![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Versarien Plc | LSE:VRS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8YZTJ80 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.005 | 6.45% | 0.0825 | 0.075 | 0.0882 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 5,310,400 | 16:35:13 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemicals & Chem Preps, Nec | 5.45M | -13.53M | -0.0091 | -0.10 | 1.15M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
06/11/2018 15:20 | Ratpat - just filter the log. | ![]() cheek212 | |
06/11/2018 15:20 | Hello Folks, Good day to you all, well the 'sane' ones ! A few thoughts: 1. Could this Mid term election thing in USA be having an effect today ? 2. Any clues on what day interims out? I thought this week. Has anyone asked Neill? 3. Interesting that it took 3 VRS team members to sign that China document. I guess it shows how important they think it is. 4. Any idea / clues as to who the Skype call was with. That must have been important to miss his Spain trip. To any LTHs that the noise on here worries - Filter, filter, filter ! Blue Sky here today.. | ![]() laginaneil | |
06/11/2018 15:19 | Serratia, good post. I was thinking along similar, less erudite lines. So what if Ford is incorporating inferior graph-whatever in sound/heat reduction lagging? This isn’t our chosen (top end) market. Likewise mining bucket linings, I don’t recall Neill mentioning either of these on his list of market disrupting opportunities. | hoverflyman | |
06/11/2018 15:19 | Ratpat, seriously, pack that in!Our ceo reads this thread, just how much of his time do YOU want to waste? | ![]() festario | |
06/11/2018 15:18 | For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple. | ![]() ratpat999 | |
06/11/2018 15:18 | For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple. | ![]() ratpat999 | |
06/11/2018 15:18 | For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple. | ![]() ratpat999 | |
06/11/2018 15:18 | For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple. | ![]() ratpat999 | |
06/11/2018 15:18 | For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple. | ![]() ratpat999 | |
06/11/2018 15:17 | For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple. | ![]() ratpat999 | |
06/11/2018 15:17 | For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple. | ![]() ratpat999 | |
06/11/2018 15:17 | For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple. | ![]() ratpat999 | |
06/11/2018 15:15 | @HK lol I had a check of the report. You've no way to know that XGS didn't chose to split their resources this way. You seem to totally miss the point anyway. Why pay 9x as much for VRS than XGS? Showing that XGS have become more focussed doesn't justify this at all. | ![]() loglorry1 | |
06/11/2018 15:04 | ratpat, are you going for the November badge :) | ![]() bootie64 | |
06/11/2018 15:04 | richard, at least he's gone for a while to sift through the quarterly report. you should be grateful for the peace and quiet. :) H | ![]() herschel k | |
06/11/2018 15:03 | Lots of large late reported sells today, most of them wrongly showing as buys. Someone seems to have been spooked into selling. | ![]() owenga | |
06/11/2018 15:02 | This bb is a P.O.S now sadly, why anyone answers the guys who just set out to annoy or who are morons I have no idea. | ![]() richardc77 | |
06/11/2018 15:01 | It’s worth noting that there has been a major correction in markets since the 145 pence placing. Before anyone says the markets have recovered better than VRS, it is normal after a correction for cash to recycle back into the dividend paying blue chips at lower prices rather than AIM stocks. | ![]() luminoso | |
06/11/2018 15:00 | I'm going to have to start using the filter, this BB has become to painful even to skim through. Rat and Log get 1st honours. | ![]() poombear | |
06/11/2018 14:54 | loglorry 16 Nov '18 - 14:50 - 46099 of 46100 0 0 1 @HK you are making stuff up again. You can't provide evidence of this. -------------------- download their quarterly report before you accuse me. I just told you, I'm not doing the legwork for you. | ![]() herschel k | |
06/11/2018 14:54 | Unfortunately, XG Sciences is a privately-owned American company, so there is no share price chart for us to see how it is doing. | iambix | |
06/11/2018 14:52 | anley, you have a message. | ![]() luckyorange | |
06/11/2018 14:50 | @HK you are making stuff up again. You can't provide evidence of this. | ![]() loglorry1 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions