobody on this thread that ever, ever presents Woodford as a genius.

There are two types of posts here in general. There are those from the (beautifully newly named) miniwinnies who represent 92% of the posts here and whose sordid, stale, unscrupulous but relentless negativity is believed by nobody except yourselves. The other 8% are, mostly, more intelligent, more articulate, more logical and certainly more truthful, but never adulatory of Neil Woodford. That's just another fiction that you miniwinnies attempt to perpetuate.

Paradoxically, if the count was not that of the number of negative posts but rather the number of negative authors,there would be a drastic reduction from the 92% to (and I'm being probably too kind here) perhaps 4 people at the most. This is what riles the vast majority of readers of this site. The monotony of the voice suffocates us.

[topvest] 10/6/2018 14:40

No problem. Would be interesting for someone attending to report back.

[harveydee] 10/6/2018 13:54

Yes, I hold my hand up to not seeing the date written in the latest annual report. However, I was basing my information on this website, which was only updated on Friday: hxxps://woodfordfunds.com/funds/wpct/agm/

I was also basing my information on more than one email sent recently to Woodford, asking when the agm would be. They didn't bother to reply.

I own shares in wpct, albeit greatly reduced from times gone by and have attended both agms held so far.

Sorry if this fact doesn't fit the narrative of those who wish to see all criticism of Woodford and wpct as an evil troll conspiracy.

[minerve] 10/6/2018 13:48

You’re right. I did not check. Why waste time in the chimp cage?

[mochyn] 10/6/2018 09:06

Saltraider, I really like that. The miniwinnies! LOL LOL.


And harveydeeminus! Bloody priceless.

[mochyn] 10/6/2018 09:01

"THAT" share price 'crowd' again. Malevolent, maleficent, and utterly incompetent. Caught out in their fatuous lies twice in 3 days.

And Minerve, the blustering Minerve! He never learns the lesson to check his facts before bursting into choleric print. He really is not a very impressive performer. Absolutely no rigour.

Being caught out, in the way they have been, will not stop them, of course. That's because they have no shame. And they wonder why they struggle to make their exiguous living selling financial advice to suckers.

Don't make me laugh, please: it hurts my side.

[1tcm1] 09/6/2018 22:54

Of course winnie will lie and deny he had anything to do with this misinformed post:

"ltcm1 9 Jun '18 - 13:48 - 3228 of 3237

It's a red flag in my book when companies act in this manner. Makes you think he has something to hide."


Hee hee: jumping on a bandwagon that simply wasn't there! LOL LOL LOL

[saltraider] 09/6/2018 22:43

Couldn't agree more, trollwatch. But it's useful that they have exposed themselves so clearly as the malicious lying trolls they truly are. Let's keep 3235 in mind as the post to play back each time Harveydeeminus, topvest, ltcm1, minerve or any of the other mini-Winnifroths show up with their scabby lies and distortions.

[trollwatch] 09/6/2018 22:26

Three real losers, and there's more!

[topvest] 09/6/2018 17:14

jonwig - yes, you are correct. Not quite sure what the issue is then.

[ltcm1] 09/6/2018 15:06

Interesting perspective tv, it is good to have differing viewpoints too.

I am no fan of Purp as a long term business but what can't be denied is the valuation has been benchmarked by the recent placing, so it does look set to be around for a while at least.

Intelligent AI for me has validity in that if it worked it could become a profit monster, so it is possible to see how the valuation could change very rapidly. I accept that is a big 'if' though.

It would be interesting if someone here were to research the initial investments and current valuations of the non Biotechs in WPCT. For me it would be much better quality of information that these weights, that tell you nothing really.

AJ Bell - a winner is a winner, no matter where it originated. It seems a shame he sold it off though.