![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Uk Oil & Gas Plc | LSE:UKOG | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BS3D4G58 | ORD GBP0.000001 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00025 | 1.75% | 0.0145 | 0.014 | 0.015 | 0.0145 | 0.01425 | 0.01 | 64,791,793 | 13:27:15 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finance Services | 1.54M | -3.78M | -0.0005 | -0.20 | 1.16M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
18/10/2016 22:48 | lenigas getting excited about brockham...good job im in ALBA | temmujin | |
18/10/2016 21:33 | Markwell's Woods planningpublicaccess Portsmouth Water Response Thank you for consulting Portsmouth Water on this planning application for the continued development of the oil and gas site at Markwell’s Wood. Based on the groundwater sensitivity and the nature of the proposed works, Portsmouth Water would object to this application until the Groundwater Risk Assessment and Environmental Statement (Section 9.0 - Ground Condition & Groundwater) are revised to include the information below, at which point the company will review its position. Portsmouth Water is concerned that the application in its current format does not identify all potentially significant effects that the proposed works may have on groundwater or, how adverse effects will be mitigated. No site specific data is incorporated in the risk assessment and there have been limited attempts to present the catchment dynamics within the Source Protection Zone 2 of the Havant and Bedhampton Springs. If the Havant and Bedhampton Springs public water supply source is impacted as a result of this application there would be significant effects on the population of the City of Portsmouth and surrounding area. Another 4 pages if you want to read it all. Can see this one going backwards and forwards for a bit IMO. | beebong1 | |
18/10/2016 21:09 | "and c£6k profit on Alba's move today on my holding is hardly tedious" Looks like we will have to add Melton Mowbray to your list of nicknames. They do make pork pies don't they? you don't have that many shares IMO, just lots of unsubstantiated trades. You really are a sad individual if everyone who has an alternative view to you is as you say. I would get a life and worry about your own investments as you must be well down here at the moment. More lies from you. I think I made 3 posts on ALBA yesterday to your 15. Sounds like you are breaking your bashers rules yet again. Lesson 3: BASHERS POST MANY TIMES A DAY. They try to wear you out. They comment on everything, every other post, and can answer every question. THEY KNOW IT ALL! There is no positive comment they won't Bash. They try to control the board. True longs may have to confront the Bashers or they will appear to the newbies as being the people with all the information. This is best accomplished by posting positive, well researched data on the company, repetitively, while trying hard not to engage the Bashers in direct repartee. I'm still waiting for links to Brockham EA and planning applications which you say have been made. It really is bad form to mislead other PI's for your own advantage. No doubt you never will as you never reply to anything that you don't know the answer to. | beebong1 | |
18/10/2016 18:43 | ps Mept and Tellurian's merger should completed by Q4 2016, and their 35% HH interest is up for grabs according to their recent SEC filings.....watch this space gl ;-) | ![]() moneymunch | |
18/10/2016 17:49 | Fair enough and thanks, but what happens with Alba at Brockham is highly relevant to Ukog, and beewrong, who's followed me to the Alba thread and his scumbag mate frjdnverijtnhj856893 | ![]() moneymunch | |
18/10/2016 17:38 | thought we were on the UKOG thread?? which has been tedious, no? nice profits elsewhere, well done. gl. | ![]() west4 | |
18/10/2016 16:13 | Unlike your input pest4, unless you're talking about the jet setter beewrong, who spends all his valuable time trying to undermine and deter where he's not invested.....and c£6k profit on Alba's move today on my holding is hardly tedious. Gla holders :-) | ![]() moneymunch | |
18/10/2016 15:10 | Alba moving up....they don't like it up 'em, do they beewrong, (aka around the world in 80 seconds)...pmsl....: | ![]() moneymunch | |
18/10/2016 13:45 | been told brockham news imminent...get in my son! | temmujin | |
18/10/2016 11:06 | I for one am getting rather fed up with the incessant ramping by one poster on here. Either post the links to the planning permission and request for EA permits for Brockham or shut the F up! Clue. Brockham has only one permit and that is for Industrial Installations from 2013. PS I know where the 2014 planning application is ;o) You won't post it even if you do know where it is as it is not good news and you are not allowed to post bad news or the sheriffs will jump all over you. | beebong1 | |
18/10/2016 11:06 | Funny ha ha. And this is from someone who should know better! "HHDL and the Company's Interest in the Licence HHDL is a special purpose vehicle, which owns a 65% working interest and operatorship of the Licence. UKOG now owns a 10% beneficial shareholding in HHDL. The directors of the Company accept responsibility for the contents of this announcement." | beebong1 | |
18/10/2016 06:43 | David Lenigas @DavidLenigas 9h9 hours ago People who think I am just playing with the Brockham new oil well. Think again at your own risk! Fact. @DoriemusPlc excited. | ![]() moneymunch | |
17/10/2016 18:56 | Fair comment Money!! | ![]() mikeygit | |
17/10/2016 17:57 | What sort of time scale are we thinking | ![]() kenbos | |
17/10/2016 17:54 | ps Mikey, it's worth posting the Rns or other published information on the thread, because you can then easily search back for information when required from the "search this thread" box, top left above the charts......if a link only is posted, then no information can be retrieved, it also allows the lazy to read at will and forces some humble pie down the basher's throats.... Gl ;-) | ![]() moneymunch | |
17/10/2016 17:45 | The following suggests that Angus Energy has already obtained full permit approval, presuming that the "mining waste permit" from the EA was dealt with at that time.......we know that Angus decided to put the sidetrack on hold with the collapse in oil prices shortly after. Gla...Brockham's sidetrack imminent as per several statements from Ukog, Alba and Dor that Angus expects the sidetrack to be underway this year. ;-) 16th May 2014 Brockham Oil Field (10% owned by DOR and operated by Angus Energy): The Brockham Oil Field ("Brockham"), in the Weald Basin, is held under United Kingdom Production Licence PL 235. Oil production was recently increased from 42 bopd to 84 bopd after a successful work-over programme in January 2014 and production has only slightly tapered off to its current levels of about 66 bopd. Brockham's 28 API oil is regularly trucked and sold to the Perenco Refinery. The planned 450 metre side-track well at Brockham, designed to increase overall production from the Field, as previously announced on 25 April 2014, has been temporarily delayed by up to 13 weeks due to the UK Environmental Agency having recently requested that the operator Angus Energy must apply for a new mining waste permit. The Operator is currently attending to obtaining this additional permit. and further confirmation 26th June 2015 The planned new side-track infill production well at Brockham has been engineered and designed and is a major element of a revised Field Development Plan submitted to, and accepted by, the Oil and Gas Authority ("OGA"). The Field Development Plan includes the proposed side-track, with the target of increasing production by 150 bopd (gross) and accessing similar recoverable volumes as the existing producing well. | ![]() moneymunch | |
17/10/2016 16:16 | harrissen---it was in response to Funkmasters post about Planning---please keep up!! | ![]() mikeygit | |
17/10/2016 15:20 | So what was the point of your post? | harrissen | |
17/10/2016 12:44 | Parish council?! Didn't you know, they have no power whatsoever. Anything important and they get no say. | ![]() rayrac | |
17/10/2016 12:34 | SS lives in a nice rural area similar to HH so IMO he has taken into account local views. "In order to minimise impact to the locality, feedback from both a public consultation and engagement process, undertaken in July, and subsequent meetings with local residents' representatives, was incorporated into the envisaged development design and planning application." The year PFT is now going to be a 4-6 month ept. The actual planning application will tell but I don't see them working 24/7 either. Or in other words, don't P off the neighbours! | beebong1 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions