We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Versarien Plc | LSE:VRS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8YZTJ80 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.0035 | 5.26% | 0.07 | 0.065 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 44,531,183 | 09:18:54 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemicals & Chem Preps, Nec | 5.45M | -13.53M | -0.0091 | -0.08 | 989.63k |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
14/4/2019 15:18 | grabster don't want to debate hydrogen on here but Beijing have just said they want 100000 hydrogen cars on the road by 2025.both british and Chinese have cut funding for evs in favour of hydrogen.If you want more proof google austrailia usa and japan for starters although I suspect you would rather ignore and try to belittle anyone who dares say anything not positive to vrs. What happened to lucky orange by the way? | mj10 | |
14/4/2019 14:46 | The one useful part of that side was that issues around Patrick had been spotted, dicussed and thrashed to death before the bears got a sniff of it. The MMs tried to take it down but it was not news to the masses. The news was forced by the bears, with some going short prior. However it was old news to many VRS investors. Meanwhile in the months ahead Patrick is going to introduce a host of companies to VRS. If he is innocent like he comprehensively claims then he will continue on. If he isn’t he will simply be replaced. Producers can make false claims but you can’t fake performance on tests made by the customer. | superg1 | |
14/4/2019 14:17 | Fest In recent times they have you as a trader, previously part of the shorting gang and so on. I have said it before on here. I say at times you get bored/frustrated and you sound off on here. It doesn’t do any good as it helps those short and caused the headless chickens to sell. You were going to sell all at 16p and various other prices (but then buy more). I’ve known you long enough to know it’s just what you do. We are all different. I assume your contacts are the same as the ones that messaged me recently saying ‘they’ are wrong about you. Your gripes on here at times cause many to sell. For me that is just simply churn of shares held by weak holders or geared under pressure holders. Churn like that is very healthy imo. | superg1 | |
14/4/2019 14:16 | It's for the investors, they wouldn't be working if it wasn't for the people who front the cash | 1teepee | |
14/4/2019 14:15 | Is fest playing up again? So much less rude words popping up now I have him on filter | 1teepee | |
14/4/2019 14:07 | Back to VRS. Exciting times ahead, let’s hope the team can get some things over the line. Not for investors but for themselves, as they are the ones doing silly hours each day. Perhaps some of us with no experience should harass them daily and tell them how it should be done. Oh no need, a few are doing just that already😂 | superg1 | |
14/4/2019 14:03 | Fireball I stick to my morals which is about the truth and what is right. Unbeknown to me a number of investors had been picking up on that trait and since have become investing friends as they have the same morals In 10 years I’d say 5-10% on advfn are decent honest folk. They know who they are and don’t need telling, it’s just their nature to be that way. No surprise then that all of them (with businesses) are respected by their customers and valued. | superg1 | |
14/4/2019 13:49 | 1tetirement. No need, I’ve been investor friends with some on their years before VRS. Some on there are actual friends before I ever got into investing and still are. There is no need to explain anything to those guys. | superg1 | |
14/4/2019 12:57 | SG1 realistic, i know, but i hate that 'if vrs does well' ! i remember my lawyer telling me my case was a no brainer win for me in every subsequent contact she managed my expectations downward and every adjustment cost me £400 an hour of her time. i did win but she caused me a lot of angst and cost me a lot of money. | adejuk | |
14/4/2019 12:56 | Hey Guys! It's Sunday, Peace and Goodwill. I could understand some of this stuff if the share price was tanking, but it isn't! I would support Fest's belief there is a big buyer in the background as witnessed by the way the shareprice absorbed some selling last week. We still need that first big order from one of the big five. Bit like being a Game Park. You see one of them when least expecting to. All strength to NR and his team to deliver. | ridicule | |
14/4/2019 12:13 | 1retirement, no doubt we'll see some selling in the morning then, from you and other private Twitter group members who'll panic now that SuperG isn't there to hold your hands.A few cheap shares for the institutions who are serious about buying into this now.It won't make a jot of difference to the overall direction that this company is travelling in. | festario | |
14/4/2019 12:03 | Lots of potential it seems in china. Best ellis 'Commercial space sector ready for take off' Ma Si Updated: Mar 13,2019 9:27 AM "China’s commercial space sector is set for strategic growth in 2019 and more efforts are needed to promote the sustainable development of private space companies, said deputies at the two sessions. Lei Jun, chairman of Xiaomi, and a deputy to the 13th National People’s Congress, said despite being a relatively new entrant to the global commercial space arena, China has seen strong momentum in recent years with nearly 100 startups established to engage in fields such as rocket or satellite design and production. But China currently does not have a space law to ensure private companies’ rights to engage in commercial space activities. More legal efforts are needed to specify the interests of companies, Lei said The seasoned executive and angel investor also called for more policy support from the government to open the aerospace manufacturing infrastructure to private companies, in a broader push to build an ecosystem for the sustainable growth of the commercial space industry. Lei’s comments came after private space companies iSpace and One-Space last year succeeded in their respective efforts to send their designed and produced rockets into suborbital space, which is significantly lower than orbital altitudes. Another startup, LandSpace, launched its first orbital rocket carrying a small satellite in October, but the cargo did not reach its target orbit. Their pioneering efforts are attracting money from cash-rich investors. In 2018, these three rocket startups held a fundraising round, with each raising 700 million yuan ($101.95 million) to 800 million yuan. Shunwei Capital, an investment firm affiliated with Lei, has participated in the fundraising of iSpace, and other aerospace startups such as Galaxy Space and Deep Blue Aerospace. Last year also marked the first time that China had launched more rockets into orbit than any other country in a single year. China had 39 orbital launches in 2018, accounting for one-third of the world’s space missions last year. Hu Shengyun, a senior rocket designer at China Aerospace Science and Industry Corp, and a deputy to the 13th NPC, said after years of preparation and development, China’s aerospace sector is seeing more players in addition to the country’s big two State-owned tech giants CASIC and China Aerospace Science and Technology Corp." | ellissj | |
