Buy
Sell
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Union Jack Oil Plc LSE:UJO London Ordinary Share GB00BLH1S316 ORD 5P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -1.50 -4.96% 28.75 484,690 11:58:41
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
28.50 29.00 30.25 28.50 30.25
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Oil & Gas Producers 1.89 -0.85 -0.83 32
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
12:34:56 O 194 28.98 GBX

Union Jack Oil (UJO) Latest News

More Union Jack Oil News
Union Jack Oil Investors    Union Jack Oil Takeover Rumours

Union Jack Oil (UJO) Discussions and Chat

Union Jack Oil (UJO) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
12:34:5728.9819456.22O
12:30:1828.981,500434.70O
12:29:1628.821,500432.33O
12:24:5828.9821963.47O
12:24:3328.9815,5034,492.77O
View all Union Jack Oil trades in real-time

Union Jack Oil (UJO) Top Chat Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 28/11/2022 08:20 by Union Jack Oil Daily Update
Union Jack Oil Plc is listed in the Oil & Gas Producers sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker UJO. The last closing price for Union Jack Oil was 30.25p.
Union Jack Oil Plc has a 4 week average price of 28.50p and a 12 week average price of 25.10p.
The 1 year high share price is 53p while the 1 year low share price is currently 10.75p.
There are currently 112,865,896 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 483,618 shares. The market capitalisation of Union Jack Oil Plc is £32,731,109.84.
Posted at 27/11/2022 09:37 by ldbart
I'm not sure what the confusion over the share buy back is. It is strategic. They're working to a clever plan.I believe the plan is to underpin the share price, not spike it. UJO will buy any sellers or weakness.We get a bit of good news, price rises, sellers/traders sell. That's when UJO will be buying. Each time this happens from now on, the price foundation gets stronger, the Bid rises and there are less shares in free float.It's the news, IIs, PIs, Sentiment and the Fundamentals of the assets and potential that will rise the price, not UJO buying the shares...I think it's a good plan.
Posted at 25/11/2022 16:04 by talkman2
I’m very surprised that UJO have not made a move for EOG as it’s share price has not moved much above 1p since it’s Serenity result .

Such a t/o would nearly double UJO’s production give it access to EOG’s cash pile ( around £8.3 million at end of July ) . An offer of cash and shares valuing EOG at 2p would probably do it and put UJO on a different level . Maybe DB doesn’t want to upset Oddie at Europa but on a purely business level makes compelling sense . The market episode view it as a positive.

Posted at 22/11/2022 09:20 by maxwell
MM’s Just holding the share price down to allow “Someone or grp” to obtain a suitable holding I think & once done will up share price again. As UJO buying shares is a laugh & much better with Divi to actual shareholders who then get a return.
Posted at 14/11/2022 16:49 by ashleyjv
Union Jack Oil plc
@UnionJackOilplc
#ujo

Malcy: "the UJO share price should be substantially higher than not just today’s 34p but also the year’s high of 53p"

Posted at 24/10/2022 06:37 by ashkv
Could you please assist and clarify if I am accurate on my below cursory assessment of UJO production / current financial snapshot? Thank you

Brent: $92.50
UJO Share Price: 27p
Total Voting Rights: 112,865,896
Market Cap GBP: £30,473,792
GBPUSD: 1.135
Market Cap USD: $34,587,754
Cash (GBP): £6,503,960
Cash (USD): $7,381,995
Investments (GBP): £662,748
Investments (USD): $752,219
Receivables (GBP): £2,124,110
Receivables (USD): $2,410,865
Enterprise Value (USD): $24,042,675
UJO Current Production: 300
EV/BARREL-USD : $80,142

Posted at 24/10/2022 06:16 by cwa1
Maiden Special Dividend and share buyback announced...

https://www.investegate.co.uk/union-jack-oil-plc--ujo-/rns/maiden-special-dividend--share-buy-back-programme/202210240700067728D/

Maiden Special Dividend Declared

The Board declares a gross Maiden Special Dividend of 0.8 pence per Ordinary Share (total payment £902,927) with a London Stock Exchange Ex-Dividend date of Thursday 17 November 2022, a Record Date of Friday 18 November 2022 and Payment Date of Friday 16 December 2022.

