Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[chelsea101] 14/1/2020 06:06

Festario, Why would Terrance Barkan respond to you? He has probably seen your posts and knows you are totally irrelevant with your wild claims about your VRS share ownership. You live in a complete fantasy land!

[evergreen8] 14/1/2020 04:08

What a joyous post from Terrance Barkan, highly regarded member of the Graphene Council, confirming that the reports of his comments are complete fabrications expounding the opposite of his position.

This small group responsible for pushing these lies consist of no more than five individuals with multiple on line identities who have heavily leveraged bets agains Versarien succeeding and are willing to go to any lengths to save their skins with every lie and malicious element of misinformation that they can use to serve their own ends.

Amazingly, the naysayers that posted the lies of what Mr Barkan was falsely alleged to have said are continuing to suggest that their lies are true And are now challenging the integrity of Mr Barkan for having the audacity of suggesting otherwise.

They simply have no understanding of the fact that they have been exposed beyond salvation as utter liars and have as a consequence lost all credibility.

It brings to mind Monty Python’s Black Knight having been dismembered limb from limb still not having the capacity to recognise utter defeat and still trying to fight on.

Well, their loss, the tide is about to turn, commercial deals are about to land and they are going to have their legs cut from under them.

[mavfav] 14/1/2020 02:03

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-13/wsp-is-said-to-approach-rival-engineering-firm-aecom-about-dealAnyone know who AECOM are? I mean I've heard of WSP I know nooothing

[mutantcar] 14/1/2020 00:56

Anyone want to buy some gold? I've not bothered with that hallmark rubbish, but it is definitely gold, it's all shiny & everything. £100 an ounce, I can get you tonnes of it by container from China. DM me if interested.

[shavian] 14/1/2020 00:55

Woody, PM’d you

[festario] 14/1/2020 00:39

It's of no consequence to me, well, very little anyway... only 80k shares left to dump when I'm happy with the price.But... everything is becoming more bizarre and farcical about VRS everyday.

[1teepee] 14/1/2020 00:33

I think you, clubby and loggy should be embarrassed

[the skipper] 14/1/2020 00:33

Well you won't get rid of me as easily TW, and I see you don't deny anything in the article I posted. You might wish to bear in mind that I am only going to post stuff here which is or was already in the public realm, but there is some solid evidence I have obtained privately which could do you much more damage in the right hands. I just need to find someone who has the time and motivation to see it through to its logical conclusion. Neill Ricketts would be an ideal candidate should you succeed in your campaign to bring him down, but I am sure there must be plenty of others who have an axe to grind against you and I will be more than happy to work with them to ensure you get your just deserts, should you be unable to contain your arrogance and misplaced bravado.

[1teepee] 14/1/2020 00:31

Fest why are you being a tit? Terrance is way more knowledgeable than you

[1teepee] 14/1/2020 00:25

Mr BarkanIf you are reading can you please tell James Baker to stop mentioning the head Tennis racket as having graphene in it.DID YOU NOT SEE HIS MESSAGE TO EMAIL HIM DIRECTLY!

[superg1] 14/1/2020 00:24

Hover

More or less immediately following the graphene verification for VRS XG admitted they don't do graphene.

They classified graphene as anything under 10 layers and declared their product is 10+ layer graphene nano platelets, a definition which they conveniently found to fit.

Professor Robert Young of Manchester calls such graphene, graphite platelets, for a good reason.

As 95% plus out there can't do graphene there is resistance to accept the standard. If they do they are no longer graphene producers.
There is massive difference between quality graphene platelets and multi layer graphite. Hence there is massive difference in price, anyone can and does produce graphite platelets, near all of them try to call it graphene.

When the circle turns in full, they will be hung out to dry.

[festario] 14/1/2020 00:18

I think Terrance has embarrassed himself tonight, and his organisation the Graphene Council.Sadly, by association, he's embarrassed VRS as well.By the way, why does he call the company VRS? Why does he's not consistently say Versarien?Why refer to a company by its stock market ticker?He hasn't replied to me to confirm or deny whether he or his organisation have a financial interest in VRS shares.I think that needs clearing up PDQ.

[superg1] 14/1/2020 00:13

Mr Barkan

If you are reading can you please tell James Baker to stop mentioning the head Tennis racket as having graphene in it.

The 'graphene' is in the throat of the racker and is XG sciences M grade which does not qualify as graphene.

So I find it embarrassing when he mentions it from time to time.

Robert young who you will know well as a lead in the field

'it is demonstrated that the nanoparticles employed in the racquet are most probably graphite nanoplatelets'

'the M5 nanoplatelets with a thickness of 6–8 nm (~25 individual graphene layers thick) show a broad peak at around 2680 cm−1 with a lower wavenumber shoulder.'

I actually found the original tests done by scientists and sent them to staff connected to Manchester.

I find it incredible that the lead at doesn't know his graphite from his graphene. If he doesn't why is he in charge?

There are various examples on the web where he keeps saying it???.

[bbmsionlypostafter] 14/1/2020 00:03

Hey, where's bgt1 gone to?

All his posts are gone & there's no record of anyone with that user name on ADVFN. Very odd but I'm confident his disappearance has absolutely nothing to do with TW announcing this afternoon his intentions to sue bgt1 for libel.

LLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!

[superg1] 14/1/2020 00:00

Wuzy

In the header.

If it is Mr Barkan as it seems to be, he is very passionate about all this junk out there and called for 'graphene' producers to cough up and submit their graphene for testing.

And Tim if you missed it even Ray at Haydale struggled to find some. I think it was said out of just over 200 different suppliers only 5 had anything that could really be called graphene.

[wuzy] 13/1/2020 23:55

We're can l find the post from Terence Barken,cheers

[superg1] 13/1/2020 23:51

They are we known for it pheonixs

The passage of time will put an end to their games. They have had it far too easy for far too long.

[phoenixs] 13/1/2020 23:36

It is gratifying to read a post directly from the Graphene council contradicting a number of lies from Loglorry who has now been publicly exposed for what he is. A LIAR who is closely associated with a share tipping organisation that consistently mixes truth with lies to suit their agenda.
Says it all.

[logworry] 13/1/2020 23:30

Oh dear. I really am in the pooh now. Looks as though I have really messed up.
Festario , don’t goad me into lying anymore. It’s all your fault. Fess up and tell the truth you mutt.

[loglorry1] 13/1/2020 23:28

I'm still not totally sure what Mr. Barkan is objecting to. I attributed a statement to him that was actually James Baker that lower priced quality GNP was becoming available in much larger quantities. That's pretty much common ground. I've corrected that. I uses the term rubber stamped because it's also clear that Versarien had already used the NPL to test Nanene properties so it would be surprising if a second test gave different results. Hopefully he'll respond and answer our questions so we might gain further information on what was undertaken. It will be great if we get a detailed response and it can only support the bull case.