We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theracryf Plc | LSE:TCF | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BSVYN304 | ORD 0.25P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.625 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.625 | 0.625 | 0.63 | 15,411 | 07:48:07 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 396k | -3.14M | -0.0073 | -1.10 | 2.67M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
13/4/2015 18:49 | Skyship thanks for the reply. I am serious. I don't entirely see why the Nav of a building need necessarily change when let. Surely for almost all building s if you drop the rent enough they will be let. That being basis on which they should be valued... Also over at IERE unlet buildings have been sold at 50% discounts to Nav why would this be the case if the Nav was remotely accurate... I really want to understand this better think it is time to read some surveying books... I know prop cos provide detail but if I can't model Nav effect no real use to me... I am often concerned NAV doesnt reflect likely open market sale value... | rjmahan | |
13/4/2015 08:27 | rymahan was yr question to edwardt genuine? Of course a lease extension can give rise to an asset revaluation. # A building with no tenant - a void - could be valued at x # That building with a small company tenant could be valued at x +15% # That building with a blue chip covenant tenant could be valued at x +25% # All valuations take regard to lease length - a short lease could lead to a void! This is why propco Annual Reports always provide extensive detail on leases and covenants... I am not aware of an available detailed guide to Surveyors valuation techniques. | skyship | |
09/4/2015 15:46 | Edwardt why would a lease extension move Nav surely value of assets is the same... Do you have any guide as to the theory of how NAV is calculated? | rjmahan | |
08/4/2015 17:10 | surely the idea here is is to extend leases - get circa 20% nav uplift (conservatively) and then sell. on current share price , we could make 1.5 times our money? easy! | edwardt | |
31/12/2014 17:51 | Sales + Low liquidity. If you read report TCF wont be able to pay out for several years (I estimate 4) unless sold. However after 4 years I recon this can have a 10% yield. | rjmahan | |
23/12/2014 18:00 | Curious price weakness. results and investment environment look ok IMHO | praipus | |
15/9/2014 22:06 | Praipus - they arent redeeming £2 a share as they can't - its is locked up in Italian telephone exchanges. They are looking to realize - but it will take a while. They are simply returning cash. | rjmahan | |
11/9/2014 21:12 | Correction I meant: will we see the theoretical NAV rise 12.42p after redemption? | praipus | |
11/9/2014 14:07 | NAV £2.01 x 1,000 shares = £2,010 Redeem 119 at £1.09 = Cash £129.71 Remaining 881 shares at £2.01 = £1,770.81 + Cash £129.71 = £1,900.521 Difference £109.48 presumably this accrues to the remaining NAV? So will we see the share price rise by 12.42p after redemption? | praipus | |
11/9/2014 09:36 | hi rjmahan, a question If the NAV is really £2 why are they only redeeming £1 per share? | praipus | |
10/9/2014 23:37 | Glad I held mine - always think when they redeem - should buy more but never do - spread is too big now... | rjmahan | |
22/8/2014 19:13 | The valuation of the underlying properties hasn't really changed. It's just how they have accounted for the investment. A big discount is warranted as they can't sell the Italian properties and they don't generate much cash. At least they sorted the tax issue. Must be quite a de-listing risk though in my view, so be careful if you wish to get out anytime soon. I still have a few Value Catalyst and that's been a slow and declining value scenario. | topvest | |
22/8/2014 19:02 | See what you mean they went up but didn't have the discount:) | praipus | |
22/8/2014 15:10 | well worth the wait - glad i hang around. interesting also to note, despite the enormous rise in the share price, the discount has actually widened out! i can not say that has happened to me before! | edwardt | |
11/7/2013 12:45 | Yes, not impressed at all by Laxey. They moan about other organisations, but they should look at themselves. This vehicle has been a disaster, but they have increased their investment management fee from £364k to £862k in the year - what exactly do they manage...nothing much!? Director fees are £164k. Disgraceful! Value Catalyst Fund is much the same. A very slow liquidation, but Laxey still take too much. I will avoid Laxey Partners in the future! And they are happy to run campaigns against Alliance Trust - they have to be joking! | topvest | |
26/3/2013 16:59 | all quiet here - any views?? | edwardt | |
08/1/2013 16:24 | went back in on discount widening out post cash distribution. Obviously hugely linked to tax ruling on spazio and may be subject to delisting risk etc. all in , i think it is worth a punt.. | edwardt | |
08/1/2013 16:04 | Also surprised we havent seen an "ex-divi" dip. Edit ok guess we wont see one due to the nature of the return. | praipus | |
08/1/2013 15:24 | Ok can see its on its way. What was your rationale for reinvesting? | praipus |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions