Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[mavfav] 27/1/2020 20:37

Skipper the one question I have for CS is this If you genuinely believe that the company is bad and the share price is only going one way then why oh why have you not sold every single share you have in the company?I can tell you why so it's obviously simple. You don't hold any shares here at all or you don't believe what you are saying. If you do hold then you express the lack of logic.I know nooothing

[mavfav] 27/1/2020 20:34

Out of interest loglorry1 and please enlighten me.What shares do you currently hold? I'm interested to know and will do my own researchI never stop learning and am always open to someone else wisdom.You constantly attack VRS a share I've done significant research into and more importantly not just about the past or the now but also the future. I've researched both down and up the supply chain. I've looked at future potential and all aspects And yes I don't know if VRS graphene would be included in any of those but I do know the potential is massive absolutely massive.I want anyone out there to look at that and make up their own minds and not follow my thinking. If they do then I hope they follow their research and invest in a company that has that potential to blow their mind as it does mine.I know nooothing

[the skipper] 27/1/2020 20:27

Clubbie, as you claim to hold stock here has it never occurred to you what the consequences might be of NR throwing in the towel thanks to your constant criticism of him? If I were in Neil’s shoes and was not happy with who was appointed as my successor I would take my knowledge of the processes used to create FLG to another company, possibly a competitor, but otherwise one of the Global giants I had been talking to with a view to processing the stuff in house. I’d also be selling down my huge shareholding ASAP. From where I sit the consequences of that on my personal wealth are not something I would want to contemplate, but maybe you just don’t care about the impact it would have on yourself and your family as you do certainly appear to have lost the plot.

[rogerbridge] 27/1/2020 20:14

I second that Mavfav.

[mavfav] 27/1/2020 20:08

I don't think I have ever heard of anyone who is not invested in a company, stating quite vehemently that the CEO, who shareholders back, should be sacked.I don't want my CEO taking just any old deal.I don't want my CEO thinking of the next couple of months and not yearsI certainly don't want to hear the words of an untrustworthy anonymous poster saying he's fed up of hearing stuff that shows their words as being false and incompetent I will admit I know nooothing but damn I know more than some

[hoverflyman] 27/1/2020 20:03

Anyone want verified few layer graphene? Your only option is VRS, simples.

[rogerbridge] 27/1/2020 20:00

CS, I take your point, but we are talking about a long term strategy that will make millions for all concerned.

Its not take the money and run, there is far more value to be created by monetising the technology over the LONG TERM.

I know what you intend to write now, so no need to bother.

[compoundup] 27/1/2020 19:54

I have had Loglorry on filter for years. Some of the LTHs will remember Sg1 posting a picture a very long time ago of an artic lorry high in the air impaled on a huge log. I had applied the filter by then. I guess from what I am seeing here that he is still unable to accept that some of us are more interested in VRS' direction of travel and how the number of lucrative destinations continue to multiply than the short term share price He certainly has stamina. I wonder how much breaking news he can stand? Actually no. I don't care.

[luckyorange] 27/1/2020 19:51

Just a point, on any sales that Neill may have made he would have paid a high proportion of tax, I have heard that shorters use any method possible to hide their earnings and someone said about cash being channeled through a pizza company.

Any tax inspectors on here that would like to dig and delve?

[club sandwich] 27/1/2020 19:47

"They are in a better position to make that decision rather than the poster. " Well clearly they're not, because it is a simple matter of fact that if they had taken 150p in cash they would, as of today, have been able to buy twice as many shares. I doubt this calamitous share price drop is what they *thought* would happen - who among us did? - but it's undeniable fact that it *has* happened...

[turbocharge] 27/1/2020 19:45

adejuk: "in the end it comes down to a simple question, do you trust nr?"

The only question shareholders need to consider is do they have trust in their own research and have faith in their decision to invest in VRS!

As far as our 'friend' adejuk is concerned, the one and only real question is can we believe that adejuk holds even a single VRS share, or is he simply a subtle de-ramper hoping to get his grubby paws on the shares at a much lower price?

