We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Versarien Plc | LSE:VRS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8YZTJ80 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.0675 | 0.065 | 0.07 | 0.069 | 0.065 | 0.07 | 81,236,669 | 16:35:21 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemicals & Chem Preps, Nec | 5.45M | -13.53M | -0.0091 | -0.08 | 1M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
19/9/2019 10:45 | the thing is by the very fact that he said it....its got to be close. | jointer13 | |
19/9/2019 10:32 | BIGT I bet Chris is saying FFS I wish I'd never said it now. All he was saying that was they would seek to get it pre AGM as if they don't they would need an EGM in the next financial year if another country wanted 15%. The whole point is that China is the platform to roll out to other countries, so once they have whatever is the right deal for VRS in China, then that will set the standard. In truth that most of the noisy BIGT crew want in for the BIGT news so they can cash in and trade elsewhere, they had been in for the trade. That can include gearing and CFDs. CFDs in particular on the "Where is the news" screams as the deadline line to pay up with cash they don't have on a position they got for not one penny leaving their account in share purchases. What a mad system for gamblers with money troubles, it should be illegal imo. | superg1 | |
19/9/2019 10:30 | I didn't see that lift coming without any news, any ideas? Happened a bit quick for just a change of direction in the trading range IMO. | billwave | |
19/9/2019 10:24 | its all about building the company in the right way... the sure way...now ready for the next stage... completing the verified graphene producer programme.... means a hell of a lot. all good for us shareholders. | jointer13 | |
19/9/2019 10:21 | Remember all the pumping re Bluejay, EVRH, TERN AND OTHERS. Same old events and sources pumping the same old types of Piles of dung. Pump and dump sorted, then onto the next one. | superg1 | |
19/9/2019 10:20 | VRS are real, they are givers, not spiv takers. They really do have collaborations with various huge companies worldwide, some are leaders in their sector. They really do have huge interest from the Chinese government and stacking up similar interest from Japan, South Korea, India and the US. They've even had offers for taking stakes of 29.9% of the company. VRS has more significantly more going on thaN the 50 or so combined, on my watch list. | superg1 | |
19/9/2019 10:03 | Excellent copy and paste from the super g string archive of paragraphs about stupid investors. | 1teepee | |
19/9/2019 10:00 | axo....as long as it bounces, I can live with the error | molatovkid | |
19/9/2019 09:59 | Not really as I think they are in Europe somewhere. Unless they in Spain | 1teepee | |
19/9/2019 09:56 | Superg. Back in July Neill did state in the RNS "Testing of new equipment is underway which, if successful, would expand our production capacity to up to 30 tonnes per annum of high quality graphene. ". That implies to me they already have the equipment on site as you can't test a theory.I don't believe this is being done to solve a demand but i would expect companies like AECOM would want proof the technology is scalable before they commit to large orders. | flatcoat1 | |
19/9/2019 09:54 | Molatov - do you mean bounce 'to' or bounce 'too'? | axotyl | |
19/9/2019 09:49 | You can see yourself where this tends to bounce too. 125-135p region | molatovkid | |
19/9/2019 09:47 | Down the line as it's Aerospace but I thought I'd mention it as I can not see that anyone else can meet the criteria. EG just as a sample, the project in the R and D stages requires 1kg to 10kg per month capability. Then evidence already of 1 tonne to 10 tonne per year capability (it seems per potential customer). The other criteria on the GNP quality and other factors to my knowledge means only VRS can meet the requirements. The relevant name has met VRS before so there is a very high chance imo VRS are already linked up and potentially the only option for the project. It evidences interest from huge names on points of the potential industrial revolution of graphene, going into many products for 100's of different uses. Just a cog in a gear box of 100's of cogs, with a vast array of uses for the aerospace sector. | superg1 | |
19/9/2019 09:39 | Morning folks, In this article : Mr. Jay Richardson 'Fellow of the Insolvency Practitioners' Association (UK).' is new CEO | laginaneil | |
19/9/2019 09:24 | I have managed my holding down over the past 6 months. I think there is some upside but can see better profits elsewhere but SuperG did me a massive favour by banning me for some random reason a while back. I have to say some of the predictions of VRS’ potential market value over on the “ramp board” are just pie in the sky and show a complete lack of sense. That’s always a scary sign, some of these guys are gonna be disappointed and presumably will continue to hold until their assumptions are met (maybe never). | tomduck | |
19/9/2019 09:23 | Catching up Pc there is no 30 tonne production rate to be solved, 30 tonnes can be simply 10 times the modules they already have or multiples of bigger kit if those meet the standard on quality of production. The desired plan (being engineers) is a continuous process type system. | superg1 | |
19/9/2019 09:20 | Chart turning, looking very good for a bounce you are right Clint. | molatovkid | |
19/9/2019 09:19 | that would also make my day nellyb. | jointer13 | |
19/9/2019 09:11 | i just hope that the next rns drops during working hours. | nellyb | |
19/9/2019 09:10 | or it could be never | davemac3 | |
19/9/2019 09:10 | A quick review of the RNS’s from the last year is worthwhile. | johnveals | |
19/9/2019 09:07 | Lol, this is an example of a post over on the “ramp thread”, talk about not seeing the wood for the trees... “We could still get the BIGT announcement prior to or on the day of the AGM or it could be shortly after.” Ya don’t say 😉😂 | tomduck |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions