Strat Aero Share Discussion Threads

[andy] 10/11/2016 17:36

bygdennis,

Is this true, YOU have been "rewriting" RNS?

Who would have believed it!

A phrase about pots and kettles springs to mind!

[yorgi] 10/11/2016 17:10

Thanks Bygdennis. There is a lot of interesting information on that site and it only goes to reinforce what the potential is for this market but whether we can take a share of it still remains to be seen. It is down to the BOD to now deliver the contracts which will determine AERO's future.

It is disappointing to see the lack of interest in AERO now although to some extent it is understandable.

Apart from one or two lurkers it is purely TW and his lackys posting under a number of different usernames, easy to see through and Andy who spends nearly all his time looking for a company with a fallen share price and join in the knocking of the company. He seemed to have a problem understanding that August came after April in the calendar when I pointed out some facts to him !

[kemche] 10/11/2016 16:58

And this kind of thing - so he is at least speaking from experience of altering RNS's. You may even say he is a master of it!


Bygd,
You have made the following assertion a number of times before and I have previously pointed out your error, which, as always, you have steadfastly refused to either acknowledge or change:

"One in particular worth up to £2.5m over a 10 year period with a initial 1.8M Over the next 18 months and easily checked,"

If there is anyone here who is duplicitous and an out and out liar then that has to be you. So here again, for your edification, is the exact quote from the RNS issued by the company on 8th September 2016:

"Depending on contract options and call-off timing, the TEAM2100 programme could deliver in the region of GBP1m in revenue to Strat Aero over the next 18 months, and GBP2.5m over the duration of the whole programme."

Note two things in particular:

1) The figure quoted for the next 18 months is £1m AND NOT the £1.8m that you keep lying about incessantly

And,

2)Notice the phrase "COULD DELIVER". Now I understand that you have obvious difficulties with the English language so let me be of some assistance. "COULD" is a conditional form and expresses a POSSIBILITY of something occurring BUT NOT THE CERTAINTY of it occurring. So for example, I may say "I could swim the English Channel" but the chances of that happening are as remote as you learning to analyse the financial state of a company.

Now I understand that you are deeply underwater here but that is not an excuse to entice others into this company with your incessant lying. I hope for the sake of the more gullible out there that you see sense and stop peddling these untruths.

[andy] 10/11/2016 16:41

bygdennis

More filibustering, as expected, because you continue to dig a deeper hole for yourself.


"rewriting RNS, Changing reliable news,"


You accused us of rewriting RNS" when in fact NOBODY can do that, they are released by the stock exchange!

So we cannot "rewrite them" because they are official news releases, listed on the London Stock Exchange website, for anyone to access and read.

No bull nor bear here can "rewrite" anything, it's in black and white on the LSE and company websites!

[bygdennis] 10/11/2016 15:48

Great post yorgi with helpful information, Much better than all the rubbish being posted on these threads at the moment while we wait for updates.

[yorgi] 10/11/2016 14:40

NEW REPORT | Drones in Surveying – a Value Chain Analysis for the Construction Industry
Small UAVs, as compared to manned aircraft, convince through their ability to fly very slowly and at lower altitudes. This way, more detailed and valuable information can be obtained. UAVs close the gap (between ground- and aircraft/satellite-based methods) through their ability to fly at low altitudes (up to 100m), which cannot be covered by the alternatives mentioned previously.



“It should be mentioned that compared to other options, UAVs are rather limited in terms of the amount of payload they can carry. This is why light, non-professional consumer cameras are generally used, although they cannot match the quality of stable metric cameras. Yet, even with those comparatively inexpensive cameras, it is possible to attain results that are more than sufficient for the needs of the construction industry.”
– Prof. Thomas P. Kersten, HafenCity University Hamburg, Geomatics Lab


Now, what does this mean for you business?

The possibility to shorten the surveying process through the support of UAV solutions contains the potential to enormously reduce the time and monetary investment – for every project, for every surveying company and in every country. Surveyors can not only increase their productivity by being able to carry out more projects in the same amount of time, but they can also work with a more qualitative dataset, which makes it possible to conduct better, more thorough planning.



To make the right decisions it is important to define the results you need. Therefore you can use the inverse decision-making process below. After the initial question if you want to hire a professional drone operator or starting a drone operation yourself it necessary to have a close look at the local regulations and environmental conditions. Once the mission and all aspects of operation are clear, you can start to configure the unmanned aerial system (UAS). With all information describing your plans (incl. fixed and operational costs) you can now chose again whether to start your own drone operation or to buy in the service.
decision-making-process-for-the-use-of-uav-technology-for-construction
Where exactly can I save money and how much?

Looking at the entire value chain it becomes clear that many resource- and time-intensive activities can be replaced. Looking at repetitive activities (e.g. checking construction progress of the same location), the savings through UAV operation can be even greater.



The report Value Chain Analysis for UAV-based Surveying represents the essence of what you need to know if you consider using drone technology in surveying. It offers a detailed outline of technological, legal and operational aspects of UAV application in comparison to conventional surveying methods. The question when UAV technology in the construction industry pays off economically is discussed in detail.



In addition to the Drone Business Development Guide 2016 which outlines the basics of a UAV market entry, this report is mission specific and provides the most comprehensive analysis about commercial UAVs in action so far. This report was created with the support of construction surveying and UAV experts.

[pilotov] 10/11/2016 13:58

A cornered rat - expect more frightened gibberish...

[andy] 10/11/2016 13:53

BYGdennis,

"Playing with words as i said doesn't change what is! Does it?"

---

Errrr

Yes it does!

Read it!

"and the right to have their own opinions guesses to give advice whan rewriting RNS, Changing reliable news,"



Is the word "changing" a clue?

[bygdennis] 10/11/2016 13:35

Baby talk! playing games like naive little saints, Does rewriting mean altering?, Yes, When you have rewritten/altered something have you then changed it?
Playing with words as i said doesn't change what is! Does it?
But you do it all the time, Still does not change anything really does it? Not when I point it out, This is the only reason you have a go at me, Still, It doesn't change anything either, Does it?
Carry on your hole gets deeper and deeper, Be careful as you go.

[andy] 10/11/2016 12:31

bygdennis10 Nov '16 - 09:42 - 3080 of 3082 2 0
Andy, You've completely lost the plot, You're in a mess of your own making, Who said change?

-------

Errrr, YOU did!

bygdennis - 18 Aug 2016 - 06:43:12 - 2140 of 3080

and the right to have their own opinions guesses to give advice whan rewriting RNS, Changing reliable news,

[andy] 10/11/2016 12:25

pilotov,

I agree, the syntax is deliberate, and I'm pretty sure he is connected to AERO in some shape or form.

He is using the typical BB tactic of throwing mud and hoping some sticks, to try and create doubt in the minds of any newbies who may arrive on the thread.

[pilotov] 10/11/2016 09:46

Andy -I asked him many moons ago how it was possible to "alter RNS's and change the news". He didn't answer then and he won't answer now. You've asked him a dozen times to name the "lies". He didn't answer then and he won't answer now. He writes in haste and doesn't know how to backtrack, instead just writes more of the same, as if that proved his points. He is actually quite clever with his own "mind games" and (deliberately?) dubious syntax!

[bygdennis] 10/11/2016 09:42

Andy, You've completely lost the plot, You're in a mess of your own making, Who said change? Little alterations you make in your very desperate situation, but trying to alter the situation the way you are is futile and childish.
As I keep advising you, You can't change what is with words, Things are how they are no matter what you say to try to change it. All you can do is attempt to alter it, But things as they are will remain as they are, Get it?
There is a big difference between changing and altering to suit your agenda, This is the trouble with your campaign, Not me!, Things have changed and you nor the group can't alter it back to how it was by using outdated information, This is what you hope will help you. It won't because it can't. Can it?
Things are only changed if you alter it, Doesn't make it right does it? I am trying as always to help you.

[bygdennis] 10/11/2016 08:32

Andy, You are getting increasingly bold, Which one of you lies would you like me to prove?

[kemche] 10/11/2016 08:28

"Honesty is not your forte"

Who knew that BygLiar does irony?

And chutzpah as well!

[andy] 09/11/2016 20:50

pilotov,

Yes I think you're right.

He can post on the mutual backslapping thread he shares with 'yorgi'.

They can 'say it like it is' to their hearts content.....................

[pilotov] 09/11/2016 20:38

I think you're probably right Andy, we've all sussed him by now. It's the repeated use of the same phrases which smacks of him being given a script to follow. Personally I won't be engaging with him any more as he never answers when challenged, and is anyway mostly indecipherable. He seems unable to grasp that if the share price is this low, for this long, the company is not succeeding and that all the "improvements and successes" are meaningless until investors are convinced and start to buy the stock. Let's leave him to his unique focus on "Spikes" and his rosy and gullible view on RNS's!!

[andy] 09/11/2016 17:36

bygdennis9 Nov '16 - 11:47 - 3066 of 3069 3 1
Andy, The same lies over and over, You won't find by posting the same lies will make them come true. The only inaccuracies come from you and your group, Same lies,
The difference between us is your lies can be checked and are deliberate, Others if checked are accurate and relevant to the times.

-------

LOL!

for anyone able to decipher the above, Dennis doesn't have a clue so tries to hide it by making false accusations towards good people posting the truth about this company.

When challenged he can't justify anything he alleges, so simply repeats the same falsehoods ad infinitum.

I have come to the conclusion Dennis is not an investor here, he's overdone the stupidity, I think he's involved with the company on the PR side.

[bygdennis] 09/11/2016 13:52

Funny how you all have the same idea at the same time! Possibly you think readers here don't know know anything, Silly little children.
It's not about me is it, What i post is about Aero and it's all current and up to date.
Those interested won't care who I am and more importantly your group.
Keep trying you might get someone who may take you seriously, No one who keeps up will and most others will check Aero's recent performance and find yours has nothing todo with the recent progress made.
Any more nonsense you'd like to add?, Filtering won't hide anything will it stig

[the stigologist] 09/11/2016 13:37

Good idea.

bygdennis9 Nov '16 - 11:47 - 3066 of 3068 0 1 (Filtered)