Share Buy-back Programme

The Company will now implement a share buyback programme, funded from the Company's existing cash resources, and within the limitations of the authority granted by shareholders at the recent AGM. This will involve the purchase of Ordinary Shares in the open market, the timing of which will be dependent on market conditions, share price, trading volumes and subject to the Company's Capital Allocation and Distribution Policy criteria.

All share purchases by the Company will be announced by RNS as soon as practicable following the dealing.

The Company intends to place the repurchased Ordinary Shares into Treasury. Ordinary Shares held in Treasury are not entitled to voting rights and dividend payments, or included in the Earnings Per Share calculation.

Executive Chairman of Union Jack, David Bramhill commented: "Union Jack's financial position has been transformed during 2022 and it now has a robust balance sheet, a fully funded and active work programme for the next 18 months on its principal projects and has no borrowings. Our Capital Allocation and Distribution Policy and current excess cash position allows us to declare a Maiden Special Dividend and to implement a share buyback programme going forward, while importantly not impeding the Company's organic growth potential.

"These distributions are an important means of returning value to shareholders and signal the significant progress that Union Jack has achieved during the past year."

Posted at 21/10/2022 12:57 by mike290
Does anyone else sense that the copious negative posts on this bulletin board have prompted those who wish to drive the UJO share price down even further to act now?

If Union Jack's shares fall much further, I'll be buying the shares that I sold fairly recently, in the run up to 50p, back ;-)

Posted at 21/10/2022 09:46 by markfrankie
Redrooboo, your argument gets a bit wishy washy due to your playground childish name calling.
*IF* ujo are in a close/d period would you then atleast accept the silence? It's only been a couple of weeks since the wn cpr, give them a chance to decide on divi/bB or none just yet... as I believe they have over 12 months to decide.. I don't believe all this booing should sway the boards decisions,
As for historical events(namely the last ever placing) I totally understand your feelings on that! But in his defence he didn't know when and what wressel would flow, he didn't know if WN was going to move fast and didn't want to be caught with his trousers down for funds, As for the royalty The jury's out But totally understand all the concerns vented! And he did listen and stop before proceeding with the 2nd,
David and team have built a really good portfolio, yes the share price is laughable, you can Not blame him for project timescales; Ujo are not the operators

Posted at 21/10/2022 07:55 by likeawalrus
...this was posted on the RBD bb, a very interesting read


For those who don’t subscribe to toms blog
The full article it looks spot on.

Reabold Resources (RBD) now faces a sack the board resolution spearheaded by Donegal’s finest Cathal Friel. Friel has, in various share issuances, poured vast amounts of Euro into the company. He has skin in the game and he and fellow shareholders owning 6.93% collectively want change. They have had enough of failure being rewarded. As you can see HERE, we have exposed the charlatans who run this company before. And in response to the resolution, the charlatans are playing fast and lose with the truth once more. They say:

This is an ”opportunistic attempt to gain control without paying a control premium”. That is just a lie. All that the requisitioners wish to do is replace a failed board that has destroyed both shareholder value and the share price with a new board, including Cathal, with new ideas to, we hope, deliver better outcomes. Cathal has a track record as a value creator. The current board has a track record as a value destroyer. So it is simple we back Cathal, sack the board.

So how does Cathal see it. He has been in touch and explains what is going on thus:

“I have personally invested a number of times in Reabold through Kamran Sattar of Portillion Capital. Since 2020, Kamran has been very actively involved with the management team of Reabold and in January 2021, he both corner-stoned and underwrote the placing of £7.5 million. This ensured that the placing was completed at a premium to the then market price of 0.55p avoiding shareholder dilution. Subsequently, Kamran has had significant engagement with the company including when Reabold’s share price was tumbling in Q3 2021, Kamran introduced Hannam & Partners to Reabold as he has previously worked with them, and in turn launched a strategic review of the assets with a view to monetising some of the assets. Kamran was also part of the group named as strategic investors in Corallion Energy and the party that facilitated the Day Break transaction. Kamran, myself and a number of other shareholders have become very frustrated by the really poor performance of the Reabold team despite Kamran’s best efforts and therefore, we have decided that most of the Board needs to be replaced including both co-CEOs.

