Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[poombear] 24/10/2018 10:21

300+ posts since I last looked in, I'm going to take the small risk that there will not be a single revelation amongst them and click on the recent button.

[festario] 24/10/2018 10:18

Silence Sandwich... or risk the wrath of the G man, and the awesome power of his filter button. Behold!

[superg1] 24/10/2018 10:17

As I said he is a lying crook posting false information regularly so don't trust a word the guy says.

[loglorry1] 24/10/2018 10:16

It is very important to stress the omission in the V5 document of average lateral size. Here are the tables again.

V4:


V5:


It is technically now possible that 99.99% of the flakes are at the lower end e.g. 0.1um because no average size is now given. I'm not claiming that is the case but it is mathematically possible. Under V4 an average size was given of 2um so we could be reasonably confident that not many flakes were very small lateral sized.

Don't forget these numbers are all from their own website.

[anley] 24/10/2018 10:15

I am not sure what LogLorry is trying to tell us but how do we know what he has just published is true?

[p@] 24/10/2018 10:13

Well looks like shorts closing today,those ii's want them back?

[club sandwich] 24/10/2018 10:13

Not exactly bouncing back strongly, is it?

"he has the power, if he chose to use it, to kill you... bring you back to life... and kill you again and again"

but not the power to accurately predict when news will arrive...

[loglorry1] 24/10/2018 10:11

If anyone feels they want an answer when reading the comments of our resident criminal then just ask.

Just like to point out that calling me a criminal when I have no criminal record is defamation. Sorry forgot its ok to defame a bear but not a bull. Phew that's all right then.

[anotherdrink] 24/10/2018 10:11

NR on Twitter: 'I am not worried about the price , it will sort itself out. I have bigger things to worry about #inagoodway' - :)

[festario] 24/10/2018 10:11

Kempster! You will bow before the mighty SuperG.He does not make death threats, he has the power, if he chose to use it, to kill you... bring you back to life... and kill you again and again.

[superg1] 24/10/2018 10:08

BTW my comments come direct from VRS I have discussed scale up potential many times.

There was no need to mention it.

If anyone feels they want an answer when reading the comments of our resident criminal then just ask.

[festario] 24/10/2018 10:07

Nice one O mighty SuperG, (all praise him)

[loglorry1] 24/10/2018 10:07

On scale up better quality is being achieved ask NR yourself so good news, Nanene just gets better and better.

SuperG - THIS IS YOUR RESPONSE! NR told you it gets better and better so stuff the numbers and data. I'm sorry but you are coming across a bit naive.

I've posted documented proof of my statement as asked with source references from Versarien's Nanene site and from well respected scientific papers.

Stick to posting stories of death threats maybe?

[serratia] 24/10/2018 10:06

A comment or two on concrete -

Concrete degrades due a number of reasons, firstly ingress of chloride ions (salt) react with the steel reinforcements degrading the steel, concrete cracking and loss of bonding between the aggregate/hydrated cement paste.
A second reason is microbial attack. There are microbes that can use sulphate as an energy source. The microbes end up releasing sulphuric acid inside the concrete which again weakens the structure.
Graphene has two benefits maybe more in concrete use. Firstly there is a strength increase which would reduce the quantity of concrete required by up to 50%. Secondly Graphene acts as a moisture barrier so chloride penetration would be inhibited and the microbes that produces the acids need water to grow.
So when you drive down the motorway and see lumps of concrete have come off on bridges yes something might have hit it but also think Thiobacillus share price are living there producing small quantities of sulphuric acid.

A third possible application could be the use of the electrical conductivity. If you use Graphene containing cement you might be able to check for structural integrity by passing a current through the structure. Any cracks should result in a variation in the current passing through the concrete. This part is speculation on my part as I've not seen any research papers on Graphene concrete electrical conductivity.
I also haven't looked yet to see whether there is a benefit in using few layer Graphene. I can think of possible reasons why there could be a benefit but I'll have to do a search. Would concrete would stand the cost of FLG ? I'll need to run some figures.

[festario] 24/10/2018 10:06

DgDuncan... Bell end though Kempster is, I respect that he came back with the data he promised. But, does it actually show that Nanene scale up in size causes instability? I wouldn't know. I do know however that it deserves scrutiny and firm rebuttal if not.

[jointer13] 24/10/2018 10:05

neill.

"wholly untrue."

[superg1] 24/10/2018 10:03

Fest

I looked it up.

Already covered that but no need to mention it but obvious there is now.

On scale up better quality is being achieved ask NR yourself so good news, Nanene just gets better and better.

The sheet shown is simply a range change from 500nm to 10,000 nm to 100nm to 10,000 nm.

Probably in the interest of accuracy.

As we all know VRS are constantly trying to upgrade and improve things and it's going well.

[dgduncan] 24/10/2018 10:02

Fes - what was Loglorry's hypothesis. I have him filtered but had a look at his posts and don't see much of interest. Did he try to state some fact for a change ?.