14/4/2019 11:58 | Looks quite popular imo. Best ellis 'China accepts 62 applications to be listed on new sci-tech board' Updated: Apr 11,2019 2:40 PM "BEIJING — With five more company listing applications accepted on April 10 by the Shanghai Stock Exchange, China has had 62 companies apply to be listed on the new science and technology innovation board. The companies have to go through a second stage of audit and inquiry before they can be listed on the sci-tech board. In the second stage, they mush show they comply with listing rules and that there are no flaws in their finances. Piloting a registration-based IPO system, the new sci-tech board focuses on companies in high-tech and strategically emerging sectors such as new generation information technology, advanced equipment, new materials and energy, environmental protection and biomedicine, according to the China Securities Regulatory Commission. The launch of the new board has entered a “sprint” stage, and the technical system is expected to be ready by the end of May, the exchange said earlier this year. China designed the sci-tech innovation to leverage financial reforms to boost development of high-tech sectors and advance economic transition." | ellissj | |
14/4/2019 11:51 | Chinese version of nasdaq launched per this article - new materials sector mentioned. A Potential jv route if desired i imagine ? Best ellis A Brief Introduction to the Science and Technology Innovation Board. Categories:INDUSTRY& "On March 31, 2019 Nov. 5 2018, Chinese president Xi Jinping delivered a speech a After a lot of preparation as well as the release of relevant policies and regulations, from Mar. 18 2019, Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) began to accept applications. What is the Science and Technology Innovation Board? Four years ago, the Shanghai government launched a “Strategic Emerging Board” and “Technology Innovation Board”. The two boards were originally planned to serve mid-size companies in relatively developed industries. But due to too many restrictions, the two new boards didn’t launch as planned. The Science and Technology Innovation Board is based on the two previous failed boards. This new board and the registration-based system are designed to help growth-oriented technology innovation enterprises with their finances, and hope to become the Chinese version of Nasdaq. The new board will relax company restrictions, and companies don’t need to be profitable to apply. Instead, they must have core technology or research results. This new registration-based system comes from that of Nasdaq, and security regulator only checks the legitimacy of the company, other factors such as company industry, revenue and prospects are not mandatory for applicants. Although the application threshold is low, company details must be fully disclosed so that investors can access everything they need to know about the company. This method ensures transparency, and can better help companies and protect investors. Why does China need the Science and Technology Innovation Board? The new board will enable more high-quality companies and unicorns to raise money, and help them gain more support. At the same time, this can offer more opportunities for investors and investment agencies. Who has joined the Science and Technology Innovation Board? As of today, there are already two batches of companies that have submitted applications for the IPO on the Science and Technology Innovation Board. According to the SSE website, 17 companies have been accepted thus far. The sectors of those companies include high-end equipment, bio-medicine, new material, new energy and information technology. Most companies come from Yangtze River Delta region and Pearl River Delta region, with prominent geographical advantages due to the advanced manufacturing industry in those regions." | ellissj | |
14/4/2019 11:48 | Oh!, 1retirement, that serial troll and general idiot, tells the who world that the private Twitter group is in disarray.Well nothing could please me more.It is obviously a nest of vipers, with a few decent people as exceptions, as evidenced by a couple on the inside there telling me that they like to slag me and other investors off.Pump and dump merchants, and self serving liars are in all walks of life, so it was inevitable that they would be lying dormant in that group.More power to SuperG if he has unearthed them, put them straight and walked away.Serves you all right for hiding under what you thought was a cloak of secrecy.Everything out in the open and transparent, that's what I say! | festario | |
14/4/2019 11:31 | The only objective woody is to call out those with an agenda. There are a host of seriously solid, pleasant folk behind the scenes, some of whom never post or read here. The long term plan is to engage with that group behind the scenes in a much more honest and serene environment. If VRS does well (I strongly suspect it will), then those good guys will prosper. None of them need their hands holding, they all make their own investment decisions. | superg1 | |
14/4/2019 10:55 | superg, I appreciate that your intentions are well meaning and said to protect others and I sincerely hope that you achieve your objectives. | woodpeckers | |
14/4/2019 10:17 | ‘The only thing more important to a con artist than perfecting a con is perfecting a total lack of conscience.’ | superg1 | |
14/4/2019 10:16 | I agree woody but it does get a tad frustrating to watch some fall for the same tricks over and over again. Then those that orchestrate it play the victim, which again many fall for. Decades of watching masses of what seem like intelligent folk, fall for it is frustrating. It’s only because I care. There, there, never mind doesn’t cut it in the learning from experience process. | superg1 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions