Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[ratpat999] 06/11/2018 14:50

Every time loglorry posts lies

[herschel k] 06/11/2018 14:46

are you going to just post that over and over again ratpat?

[ratpat999] 06/11/2018 14:45

For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple.

[ratpat999] 06/11/2018 14:45

For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple.

[ratpat999] 06/11/2018 14:45

For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple.

[ratpat999] 06/11/2018 14:45

For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple.

[ratpat999] 06/11/2018 14:45

For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple.

[ratpat999] 06/11/2018 14:45

For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple.

[ratpat999] 06/11/2018 14:45

For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple.

[herschel k] 06/11/2018 14:45

"Can you show me some evidence of this claim or are you just making it up?"

shows how 'well-researched' you are Tim - it's clear as day in their quarterly report.

I'm not doing the legwork for you.

[ratpat999] 06/11/2018 14:45

For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple.

[ratpat999] 06/11/2018 14:44

For newcomers to this thread/bulletin board, it's worth repeating this 30th October 2018 post by Spike: Fact Between noon today (30th October) and noon a week ago (23rd October), there have been 1,706 posts on this thread. Between them Spid81 and loglorry accounted for 161 (nearly 10%), 23 per day on average. HOWEVER neither of them are invested in VRS, and neither of them believe that VRS is a good investment, indeed they spend a considerable part of their waking hours rubbishing VRS using lies, half truths and twisted and incomplete data to make VRS as unattractive an investment as they possibly can. WHY would the want to do that. The answer is very simple - they are shorting VRS and are desperate to try to get the price down before news such as China catapults the price up over £2, and quite possibly bankrupts them. Reading their posts can damage your wealth. - it is really that simple.

[melf] 06/11/2018 14:42

You should have seen yesterday's Zoos!

[anley] 06/11/2018 14:42

hxxps://www.idtechex.com/usa2018/show/en/

[loglorry1] 06/11/2018 14:39

"Who is the cornerstone investor please?"

That was just another made up statement by @SuperG. I don't think there is such a thing. There has been no notification to that effect.

EDIT this probably deserves more explanation...

NR hasn't said who the cornerstone investor was in the £1.45p placing and there has certainly been no notifiable holding. In my experience, cornerstone investors, in highly discounted placings, in retail driven stocks like VRS are often bucket shops, who flip stock to clients on their books. In some cases, it can be an institution who has (legally) forward sold the stock into liquidity and then approached the company offering them significant funds. I've no idea if that was the case here, but it does seem odd that the £1.45p placing level has offered no support whatsoever. Evidence suggests that those who wanted to take part in the last placing did so because of the huge discount on offer, not any real belief in the company's prospects.

[loglorry1] 06/11/2018 14:38

"and they have lost a significant amount of their Chinese client base."

Can you show me some evidence of this claim or are you just making it up?

[zooskeeper] 06/11/2018 14:38

Roughly as many buys as sells & we are 10% down - not a fair playing field

[club sandwich] 06/11/2018 14:34

we don't know.

[anley] 06/11/2018 14:34

Who is the cornerstone investor please?

[herschel k] 06/11/2018 14:23

"XGS have invested heavily and they have some big clients to show for it. They are ramping up production in the hundreds of tonnes. They have literally hundreds of what VRS call collaborations."

and they have lost a significant amount of their Chinese client base.

ask yourself why.........(you won't, you'll continue to ignore it)

[axotyl] 06/11/2018 14:23

Perhaps worth mentioning that was directed at Sandwich?

[ad63] 06/11/2018 14:22

Neill Ricketts on Twitter (3h3 hours ago): so VRS have or are in the process of obtaining '...you are more than welcome to come and work for us, tie down a collaboration, negotiate your own global supply contract, int trade deal, investment, JV or licensing deal...' - tick tock the shorters clock.

[grabster] 06/11/2018 14:19

Ford's limited deal with XGS is ditchable if/when Ford find summat better. And it's not as if Ford don't make mistakes. Bigger companies often make bigger mistakes, and Ford have done so a few times over the years. I am old enough to remember one of their most famous ones - the Edsel - which has gone down in history as an example of how the bigger the company the bigger the possible error of judgment going unchallenged by those involved. Discontinued as a horrendous failure within 2 years of launch. Ford's misjudgment incurred a loss equivalent to around $2.4 billion in today's money,