As mentioned, I hold a reasonable investment in Reabold, where I am nursing a substantial loss. I am fully aware that the markets are currently difficult with most stocks down in 2022. Despite this, I have joined this Requisition because I feel quite strongly that Reabold should have been able to perform vastly better than many of its peers in the Oil & Gas sector.

Furthermore, whilst the requisitioning shareholders calling the general meeting account for 6.93% of the voting rights in Reabold, this is simply for the purpose of expediency. A 5% holding is the minimum requirement under company law to requisition a meeting and we brought together a close, small group of initial shareholders for this purpose. Notwithstanding this, please be aware that we have significant support amongst the shareholder base, which we estimate currently accounts for more than 25% of the total voting rights. When it comes to the voting process, the requisitioning shareholders are optimistic in being able to persuade and convince most of the other shareholders to support the Requisition.

Reabold was marketed as an innovative company taking a fresh approach to how AIM listed Oil & Gas companies should operate. As someone with extensive experience managing and investing in AIM listed companies, I was attracted by their purported fresh approach. However, I am really struggling to see how the existing team is implementing this fresh approach when you consider the following:

How can a small cap publicly quoted company such as Reabold justify having a dual CEO function? In 2021, both CEOs received a base salary of £231,000, representing a combined salary for the CEO function of £462,000. This is significantly out of line with the AIM market for a company with such a small market cap;

In addition to their base salary, both CEOs received a bonus of £50,000 and share based payments worth £66,000 during 2021, bringing their total remuneration package, including pension contributions, to £358,000 each despite the share price dropping significantly from 0.64p to 0.17p (a decline of over 70%) in the calendar year of 2021;

Both CEOs, Sachin Oza and Stephen Williams, have significant conflicts of interest, holding board positions in associated companies and drawing an income from these roles in addition to the substantial packages they are currently drawing from Reabold. Both are non-executive directors of Rathlin Energy Limited. Stephen is also a non-executive director at Europa Oil and Gas plc. Sachin Oza is also a non-executive director of Corallian Energy;

Additionally, given the recent sale process, the Corallian directors will be issued significant incentive bonuses. This significantly reduces the size of the cash that will be distributed to the Reabold shareholders. This incentive structure brings about inherent conflicts of interest questions, most notably the potential for the Directors to be more focussed on maximising their bonuses rather than representing the best interests of shareholders.

In my opinion, across several recent deals and transactions involving Reabold, a more experienced, seasoned and hands-on Board would have produced a much better result for shareholders. Clear examples of the inability of the Board to maximise shareholder value include:

The conditional sale of Corallian Energy is significantly lower than expected and guided by the management team. It was previously stated by that Corallian's updated 2C economic valuation of Victory, based on an historical average gas price valuation of 50p/therm, had increased from £146 million to £193 million yet the sale price is just £32 million;

The return for Reabold shareholders, even with the £32 million sale is vastly diluted by what the board are receiving and the payment of their incentive shares;

The lacklustre results of UK onshore licence PEDL 183;

The Board having failed to capitalise on the downtrend trend in oil prices last year to acquire producing assets to secure the future of the business.

The parties supporting this requisition are long term shareholders of Reabold who have invested significant cash resources to cornerstone and support a number of Reabold’s placings. This is in stark contrast to the Board who collectively own just over 3%, and who’s compensation has minimal correlation to Reabold’s overall performance, specifically share price performance.

The parties supporting this Requisition have a clear vision and plan on how to get Reabold performing properly in the UK Oil & Gas sector. Market conditions in 2021 and 2022 should have allowed any UK Oil & Gas focused company such as Reabold to significantly outperform their peers. Whereas the reality is, Reabold has completely underperformed.

