Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[alchemy] 13/11/2019 14:50

Wow if that's a good faith rumour - Scorchio.

[volsung] 13/11/2019 14:49

Looking to top up at 89p

[cheek212] 13/11/2019 14:44

I've heard rumour that Premier Xi Jinping will be attending the next signing session with NR as he personally wants to show the US that they are leading the way with Graphene and to stick it up em - them and their trade war. Going to happen on 28th November just to really pee off Trump. That's the rumour going round here anyway.

[rainbow23] 13/11/2019 14:39

Maybe someone will post a photo of a dozen chinamen sitting at a table holding pens and the price will rocket. Ricketts is taking the rampers for mugs and they can't see it. They're being fleeced rotten.

[rheumking] 13/11/2019 14:35

True that may be the sign we are looking for lucky !

[jimboau] 13/11/2019 14:29

A day of reckoning, a massive sell off moves ever closer.

[alchemy] 13/11/2019 14:21

It might be results to be announced before thundering RNS is causing this? Up for discussion .

[luckyorange] 13/11/2019 14:01

Waiting for Ian to sell before he announces anything rheumking 😉

[forestfred] 13/11/2019 14:00

Troll trolls trolls
Feeding frenzy

It’s like throwing chips to seagulls look at them .
I’m smiling honestly .

Shares go up and down always have done always will .
I’ll top and thank the trolls later


That’s how it works out big picture has not changed as far as I’m aware .

Ff

[club sandwich] 13/11/2019 13:48

Yeah but his 'hints' - if that is what they are - never bloody come to anything, do they? How long has he been banging on about Tesla for, and... nothing.

[loglorry1] 13/11/2019 13:48

Thanks @metis20. I think later when pressed he added that they said "products containing graphene would have..." The official estimates from GEIC etc. have been much closer to £200m p.a. and they are considered by many to be very high.

Also this contains single layer and other types of Graphene that VRS can't produce.

[rheumking] 13/11/2019 13:43

I wonder as it’s a bit of a random comment if he is reverting to form and giving us a hint about upcoming good news . But I promised myself I would stop listening to such speculation as it’s very unpredictable!

[metis20] 13/11/2019 13:38

"I was told yesterday by a UK gov official that within 5yrs China is indicated it will need £200bn of graphene, I can not verify this atm but we would need a few more people."

8:39 AM - 13 Jan 2018 from Shanghai, People's Republic of China

[scottishfield] 13/11/2019 13:36

Another dollop here. Tiresome currently, but will be worthwhile in the long run.

[loglorry1] 13/11/2019 13:31

ClubSandwich wrote:
Or maybe it's somthing to do with Woody tweeting that the graphene market will only be worth £300m pa by 2027 and people realising that VRS might not deliver billions in a few years, as we all hoped?

What happened to Ricketts' tweets that China needs $200bn of graphene in the next 5 years? Was that a negligent misrepresentation - or a fraudulent one?

You see this is classic Ricketts. The real story when he was pressed on this was that apparently on the plane on a China trip one of the China delegation said to him that they thought PRODUCTS CONTAINING GRAPHENE might reach $200bn in the next 5 years.

He then went around quoting something a bit similar getting everyone excited.

If a mobile phone costs $600 and contains 10c of Graphene Oxide (very cheap to make) in its battery then you can see how misleading this is.

Neill will obviously say he didn't intend to ramp and was truthful. This is what makes him a great promoter but it's deliberately misleading in my book.

[adejuk] 13/11/2019 13:28

we're a sitting duck

[fireball xl5] 13/11/2019 13:27

Looks like we are warming up for something and I'm not referring to log burners. Just another day on the VRS board.

[loglorry1] 13/11/2019 13:27

He's not very wealthy yet (by AIM CEO standards) he still needs to sell his stock. I'm sure he'll get rid of it some way or other though.

[pshevlin] 13/11/2019 13:25

"Log burners are carbon neutral." Not in the short term. It requires a lot more trees to be planted long term to get that effect and it's not happening fast enough. Just saying.

[alchemy] 13/11/2019 13:25

Ooo minus 8 , thank goodness we have five Unicorn strings! One would do over time.But this although low volume signals something awry timing wise at the very least.

[alchemy] 13/11/2019 13:22

Not on terms of "working capital" of CO2. So Amazon forest fires ok.I think your point might technical be true over time if replanting takes place. But inaccurate in the real world. Some awful second order effects too'

[festario] 13/11/2019 13:20

Thanks for mentioning me. Risking a ban and all that.No, it wasn't me.I'd have to sell all my family member's shares out of SIPP or ISA to sell that many. Some at a big loss.No, I did my selling between 120p and 110p for the most part, seeing as you ask.