Tomco Energy Share Discussion Threads

[thesageofsaint] 28/4/2021 12:28

Sorry Shaun, forgot to mention you, but you are easily missed!

[damac] 28/4/2021 12:26

Wow... 2 posters disprove of me telling Goulding he has an email from me..... how sad of them. Still, you know they are hurting when they act like that, which is nice.

[damac] 28/4/2021 12:15

Goulding, I've just replied to your email.

[goulding1215] 28/4/2021 12:05

I see QFI up 15.6% today, after yesterday’s rise, based on their review of the short TOM rns by the TOM board. TOM down 6%. Must be a great buy at this price. Perhaps 1 of our 3 NEDS, could start buying.

[beetroot juice] 28/4/2021 11:08

Damac thinks he is in the Know:) What a Turkey. Brains of a Baboon. BUT back to Tomco.

Where is the pictorial or Video evidence of a Machine being loaded with Sand and Oil coming out of its other end?

Show this and I will happily say I am a Moron and fool. That I am Wrong.

BUT I am not wrong.. Its why you will Never see this, the likes of Damac and Fish man are part albeit very low level members of the Cult. Gives them a sense of belonging and being one of the Special ones.

Trust neither of them. By the way you are aware that Potter posts on here.. Are you not?

Take a guess who he is?:) I will tell you later.

[goulding1215] 28/4/2021 10:54

As usual fishy and Damac filling in the gaps left by the company. Thank you.

Good post by rmart as well, showing the company lacks in info.

[rmart] 28/4/2021 10:51

damac, if you are right then fair enough, but it has been a very long time coming.

If it is working then lets have a tweet TODAY showing it. It takes a few seconds.

[fishyneck] 28/4/2021 09:55

Goulding, I don't know too much about QFI's business model but it looks like they have spent many months/years in the doldrums and due to project progress are starting to improve. Well done to any holders over there. When the time is right Tomco will be able to issue the positive news that will bring our share price out of the doldrums too. I believe we are close to that milestone.

I personally thank John deserves credit for our involvement with Valkor/greenfield. You could argue that the failure of the RF project opened the door to the Valkor relationship and the subsequent better opportunity we now have. Putting it purely down to luck is maybe a little lazy.

fn

[goulding1215] 28/4/2021 09:45

Yes, you are correct fishy, in the future success of TOMCO. However it is because of Greenfield, which has a successful business man and engineering company behind him. TOM have been lucky to be in Greenfield. Nor does it make it all right to receive skimpy rns’, no updates between rns’. Shareholders should be kept informed of progress of the Development at all times, which is a FCA requirement. You don’t need to write rns’s all the time which cost money, it can be tweeted to reassure shareholders and prevent selling for lack of news. That is not price sensitive. Just look at QFI’s professional rns from a professional BOD. Nor does the Greenfield excuse TOM having and paying for 3 NED’s who contribute nothing to the company. The latest rns proves my point. I am writing in a negative fashion only in a positive way for the company to improve its performance through a change in the current BOD. Aimho

[beetroot juice] 28/4/2021 09:38

Nice to See Stuart Little go home crying after a little Medicine called a reality check got taken.

All AIM companies at their core are Dross, some just total DROSS. Tomco is of the latter.

These 5 so called Directors are journeymen, that roam around AIM, getting appointments to take a salary and promote fantastical tales of Sand in Rock in Tomcos case, or Diamonds in Botswana, or Oil in Namibia, or Copper in Uzbekistan in other cases.

Never anywhere one can visit to see, because if you went to any of these places you would see? NOTHING

Its Why this motley crew of Low Level, Suit Wearing, Aim Directors never buy stock in these supposed companies that are about to hit the big time and make MUG PUNTERS rich.. Because said companies are Paper Tigers.

Ie their activities existing on RNS documents only.. Sad but True.

Take Note and trade accordingly or lose all your money, if you fall in love or get greedy..Like Err Damac the Fool and Stuart Little The Baby.

[oil be there] 28/4/2021 09:15

Great post Fishy.

[fishyneck] 28/4/2021 09:12

15 posts this morning, 12 from annoyed former holders and disgruntled current holders having a dig at the company and contributors on here. This has been the pattern for months now. Nobody can convince me this thread is portraying anything like a balanced argument on Tomcos prospects going forward.

Well done SL for lasting so long, I gave up trying to have sensible discussion on here about the pros and cons of Tomco many months ago. Maybe I'm a snowflake too :-)

As a long term shareholder I am well aware of the history, the dilution, the past failings. When the Greenfield project was brought to the table I had a decision to make to continue to support the company in this new venture or walk away. I fully understand the risk of the project, as I do with all my AIM holdings, but my research leads me to believe there is a strong chance of success here and on that basis I am happy to be invested here. So while I keep in mind the history of the company that, in my mind, does not guarantee failure going forward, as some would like us to believe.