I lay the blame for this mismanagement at the foot of the Board. This assessment is clearly reciprocated by the market through the significant decline in the share price. As with any company which has disappointed and whose Board has been in place for 4-5 years, it is my view that a fresh start is necessary. A fresh set of eyes and a more hands-on approach from seasoned veterans such as myself and John McGoldrick is required. We both have considerably more experience operating and turning around struggling public companies than Reabold’s existing Board, and we are relishing the opportunity to implement significant improvements to Reabold. These improvements are under the following areas:

Return cash to shareholders;

Appoint an appropriate and experienced CEO; we are in discussions with two appropriate candidates;

Realise substantially higher value from existing projects; and

Capitalise on several new asset deals, which will involve no dilution of equity for the shareholders.

It is very important to note that although my more recent experience has been focused on life sciences, I have considerable experience in the Oil & Gas space, both operating and investing in publicly listed companies:

I had a ringside seat with Cove Energy plc, from its formation in 2009 when it had an initial market cap of less than £1 million through to its ultimate trade sale 3 years later in 2012 for c. £1.7 billion. I shared a small office in Dublin with the founders and I became quite close to the management team as it evolved very rapidly, providing support to them as they became one of the most successful AIM oil and gas investments in many years;

As a result, the Cove Energy founders helped me establish Fastnet Oil and Gas plc which IPO’d on AIM in 2011. As with all my public company projects, I invested a very large part of my personal net worth to become Fastnet’s single largest investor. While running Fastnet, I was a very hands-on Executive Chairman and for the first two years that I ran it, I took a nominal £10,000 salary per annum. Throughout my three years as Executive Chairman of Fastnet, we completed a huge amount of activity including successfully raising c. $50 million and in turn we brought in key strategic players such as BP, Kosmos Energy and SK Energy to entirely fund our Moroccan offshore well and operations. We also discovered one of the larger onshore gas resources in Morocco and did extensive work in the Celtic Sea basin;

When oil and gas prices collapsed from $120 a barrel to $30 in 2014, I immediately conserved all of the company’s cash, reduced its overheads by 95%, creating a substantial cash shell with c. $15 million and transformed Fastnet into Amryt Pharma plc which today is listed on Nasdaq with a market cap of c. $500 million;

I have been a reasonably substantial investor in several other Oil & Gas companies, some of which have worked out well for me. I was an early investor in Rockrose Energy plc and stayed in until its successful trade sale. Likewise, I was a substantial, early investor in Touchstone Exploration plc, which also resulted in excellent returns on my initial investment.

I have also invested in a range of other oil and gas companies, some of which have performed well and others of which have performed rather badly. As such, I believe I have a clear insight into how a successful AIM listed Oil & Gas management team should operate to deliver successful outcomes for its shareholders.

I see striking similarities in the current situation with Reabold to what I faced when I first met with hVIVO plc’s Board in October 2019. hVIVO at that point in time also had a very expensive dual management team structure. This included a very expensive Executive Chairman and COO, both of whom claimed they were running the company and were extracting significant remuneration packages while the market cap of hVIVO was less than £10 million, the company was perennially loss making and moving towards the point of insolvency.

I promptly replaced these very expensive executives and consolidated their dual role into a single position, on a modest package that was less than what either of the predecessors was on. I am a firm believer that the Board should reflect the values of the business while focusing on delivering sustainable returns for the company’s shareholders. As such, I am confident that the Requisition can be the catalyst to transform Reabold in a similar manner to how we transformed hVIVO, more than doubling revenues to c.£50 million in 3 years while most importantly being on target to make substantial real profits for the first time in hVIVO’s history this year.

A key pillar to this success has been a relentless focus on cost management, particularly minimising inefficient and ineffective C-suite executive packages. This is a principle I believe is crucial for any small cap public company to survive.

Ends.

Posted at 20/10/2022 17:48 by lageraemia
I would venture that given how impossible it has proven to keep news of a placing even remotely under wraps in the past, it make the chances of any corporate action (M or A) utterly impossible to keep secure.

I wonder if the recent halving in the share price has has been because UJo are eyeing up an acquisition? If the share price of another company has got up recently, I'd be more strongly suspecting it.

It's all just theft in the end. Insider trading is a criminal activity.

The company needs to announce a move to the main list ASAP.

Having said that, I would now be open to the concept a shareholder action group and discuss it in detail.

Union Jack Oil share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
LSE
UJO
Union Jack..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

Log in to ADVFN
Register Now

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20221128 12:53:53