Even as NR continues to put 100% into Versarien and is completely trustworthy, adejuk continues to act innocent and clever - will he succeed with his crafty game, can we trust adejuk, the jury's out...

[rogerbridge] 27/1/2020 19:32

Good evening, I have been out all day and just catching up on posts.

There was a comment earlier on The directors of Gnanomat, would have been better taking 150p, cash rather than VRS stock.

They are in a better position to make that decision rather than the poster. Gnanomat are partnering the only verified producer of Graphene in the world. They are aware, for their technology to work well, they need VRS graphene.

It is a win win partnership and good for both companies. Gnanomat have some exceptionally smart technology and the energy storage and EV, transport and aircraft battery markets are gigantic.

Further, Gnanomat are aware of timescales for these technologies to be commonplace, Roberto said this himself on his first interview.

People do not comprehend the huge opportunities here and as Neill has stated many times, we are not opening a corner shop.

There are obviously some, desperate to keep the so down, to be honest and in my mind, the risk reward ratio is now firmly pointing to reward. I am going to look down the back of the sofa once more.

[clint fleecewood] 27/1/2020 19:31

Oh my stars! I've seen some rubbish on here but:
'I couldn't do it myself, knowing how many people will have their savings wiped out'
made me cover the monitor in soup.

BTW LL is not interested in truth or whether NR is or isn't a conman as long as the share price goes down to his short price.

[vice versa] 27/1/2020 19:23

https://phys.org/news/2020-01-lab-trash-valuable-graphene.amp?__twitter_impression=true

[vice versa] 27/1/2020 19:20

L.O. with ref. to:Tesla seem to be using graphene batteries in mobile phone powerbank launching Tuesday (according to @graphene twitter).Have looked up the info on twitter #graphene again. It is apparently Tesla graphene batteries in a new powerbank being launched on Indiegogo, a crowd-funding site 28th Jan 8a.m. Pacific time from memory. So I'm confused now. Not Teslalaunch then, my mistake, but the segment claims using Tesla graphene batteries.During my search just now came across interesting piece on graphene from rubbish. I will put it up.

[mavfav] 27/1/2020 19:12

Interestingly loglorry1 seems to think that anyone who starts a company and invests all their money and time and effort should not receive an appropriate level of remuneration.If you look at NR then you'll see that has never been the case as he has effectively underpaid.The long term strategy of the company is and will be played out and time will demonstrate that the company has been very astute.When could Neill actually sell shares anyway. He sees months ahead and is severely restricted on time frames and these have to be approved Neill will possibly never really be able to sell his shares unless we were all bought out at a later date. A way later dateI know nooothing

[club sandwich] 27/1/2020 19:07

Roger, I think you've got it wrong. The clock is ticking on the career of the rank incompetent running VRS, not the shorters...

stick to cartoons, mate, you're really not very good at anything else...

You looked at the share price lately? shocking...

[rogerthegrouch] 27/1/2020 18:51

Even when he is called out for trying desperately to close his short by the end of the month he continues to trash as hard as possible. Does he feel no shame? Silly, but rhetorical.

Tick tock Tim.

[luckyorange] 27/1/2020 18:49

He knows that those who sell to pay their taxes will have finished now, it is a very logworrying time for him.

[loglorry1] 27/1/2020 18:48

Incidentally, Neil has taken £millions out of VRS, not hundreds of thousands of pounds, especially when considering his ever increasing salary for successfully spiking the shares on a temporary basis. I couldn't do it myself, knowing how many people will have their savings wiped out, but I suppose that's why he's more "successful" than me.

FWIW, I think his share sales at 61.5p will be seen in hindsight as a masterstroke in years to come. Not only that, but his sales at 29.5p will be similarly viewed as great sales, compared to what other people eventually end up with.

Bookmark this post, if you like. The eventual restoration to a proper market value (below 10p) won't happen immediately, but there will be a gradual grind down - just as there has been from 190p to today's 74p.

Sure, there'll be a few spikes along the way as Neill does what he does, but he isn't a magician. Nods and winks will only get you so far.