Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[mandatory] 12/11/2019 12:14

That’s good to hear Wuzy.

Cheers

M

[wuzy] 12/11/2019 12:12

At the last AGM l asked Neill wether anyone else had applied for verification he said many had but not been successful so it's still a great feather in our cap, he also said it would not bother him to much if there were other companys that were accredited as he thinks that their is enough room for everyone to be successful.

[dreamtwister] 12/11/2019 12:07

mining is pricing graphite pending flake size "tgc" total graphite content.

china are filling wharehouses to the rafters with quality flake graphite.

as supply meets demand will push the prices higher,china are the dominate graphite

producers....." will versarien be able to compete with competition."

[club sandwich] 12/11/2019 12:01

grabster - why? They don't need more collabs, more partners, what they need is monetistion, but Ricketts seems utterly incapable of actually getting a deal over the line.

[loglorry1] 12/11/2019 12:00

@schmally do you always resort to name calling when you dissagree with an opinion? It's a bit childish.

[grabster] 12/11/2019 11:57

I hope that point is displayed big at every trade show - it certainly should be. It should be THE big banner across every Versarien stand. Disappointed if they aren't doing so.

[schmally] 12/11/2019 11:56

Loggy, Is your dyslexia setting in again. I don't recall any LTH posts saying VRS orders will be "years away". Sorry if I've missed something

[schmally] 12/11/2019 11:50

Loggy, How many more times, Stop making misleading comments. Where did I say Terence was a scientist. I didn't. I used the word "these are" as in multiple people ("scientists AND experts in their field"). I think it's safe to suggest Terence is an expert in his field and knows how to build global relationships and get industries/businesses working together. Next...

[forestfred] 12/11/2019 11:43

Jointer13
Verified Graphene

Perhaps it’s because they can’t get their graphene verified because they don’t believe it would meet the standards required .

As you say why would you not .

Thoughts welcome .

Pleased I’m invested in one that has .. oh sorry I meant
THE Only ONE THAT HAS.

Out of all the GRAPHENE producers on the planet .



Ff

[loglorry1] 12/11/2019 11:42

@richgrumpa if sales are years away while other companies are scaling up production to meet current demand why would you pay a massive premium for VRS over other companies market cap?

Surely the idea of buying shares in VRS at £165m market cap is becuause they are about to bring on very large sales?

There are plenty of start-up companies out there with huge potential for sale at £5m market cap. To get further they have to prove their business model. So far after a few years VRS has not proven they have a business as they have not sold their product (legacy business aside).

[markster66] 12/11/2019 11:40

I'm starting to like you Teepee, you have an uncanny ability in identifying bitter and resentful cretins such as our beloved resident Billwave, who's posts are as interesting as the diary of a train spotter.

[loglorry1] 12/11/2019 11:29

@jointer nobody said we didn't need standards. ISO are working on one I believe. So what? Further nobody is denying lots of "fake" graphene exists.

Do you think NanoXplore who are building a factory to produce 10,000 tonnes of graphene a year targetting $15/kg with clients like Ford Motors (I think they moved from XGS) are one of these "fake" producers?

Just because there are fake copies out there it doesn't mean that a handful of real prodcuers don't also exist. Do you think Sixth Elements who supply Huawai are sellign "fake" graphene?

There's very little barrier to entry here and many real producers most producing and selling GnP to customers. VRS is way behind the curve.

[richgrumpa] 12/11/2019 11:26

Always mildly amusing to note the usual suspects claiming to know exactly how long the various collaborations ought to take to bear fruit.They seem to imagine that what Versarien is involved in is merely the tweaking of existing technology or processes, rather than embarking on what is, without doubt, the next Industrial Revolution.Perhaps the company should look to recruit these guys to hurry things along a bit ;)

[loglorry1] 12/11/2019 11:23

@schmally

I'm sure that Terence and his associates in the GC, would have no difficulty forging high flying and exceptionally well paid careers working for businesses using or producing graphene or that want to develop graphene solutions.

These are well respected scientists and experts in their field,

Stop lying isn't a well known Graphene scientiest. He's had a carreer in social media!

[mandatory] 12/11/2019 11:21

Jointer,

Totally agree in the advantage that Verified Graphene Producer status bestows on VRS and it’s shareholders currently.

I hope we can leverage it and turn it into actual money to spend on beer and new cars before someone else gains that status too.

Cheers

[jointer13] 12/11/2019 11:06

if you have the real mccoy...you would get it verified...why wouldn't you..?

[jointer13] 12/11/2019 10:58

versarien...the only company on the planet to complete the Graphene Council's Verified Graphene Producer programme.

"This is a huge validation of our technology and will enable our partners and potential customers to have confidence that the graphene we produce meets globally accepted standards."

surely that says it all about verification.

its all about the quality.

[1teepee] 12/11/2019 10:56

It was the right one, no need to apologize

[schmally] 12/11/2019 10:40

Keep kidding yourselves Loggy and bbm. So now you' appear to be suggesting the Graphene Council's only motivation is to generate income via setting up a pointless tick box verification programme. Yeah, right ok.

I'm sure that Terence and his associates in the GC, would have no difficulty forging high flying and exceptionally well paid careers working for businesses using or producing graphene or that want to develop graphene solutions.

These are well respected scientists and experts in their field, not some shady shysters. They are motivated by getting the science fully understood, accessible and for companies like VRS and their existing and prospective business partners to help enhance global industries that will beneficially impact all our lives.

I'm in no doubt why other companies are reluctant to go through the verification programme, it's because it's comprehensive, complex and bloody difficult to be successful. How will any major global companies have confidence to use suppliers without formalised verification programmes and ISO standards being developed.

Some may have pushed out some quick low cost products to market and are generating an income, but if they fail to get their products and manufacturing processes verified in years to come, their opportunities will significantly diminish.

[wr63] 12/11/2019 10:25

Bbm, do you know for a fact that no other company has entered the Graphene Council testing?

[bbmsionlypostafter] 12/11/2019 10:25

What does acp stand for?