Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[festario] 13/1/2020 21:04

I'm interested to know of The Graphene Council, if any other Graphene producing companies are currently going through your verification process.Secondly, have any others been through your process, and not reached your requirements?Are those questions serious enough?

[mikebrenner] 13/1/2020 20:14

Can I make a suggestion that folks go back to blocking idiots and not trying to "turn them / refute them" all the time - you won't break dogma by posting on a bulletin board and often your posts are not adding value to existing or new investors ... the less oxygen you provide then the less it matters and the more folks can focus on collaborating together esp as many of you now know each other. Until VRS brings in its major deals it won't be attracting many new investors to want to buy its shares so let's focus on filtering out the noise and focusing on the business

[vice versa] 13/1/2020 20:13

Bet L.L. is barkin mad.

[russ42] 13/1/2020 20:11

Right loggy where are you now?? come and talk to the people in the know with your lies.

[1teepee] 13/1/2020 20:07

Brilliant Terrance , thanks for your amazing contribution to aid us versariens. Hopefully loggy will refrain from being awful for now on

[johnveals] 13/1/2020 20:05

date of article 5th Dec 2019



date of Graphene Flagship/Airbus RNS 18 Dec 2019

[thegraphenecouncil] 13/1/2020 19:57

Dear Loglorry1 (Timothy David Kempster)et.al.,

When you post in a public forum you had better be correct and you had better not slander. Also, if you were really interested in facts, you might contact the source and make your accusations direct, and not in some backhanded fashion.

First things first, my background is 30 years of managing international trade and professional societies on a global basis (not hawking some "Internet Products", where the hell did that come from?).

The Graphene Council was founded in 2013 as a neutral platform for the entire graphene ecosystem from raw material suppliers to end users and every stakeholder in between, including universities and standards bodies. To date we reach more than 25k materials scientists globally. We are the oldest and largest trade association for the graphene sector.

The Verified Graphene Producer™ program is the most rigorous, in-person inspection program available anywhere. It involves a physical inspection of the production facilities, review of material handling procedures for both quality control and safety issues. A random sample of material is drawn by us from the production stream and in the case of VRS, we had the sample fully characterized by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) in Teddington, UK. The NPL is arguably the most experienced and professional lab in the world to test and analyze graphene materials.

At the time we tested with NPL, the NPL lab did not know the source of the material, the test was "in the blind" so that there could be no bias or question about the independence of the testing.

VRS is the first company to successfully pass our Verified Graphene Producer™ program and they should rightfully be proud of having done so.

To be very clear, The Graphene Council and myself personally are completely independent. We do not have any interest in nor do we get commissions or incentives from any graphene company or any other company for that matter.

If anyone in this forum wants to really know what Terrance Barkan from The Graphene Council says, you can ask me: [e-mail]

p.s. Serious queries only, no hate mail and no time wasters. We are a serious organization serving a serious industry.

[davemac3] 13/1/2020 19:37

why aren't VRS mentioned here?

[club sandwich] 13/1/2020 19:22

Funny how that post of mikebrenner's wasn't moderated. Almost like there's an attempt at a cover-up going on...

[mikebrenner] 13/1/2020 19:18

For folks interested in UK materials companies doing deals in China look no further than Victrex with their recently announced JV ... different proposed model and business needs re capital to VRS but tapping into the same opportunity https://www.investegate.co.uk/victrex-plc--vct-/rns/joint-venture/202001130846435673Z/

[bbmsionlypostafter] 13/1/2020 18:55

This is the level of self delusion amongst the VRS/NR cult, that this idiot thinks any company involved in industries like Nuclear or Aviation would 1) accept the word of a manufacturer on any product without checking it themselves & 2) not have the equipment or suitably qualified and experienced staff to do this.

What planet do you cult members live on?

sandbag
13 Jan '20 - 18:43 - 89192 of 89192
0 1 0

I've read some absolute tosh on this board but hindsight2's post 89175 is up there with the best of them. To think that industries like Nuclear or Aviation could buy any product without it being verified by an industry authority is just crazy. As for testing the material themselves they may not have the equipment or suitably qualified and experienced staff to do this. They will buy what has been verified and is exactly what it says on the tin.

[rainbow23] 13/1/2020 18:52

The mugs desperately trying to bale out now should have taken my advice a year ago when I told them that this was a no hope share running on hot air fom Ricketts. They've now found out who was right and it wasn't them.

[sandbag] 13/1/2020 18:43

I've read some absolute tosh on this board but hindsight2's post 89175 is up there with the best of them. To think that industries like Nuclear or Aviation could buy any product without it being verified by an industry authority is just crazy. As for testing the material themselves they may not have the equipment or suitably qualified and experienced staff to do this. They will buy what has been verified and is exactly what it says on the tin.

[jointer13] 13/1/2020 18:34

Smacks of desperation....tick tock...

[turbocharge] 13/1/2020 18:31

hindsight2: "Never commented on this before but have followed with interest and I'm not a holder. Anyone who thinks "verification" has any value may well be deluding themselves, any high value purchaser will a) expect the product to meet specification and b) will test to ensure it does anyway. They will do this irrespective of whether the supplier has some sort of verification or ISO label attached so it's nothing that merits any particular value to a purchaser. Good to put out on an RNS and spin spin spin."

Never looked into the profile of hindsight2, nor have I been able to follow him with interest before as this is his first ever post on ADVFN since registering in 2008. Sounds like one of the dormant accounts of the shorters being brought to life to help them with their disinformation and scaremongering. These false prophets always claim they 'follow the company with interest' and then proceed to post unfounded rubbish to discredit the company. So posts from this particular poster contain nothing that merits any particular value. I thought it would be good to put a RNS out to clarify that posts by hindsight2 are spin spin spin.

[jointer13] 13/1/2020 18:28

You keep saying to leave us in peace....you appear to be very restless...never mind.

Do your lol bit again.

[loglorry1] 13/1/2020 18:23

Yeah Airbus RNS Reach eg nomad doesn't deem it material. Nuff said.

As I said will leave you in peace for a bit. See where you can ramp it to.

[loglorry1] 13/1/2020 18:18

You are right I should leave you in peace to ramp the share price up some more.

You never know the NOMAD might allow Neill back on Twitter soon. That should help.

[aquaesulis01] 13/1/2020 18:18

loglorry, ONCE AGAIN "AT COMMERCIAL SCALE" "AT COMMERCIAL SCALE" "AT COMMERCIAL SCALE" "AT COMMERCIAL SCALE" "AT COMMERCIAL SCALE" "AT COMMERCIAL SCALE"

And I have yet to see a competitor with a data sheet that boasts 60% < 5 layers with minimal defect rate